The case of the woman being drugged by a fellow man is doubtful and not arrested, why is it not arre

The new criminal law provides for the protection of criminal suspects by not arresting suspects. An arrest can only be approved if there is no doubt in all aspects of the evidence.

Although there was evidence, the evidence gathered did not lead to the arrest of the man on any charge, as the man was an attempt to commit a crime.

Because the previously well-preserved evidence was suddenly "destroyed", the prosecution said that the water cup that originally contained the medicine had been cleaned and could not be arrested without physical evidence.

Because the woman was not actually assaulted, and the man was an attempted crime, which did not cause serious consequences, there was not much attention.

Due to insufficient evidence in this case, the key evidence in this case, the medicine in the water cup, was poured out, the water cup was cleaned, and the direct evidence was lost. Therefore, the procuratorate did not arrest him.

The prosecutor responded to the incident of the woman being drugged by a fellow man, and the prosecutor was suspicious and did not arrest, but also had his own judgment, and at present, he just needs to wait for the announcement of **!

Because the police said through investigation that the man just wanted to see the girl's reaction after drinking, and the drug did not pose substantial harm to the woman's body, and the two did not have any sexual relations, various factors led to the inspector's suspicion and not arrest.

Because the chain of evidence is insufficient, it does not mean that people must be arrested if they break the news at will, but they still have to pay attention to evidence.

The procuratorate ordered the arrest of someone is not as simple as we think. Judging from the fact that a woman was "drugged" by a male partner in a restaurant, the People's Procuratorate of Futian District, Shenzhen, has made it very clear in the explanation of the situation. That is, the most crucial direct evidence in this matter has disappeared, and the existing evidence cannot arrest the person involved in the drug.

1. The most critical law for physical evidence is that it is necessary to pay attention to the factual basis, and the specific implementation of each legal provision must have direct evidence.

2. Understanding the law is very importantWe live in a world, and although we don't want to hurt others, we also need to have the awareness of protecting our legitimate rights and interests from infringement.

3. Girls need to have the awareness of protecting themselvesAlthough the environment we live in is already very good, women, as a vulnerable group in society, still need to have the awareness of protecting themselves.

NowIt is also often seen that there are some girls who are hurt because of their carelessness. Girls can't do too much to protect themselves.

The suspicion is that there is no actual evidence, pointing to whether the woman was drugged or left with the other party.

The suspicion was that the motives of the colleague were and that there was no direct evidence to make the arrest.

So far, there is no clear evidence to prove that her peers drugged her, and her peers did not have the time and motive to commit the crime.

The question in this matter is why did the woman go out with this group of people? Why are they still going out with boys without figuring out their purpose?

It's just that the chain of evidence is not perfect, it doesn't mean that someone must be arrested immediately if someone reports a crime, everything must pay attention to evidence.

This suspicion is supposed to be how she was drugged and then discovered, and it has not yet been figured out.

may be because the previous reports are untrue, they are just rumors from netizens, not real official reports.