Should a literary or artistic work be criticized for having a wrong view?

Of course, it is necessary to criticize, and this kind of work with incorrect views must not only be criticized, but also resisted. Literature and artistic works are used as culture to promote and guide the role, and if their ideas are not correct, it will only bring about a worse impact. <>

Of course, if the three views of literary and artistic works are not correct, then there is no need for them to exist at all, although they are only conveying their own thoughts, but if readers receive such thoughts and produce negative behaviors, it is also a particularly bad influence, so such works with incorrect views should be criticized.

Literature and art works are promoted as a kind of culture, and the ideas they convey should be that kind of positive energy, and if people receive that kind of negative energy thoughts, they will produce some extreme behaviors, so I think the three views are not correct and can be criticized.

If the three views are not correct, the information he conveys is wrong, which will mislead readers and have a negative impact on the correct establishment of people's three views, so we should not only criticize, but also strictly put an end to the circulation of such works.

The ** group of literary and artistic works involves all ranges, adults with the ability to distinguish, and minors who do not know the world, if these literary or artistic works with incorrect three views are seen by minors who do not have the ability to distinguish between right and wrong, it will hinder the correct formation of their three views, so it is necessary to criticize.

The spread of culture has a certain influence, and if the ideas disseminated are all the kind of ideas that have three wrong views, then the negative impact caused by this is very serious, so if the three views of literature and art are not correct, we should criticize them.

If the three views are not correct, then it will undoubtedly be very harmful to society, and we must strictly put an end to the dissemination of these literary or artistic works.

The primary function of literary and artistic works is to convey a message to people, and if the literary and artistic works with incorrect views are sent to people, they will convey a wrong message to people, which is not conducive to the formation of people's correct concepts.

Some people believe that a masterpiece should be morally evaluated because the ideas and opinions contained in it may influence the reader's values and behavior. Others argue that censorship of literary works may limit freedom of thought and expression.

In any case, it would be a highly subjective and challenging task to examine the three views of a standard literary work or to make a moral assessment of them, as different readers have different spiritual beliefs and values, and the same work may have very different reactions in different cultural contexts.

Therefore, the best way to do this is to present a variety of perspectives and ideas that allow readers to form their own opinions and understandings based on their own judgment and ability to think.

However, for some famous works with great educational and social influence, they should go through a certain amount of review and guidance to ensure that their content complies with the law and will not have a negative impact on readers. However, under the principle of freedom of expression, it is understandable for individuals to express their own views and ideas.

Summary. Hello, the aesthetic nature of literature is indeed one of the important angles of literary criticism. Literary criticism is an academic study that reviews and evaluates literary works, which can analyze literary works from different perspectives, including the history of literature, the style of literature, the meaning of literature, and so on.

The aesthetics of literature is to evaluate literary works from an aesthetic point of view, mainly focusing on the artistry and beauty of the works, including the form, language, emotion and so on of literary works. Therefore, the aesthetic nature of literature can be said to be an important angle of literary criticism. In terms of the aesthetics of literature, the evaluation of the quality of a literary work depends not only on its theme and plot, but also on its language expression, formal structure, literary significance and other factors.

For example, a good poem must not only have a deep theme, but also have beautiful rhyme and language expression, and at the same time be able to bring beautiful enjoyment and emotional resonance to the reader. Therefore, the aesthetics of literature requires us to evaluate and analyze literary works from multiple perspectives, so as to better understand and appreciate the beauty of literature. In addition to the perspective of literary criticism, the aesthetics of literature also play an important role in literary creation and literary education.

In terms of literary creation, writers need to pay attention to the artistry and beauty of their works, so as to better attract readers and convey their thoughts and emotions. In terms of literature education, paying attention to the aesthetics of literature can help students better understand and appreciate literary works, and at the same time, it can also cultivate students' aesthetic ability and literary literacy, and improve their humanistic quality and comprehensive quality.

