It s even more terrible to be assimilated, debate tournament 200

Assimilation is terrible, first of all, it depends on how many arguments you play. In general, consider the points that the other party is likely to hit and prepare well in advance. Assimilation is even more terrible, because assimilation is tantamount to being chronically altered and losing the sense of self.

Lose your heart, become numb, lack your own thoughts. We are ostracized compared to exclusion. But we don't forget our original intention.

Stick to what I firmly believe in, just like I did at this time, and firmly believe that the same words are more terrible than rejection. The other person may hit, and being ostracized will make people uncomfortable, causing oppression, and bringing pressure to this point. A:

We all participated in the debate, and I would be sad that our arguments were rejected by you? Prepare a few arguments to support your own point of view. After the fight, turn to other battlefields, pay attention to the other party's words, and say them as soon as possible.

The most important thing is to stick to your point of view no matter what, make it a point of belief that you believe, and then look for examples that are good for you and can convince others. I hope you find my remarks helpful!

In today's debate, we are discussing the topic of "Assimilation is more terrible".

First, let's look at the definition of "assimilated." Assimilation refers to the transformation of different individuals or groups into similar or identical individuals or groups. Assimilation, on the other hand, is when an individual or group loses its unique identity or culture and becomes similar or identical to other individuals or groups.

So, is it scary to be assimilated? This question needs to be considered from a different perspective.

First, from a cultural point of view, assimilation can lead to the gradual disappearance or dilution of a group's culture. When members of a group are assimilated, their values, customs, and traditions may gradually converge with other groups, thus losing their unique cultural identity. The disappearance or dilution of this culture may cause members of this group to lose self-confidence and a sense of belonging.

Second, from a social point of view, being assimilated can make a group monotonous and lacking in diversity. If everyone becomes similar, then we may lose many different perspectives and ideas. This can lead to the rigidity and lack of creativity in society.

However, there are also those who believe that it is not terrible to be assimilated. They believe that everyone is a unique individual, but in modern society, people tend to be influenced by factors such as **, fashion, trends, etc., so that they become similar. Therefore, being assimilated is not a bad thing, but a way to adapt to modern society.

To sum up, whether being assimilated is terrible or not needs to be judged on a case-by-case basis. Assimilation is acceptable if, in the process of assimilation, the unique identity and culture of the individual or group are preserved and respected. However, assimilation is a terrible thing if, in the process of assimilation, the unique characteristics and culture of an individual or group are diluted and disappeared.

Therefore, we need to pay more attention to protecting and respecting the unique identity and culture of individuals and groups, so as to avoid losing oneself and uniqueness in the process of assimilation.

Thank you!

White horses are horses, and horses include white horses.

A white horse is a horse, and a white horse includes.

Here's the thing: the means and processes of exclusion are even more terrible. What does the powerful do when they want to exclude the weaker individuals or groups?

Such as school violence.

Serious to racial discrimination. Apartheid in the 60s of the 20th century.

It was once very popular in the United States, and the law even explicitly stipulated that blacks and whites should be separated in public places such as buses and restaurants. Even in the rule of law, police abuse of violence and human rights violations, including the death penalty of black people, trumped-up charges, and illegal forced detention, are not uncommon.

The cruelty of these methods is obvious to all. In contrast, assimilation is subtle, a relatively gentle process that can even give people a sense of security.

As a result, the means and processes of exclusion are even more terrifying.

The consequences of exclusion are even more terrible. When people are assimilated by good people, they may be promoted, and when they are assimilated by bad people, they will also fall into a quagmire. In this way, the motivation to assimilate weakens its viciousness and makes it appear less terrible.

At the same time, if we look at the essence through the phenomenon, we will find that what is really terrible is that people are assimilated but do not want to change and break free from the mire. On the other hand, the impact of exclusion is according to USC.

The results of the tossing experiment showed that the pain caused by rejection and rejection was the same as the pain of breaking an arm.

They also found that social exclusion not only reduced a person's ability to deal with complex intellectual problems, but also led to emotional impulsiveness, such as anger, depression, jealousy, and sadness, as well as an immune system.

Reduced functionality. Physical pain can be treated with medication, but the psychological trauma of rejection.

How do you heal? This kind of injury will accompany people throughout their lives, eroding our lives, work, and social interactions.

Social exclusion can lead to the marginalization and isolation of certain groups or individuals. First, social exclusion refers to a series of processes in which the bonds between the individual and society are weakened or broken. These excluded groups are also known as vulnerable groups.

Including the unemployed, the disabled, the poor, laid-off workers, etc.

For example, the social rights, social insurance, and minimum living security encountered by the new generation of migrant workers in the city.

and inequalities in employment opportunities, areas of employment, etc. Much of this is the result of social exclusion. When society abandons this part of the population, people become more and more disillusioned with it, and society receives less and less support, then society becomes vulnerable.

