The view of the asexual race, the definition of the asexual person of the asexual person

By asexuality, we mean that we are neither male nor female. At the same time, two conditions are met, one is to consider oneself to be "neither male nor female", and the other is recognized by the first institution.

There is a concept called "genderlessness", which is not simply equivalent to "neutral style", the former pays more attention to a self-attitude, no longer simply divides the world into two kinds of men and women, and the expression of diversity is more suitable for the current pluralistic social situation. In his eyes, there is no man, no accompanying woman. There are only people, this person in his mind, in his thoughts, views and theories, but people do not distinguish between men and women.

The biggest difference between us and animals is that we can think, our civilization, our thoughts, should be able to break through the shackles of the body. This kind of physical physiology is only an external appearance, and should not become a constraint on our thoughts and insides.

When analyzing the works of some celebrity artists, it is not uncommon to say that the (male) artist has certain female psychological characteristics. In the view of the non-genderist, these distinctions are unnecessary, there is no difference between people in infancy, and it is the different upbringing in the growth that causes the appearance and psychology of men and women to change.

Genderlessness is a type of genderqueer or gender identity, also known as psychosexual.

Agender, also known as psychosexual, is a genderqueer or gender identity that is asexual, and others perceive them as neither male nor female.

Anasexism is a social concept and movement that focuses on and pursues gender equality. It argues that gender, as a socially constructed concept, should be abolished and that people should get rid of gender stereotypes and gender discrimination and achieve true equality.

The core idea of genderlessness is: "There are no men or women, only human beings." "Under this thinking, people should transcend gender boundaries and see each person as an individual, rather than judging and treating them according to their gender.

Therefore, the aracists advocate the abolition of all gender-related systems, such as toilets for men and women, grouping of male and female athletes, etc.

Under the idea of being genderless, people should be able to freely choose their gender identity, including transgender and transgender people. This means that people can choose to have a different gender identity than they were born with, and society should accommodate and respect that choice.

However, in practice, there are many challenges and criticisms of genderlessness. Some argue that gender is an inescapable reality rather than a socially constructed concept; In addition, the abolition of gender distinctions may lead to practical problems, such as gender discrimination and gender-based violence, which are not effectively addressed.

In conclusion, lenient asexist is a philosophy that seeks gender equality and eliminates gender discrimination, and although it faces many challenges in practice, it provides a way of thinking that eliminates gender limitations.

Sexism is about not identifying gender differences, because in many places there is too much gender binary (i.e., most people insist that there are only two genders) and the treatment of gender minorities is very unfair. As a result, there is a local elimination of gender pluralism (emphasizing that there are many types of genders) and anisomorphism (not emphasizing gender differences).

Also, with regard to the toilet bill, the installation of toilets in many countries can be troublesome, because how disappointing it would be if a person of a minority gender went to the toilet and did not see a toilet of their own gender. But if each gender were to build toilets individually, it would be almost impossible. So the non-sexism insists that the toilet is not gender-specific, just go in and then lock the door.

In fact, it is also a very simple and quick proposal, and it respects people of all genders.

Regarding the affirmative dress movement, non-sexism insists on equal dressing, that is, "I can wear whatever I like", because the clothes themselves are used to make yourself look better (if it is just to protect yourself from the cold or cover your shame, you don't need to use clothes at all), so the clothes themselves should not be used to distinguish between genders. All genderless and almost all gender pluralists, as well as a large number of binary genderists, are involved in the movement for affirmative action. So we can still see a lot of boys in skirts or girls who dress coolly, and many public toilets no longer use the logo of two villains wearing skirts and pants to distinguish between men and women, which is in a sense genderless (no gender differences) I think genderless is very simple and reasonable to respect people of each gender.

Before other people's answers, gender and sexual orientation have nothing to do with each other at all. If you are looking for a spouse (or spouses) without sexism, it is up to you whether you like it or not, regardless of gender. Of course, if he is also a celibate himself, he may not look for it.