Hello, the aesthetics of literature is indeed one of the important angles of literary criticism. Literary criticism is an academic study that reviews and evaluates literary works, which can analyze literary works from different perspectives, including the history of literature, the style of literature, the meaning of literature, and so on. The aesthetics of literature is to evaluate literary works from the perspective of aesthetics, mainly focusing on the artistry and beauty of the works, including the form, language, emotion and so on of literary works.

Therefore, the aesthetic nature of literature can be said to be an important angle of literary criticism. In terms of the aesthetics of literature, the evaluation of the quality of a literary work depends not only on its theme and plot, but also on its language expression, formal structure, literary significance and other factors. For example, a good poem must not only have a deep theme, but also have beautiful rhyme and language expression, and at the same time be able to bring beautiful enjoyment and emotional resonance to the reader.

Therefore, the aesthetics of literature requires us to evaluate and analyze literary works from multiple perspectives, so as to better understand and appreciate the beauty of literature. In addition to the perspective of literary criticism, the aesthetics of literature also play an important role in literary creation and literary education. In terms of literary creation, writers need to pay attention to the artistry and beauty of their works, so as to better attract readers and convey their thoughts and emotions.

In terms of literature education, paying attention to the aesthetics of literature can help students better understand and appreciate literary works, and at the same time, it can also cultivate students' aesthetic ability and literary literacy, and improve their humanistic quality and comprehensive quality.

I won't talk about advocating illegal crimes and violence, and I won't consider Mary Sue's brain-opening thoughts, but today I mainly want to talk about Aunt Qiong Yao's **.

What I want to say is that the love is deep and rainy, which is the ** of the TV series that we have watched countless remakes by it back then.

The first thing to say is the character of the actor He Shuhuan, he first met Ruping and then met Yiping, and Ruping was ambiguous for a long time and found that Yiping, who was still independent and strong, was more attractive, so he was with Yiping.

After finding out that Yiping was with him at the beginning to get revenge on Ruping, he immediately broke up and went to Ruping to get engaged, and then Yiping made an engagement banquet and then confessed to Yiping.

And before Yiping asked him if he would be with Ruping if he didn't have himself, he said he didn't know. Later, Ruping asked him if he would love himself if he didn't have Yiping's intervention, and He Shuhuan said yes. Seeing this is simply a bewilderment.

Ruping's character design is also very problematic, knowing that Du Fei likes herself, she asked Du Fei to help her chase He Shuhuan, and after being rejected by Du Fei, she accused Du Fei of not understanding great love and not thinking about herself at all. And then I talked about it at length, in short, I didn't think about the feelings of a person who loves me at all, and only thought about myself, which is simply too selfish.

There is also Du Fei, in order to please Ruping, he took a cat to the hospital to find a doctor to see, and the doctor said that he was not a veterinarian and would not look at cats, and there were many patients lined up behind. Du Fei began to make trouble with the doctors, and threatened the doctors to beat him. There's really something wrong with it.

Now I'm looking at Qiong Yao's **, to be honest, many of them don't meet our current three views.

Kundera's "Joke", "Slow", "Identity", "Ignorance".

Wang Anyi's "Song of Long Hatred" (highly recommended, such gorgeous words can only be described as shocking) Zhang Ailing's "Lust Caution" (much better than the movie).

Hugo's "Les Miserables" (read it again and again, keep watching, keep moving) JK Rowling's "Harry Potter" series (this can no longer be said to be pure children's literature, it is a miracle in history).

Yasunari Kawabata's "Snow Country" (a little incomprehensible, but I was deeply attracted to it) Duras "Lover" and "Hiroshima Love" (classic!!) ）

Haruki Murakami's "Norwegian Wood" and "Kafka by the Sea" (masterpiece, a classic in modern Japan).

Colleen McCullough "Thorn Bird" and "Calling" (a rare family background**family, you can write a boring family background** so well).

There are so many good books