To sum up, we firmly believe that exclusion is more terrible.

Summary. Then ask: "Opposite, when you are queuing up to buy something, you find that many people buy the same thing, will you buy it?" This is the horror of assimilation".

Debate Contest Our point of view is that assimilation is more terrible, and the other side is more terrible to reject, what questions can I ask the other side?

Hello, I'm Mr. Wen, I'm happy to serve you, wait a minute, I'm sorting out the answers for you, because the number of consultations is relatively large, so I will seriously help you solve the problem one by one, please be patient.

For example, people living in society will gradually be assimilated by some bad habits, for example, you can ask: If you are in the dormitory, and the other roommates in the dormitory will play games and brush ** every night, will you still go to study?

Is it good to be professional, the questions I'm going to ask are not examples, and anyone can think of them, and I'm asking you what you're doing.

Didn't you look at the back? Questions.

What is the debate question, I find that you don't understand a little yes 1Definition 2Argument support 3Questions.

All I want is to ask questions, not to define.

Ask a question, and I'll tell you the first one.

Have more questions?

For example, in the 19th century, when World War II began, if Hong Kong's native Chinese were assimilated by the British invaders, would Hong Kong still get rid of the colony?

Finally, don't get involved in such historical events.

Yes, then I'll sort out a few of the more common ones for you.

There can be a lot of examples of the kind of <> that are asked directly

Exclusion is the process, assimilation is the goal. All rejection is a process, and the final assimilation is the result. Questions.

1.Opposite, do you think it's terrible for a person to fail in the end? 2.

Isn't it terrible that if we live in a repressive and violent environment for a long time in our lives, then we will eventually become the dominant ones in violence?

Just, ask directly? <>

Directly, <>

Opposite boy, let me ask you, in the dormitory, roommates look at beautiful women? Don't you see? This is the horror of assimilation, roommates do one thing a lot, and slowly you will develop this habit <>

Very serious debate tournament asking this is not very good hahaha is there anything else like this.

Then ask: "Opposite, when you are queuing up to buy something, you find that many people buy the same thing, will you buy it?" This is the horror of assimilation".

Also: "Opposing students, assimilation is the result, and rejection is the process, such as the college entrance examination, I was not admitted to Tsinghua University, do you think Tsinghua will look at my process <>?"

As the defense, you can ask the following questions:

Is rejection really more terrible? Can assimilation lead to the loss of one's individuality and ability to think for one's own devices?

Is assimilation really a terrible thing? Is assimilation likely to be a good option in some cases, such as in terms of maintaining social harmony?

Does rejection really protect the celestry of stockings? Is exclusion a good bend, can it lead to cultural isolation, stuffiness and decline?

Through these questions, you can lead the other person to think deeply, challenge their opinions, and help yourself to debate better.

Here's what questions you can ask the other person::

The other party thinks that rejection is more terrible than assimilation, how does the other party define and measure the concept of "terrible"? What is the difference between assimilation and exclusion on the impact of individuals and society?

In your opinion, is there a balance between exclusion and assimilation? If there is no equilibrium, what do you think this will have on the future of society and humanity?

The other party thinks that rejection is more terrible than assimilation, what impact does rejection have on people's lives and emotions? Will it lead to an increase in hatred and envy?

In your opinion, how do you balance the need for individual and group self-identity and cultural inclusion? How can the negative effects of assimilation and exclusion on individuals and societies be avoided?

Summary. In fact, it is more terrible to be assimilated, because it silently makes you lose yourself, and it wraps a gentle appearance in making you choose it. Although you are alive after assimilation, in fact, your soul is already dead, so you live in this world, but you are also mourning.

Moreover, you can resist to solve the rejection (you can just push out this group of people), at least you were still thinking independently at that time, but once you are assimilated, you are like a robot, you are controlled, you lose the ability to think independently, and you can't find your original self.

How to refute being assimilated is even more terrible

In fact, it is more terrible to be chained by Tongzhong, because it silently makes you lose yourself, and it wraps a gentle appearance for you to choose it. Although you are alive after assimilation, your soul is already dead, so you live in this world, but you are also dead. Moreover, you can resist to solve the rejection (you can directly push out this group of people to sell and bury grandchildren), at least you were still thinking independently at that time, but once you are assimilated, you are like a robot, under control, Liquid Yu has lost the ability to think independently, and you can't find your original self.

In fact, it is more terrible to be chained by Tongzhong, because it silently makes you lose yourself, and it wraps a gentle appearance for you to choose it. Although you are alive after assimilation, in fact, your soul is already dead, so you live in this world, but you are also mourning. Moreover, you can resist to solve the rejection (you can directly push out this group of people to sell and bury grandchildren), at least you were still thinking independently at that time, but once you are assimilated, you are like a robot, under control, Liquid Yu has lost the ability to think independently, and you can't find your original self.