Debate Tournament Should I explain when I am misunderstood?

Summary. Hello, refutation can't lie, that is to say that you can lie, you can lie and it is reasonable, then there is only a white lie, that is, it is better to lie than not to lie, you can give an example, just say that grandma is sick, it is very serious, if you tell her she will have a lot of pressure, do not tell her that she has a good mentality, and her body will be fine, this is a white lie, the reason for lying! I hope I can help you, I wish you a happy life, and you can continue to consult if you need anything!

Please wait a minute!

Hello, refute can't lie, that is to say, you can lie, you can lie and it is reasonable, then there is only a white lie, that is, lying is better than not lying, you can give an example, just say that grandma is sick, very serious, if you tell her she will have a lot of pressure, don't tell her that she has a good mentality, and her body will be fine, this is a white lie, the reason for lying! I hope I can help you, I wish you a happy life, and you can continue to consult if you need it!

In the past, I was a sensitive girl who cared about other people's eyes, so I was often depressed and depressed because of other people's misunderstandings about me.

So I always try to express my wishes to others and complain about my situation. And the truth is often that others don't care what I think, because the misunderstanding is already preconceived; Or maybe others are not interested in your sesame chop bright hemp little things, hehe smiled like the wind.

This annoyed me a bit of an obsessive-compulsive disorder, and I hated to dig out my heart to show others a sign of loyalty.

But that didn't work at all, and it didn't make sense. I was too concerned about strange eyes, and I was often led by others, and my emotions were extremely unstable.

It wasn't until I came across Buddhism that I understood karma and broadened my horizons and mind.

In fact, there are many things in life that do not need to be justified, and they are not confined to misunderstanding this round. Because everything happens because of the harmony of causes and conditions, it has its own reason for existence. We just have to accept it, adapt to it, and change our mindset.

Practitioners advocate cessation of speech, non-justification, to get rid of ignorance and self-grasping. In particular, to cultivate the method of forbearance and humiliation, it is necessary to have too little heart and measure the sand realm.

As Guru Padmasambhava said: It is better to recite the Qi language for a year, than to recite the spring for a month.

If you have changed your mind, why care about other people's opinions? Naturally, there are no worries.

Summary. Hello dear, you can do this when you can't debate the game.

There is a way to repeat or further state one's argument before you have time to think about the other person's problem.

Of course, this can only buy a little bit of time, and if you talk too much, the other side will object.

Another way to do this is to quote when you can't express it directly or accurately, and assume that the other person's argument is true, leading to a tricky result.

When the debate is not available.

Dear, hello, your socks problem Yaoyao has been dealt with, and it has been sent to you with a full code of text, you can check it later, leave a message at any time, Yaoyao will actively solve your problem In order to be able to solve your problem smoothly, please be patient for a while, thank you.

Dear, hello, when you can't debate Wu Peisai, you can do this, there is a way to call the east and west, in the case of not having time to think about the other party's problem, first repeat or further state your own argument, of course, this can only buy a little time, say too much, the other party will object, there is also a way called quotation, when it cannot be directly or accurately expressed, the false orange book assumes that the opponent's argument is valid, and leads to a panicked result.

Summary. Against: Lies, lying is deception, deception is immoral, and immoral things are unpopular.

But we ask ourselves, who hasn't told a lie? Whether it is to one's relatives, friends, or people we don't know, there are many kinds of purposes, but when we add a "good intention" to a lie, it seems that everyone may accept it, which is the concentrated expression of human weakness.

Hello dear. Opposite: Lies, lying is cautious and deceptive, deception is immoral, immoral and unpopular things are unpopular, these are all taught by the junior teachers.

But we ask ourselves, who hasn't told a lie? Whether it is to one's relatives, friends, or people we don't know, there are many kinds of purposes, but when we add a "good intention" to a lie, as if everyone might accept it, this is the concentrated expression of human weakness.

Opposite: Lies, lying is cautious and deceptive, deception is immoral, immoral and unpopular things are unpopular, these are all taught by the junior teachers. But we ask ourselves, who hasn't told a lie?

Whether it is to one's relatives, friends, or people we don't know, there are many kinds of purposes, but when we add a "good intention" to a lie, as if everyone might accept it, this is the concentrated expression of human weakness.

Square:. "White lies" are people's good wishes for things, the dialogue of people's kind hearts, a trace of warmth for people to comfort each other, and a kind of tenderness and ...... that people reveal from the bottom of their heartsNo one will investigate its credibility, even if the person who hears the white lie knows that it is a lie, he will still try to believe it, and will not feel the hypocrisy of the liar, and sometimes he will feel the patience of the bureau! Hello.

The most common mistakes made in general debate competitions are the following.

1. Excessive emotion and lack of etiquette.

2. Too nervous, the language loses its logic, and the slips of the tongue are frequent.

3. Deviating from the core debate, entangled in small points, and ignoring the main line.

The above are low-level mistakes, and the following are high-level strategic mistakes.

4. The offensive is too strong and domineering, which makes the judges resistant.

5. Just targeted each other everywhere and said that the other party had no words, but did not convince the judges and the audience. (The core task of the debate is to convince the judges).

6. The language is gorgeous enough but the logic is insufficient, and many logical errors have been singled out.

7. The logic is too thorough, so that the audience and judges can't figure out your logic in a limited time.

8. The free debate time arrangement is unreasonable, leaving a long time for the other party to freely refute.

9. When debating, you only face each other and do not face the audience and judges.

will be led by the other party's nose, there will be loopholes caught by the other party, there will be chaos, all the time around the examples proposed by the other party, too nervous, the language is out of logic, frequent slips of the tongue, insufficient logic, and no convincing judges. Etcetera.

There will be a digression while talking, make all preparations in advance!

Dear <> will be happy to answer for you. The other party's testimony can be expressed in the following sentences: 1

I don't agree with the testimony because it's not convincing. 2.I could not accept the other party's testimony because it lacked valid evidence to support it.

3.The testimony of the other party is unreasonable because it has no reliable basis. 4.

I think the other party's evidence leak is invalid because it is not leaseback in line with the facts. Extended Supplement: 5

The testimony of the other party is not credible because it is not supported by sufficient evidence. 6.I object to the other party's testimony because it has no legal force.

7.I do not endorse the testimony of the other party because it is not reliable. 8.

I could not accept the other party's testimony because it did not have enough physical evidence to prove it. <>