Why do employees brought out by the same leader have different futures?

As the saying goes:The master leads the way in, and the cultivation depends on the individual. It's not the apprentices brought out by the same master, they can all have the same ability.

The same is true in the workplace, not the same leader brings out the employees, the ability can be the same, the ability is different, the natural future is also different.

As an individual, when facing the same leader, how should you make yourself that excellent person? I think it might be helpful for you to do the following:

Be proactive

It is impossible for leaders to take care of everything, and it is impossible to take care of the skills taught to employees. Therefore, it is necessary for employees to have a proactive attitude, take the initiative to find problems, and take the initiative to ask leaders for advice, so as to continuously recharge their learning.

Practice a lot

People who can only talk on paper are not good at fighting after all, just like in the workplace, it is unrealistic to try to improve one's ability through a bunch of theories. The real so-called ability needs to be implemented in the work, and only through practice can we continue to verify whether the theories we have learned are enough to support the changes in the market.

Resource integration

If two people have exactly the same ability, why are their careers still different?

Well, all I can say is that it's a matter of personal resources. People who have sufficient resources and know how to use resources for integration will have a greater advantage. Relationships in the workplace are actually a manifestation of resources, and maintaining these relationships is equivalent to laying a solid foundation for your future.

Finally, I want to say that there are too many factors that affect a person's future, not only personal ability, or personal resources, but also opportunities, luck, choices, and a series of reasons, but no matter what, hard work is right.

As the saying goes, the master leads the door, and the cultivation depends on the individual. In this process, the leader can only play a leading role, in the end how far different employees can go, to what height, or to see the employees themselves.

There are no two identical leaves in the world, and each employee has different characteristics and different abilities, which is destined to have completely different development paths and different natural futures.

In addition to the external objective influencing factors, we will discuss the subjective initiative of individual employees. What are the characteristics of those who have a bright future among the employees brought out by the same leader?

001: Recognize Allah.

Even in school, it is difficult for teachers to take care of every student. What's more, the workplace is not like a school, and it is impossible for leaders to teach you everything by hand.

More often, we need to give full play to our own subjective initiative, take the initiative to learn, humbly ask other colleagues for advice on what we don't understand, learn from others' strengths, and make up for our own shortcomings, so as to grow faster.

002: Timely execution of feedback.

In the eyes of leaders, people with high executive ability are often preferred.

This is mainly because they can implement the things assigned by the leader faster, give the leader corresponding feedback, report to the leader one by one what step the matter has progressed to, and what cooperation is needed, and even do the things that the leader has not expected in advance, the leader does not need to follow behind to urge them to do, and the employees will consciously handle the matter well, and even take the details into account to avoid the leader to worry.

For people in the workplace, a good leader who is willing to help his subordinates succeed is important, but personal effort and seriousness are even more important. If we do not bring into play the subjective initiative of the individual, it will be difficult to achieve greater development.

The same leader brings out the employees brought out, just like the students brought out by the same teacher, although everyone is out of the same school, but the final result is completely different. First of all, because of individual differences, it is undeniable that almost 99% of us are the same, but the formal difference of 1% will bring completely different results. We have different IQs and different personalities, so we will bring differences in how we do things, so even if the leaders teach the same, the future is different.

The second is individual effort, everyone works under the same leadership, so everyone's input to the work is different. Some people are lazy and lazy at work, but some people are extremely diligent, maybe his IQ may not be as good as others, but diligence can make up for clumsiness, especially if you are diligent at work, the leader will look at it, and the leader will prefer such employees.

Finally, the ability to face opportunities and challenges is different, especially when there are some vacancies in the company and a talent needs to be promoted, this is an opportunity, some people can seize it, and some people can't grasp it.

This is very easy to understand, the master leads the door, and the practice is in the individual. For an employee, if you don't work hard, you don't learn, no one will be able to stuff knowledge into your head.

For example, if the leader explains some things, and one person remembers 80 percent of the knowledge he teaches, and you only remember 20 percent, then the progress and the completed work are different.

No matter how good a teacher is, he also needs to have good students, when he was a child, there will always be disobedient children in the class who do not study, and the teacher has given him a lot of energy, but he just doesn't remember it in his heart.

In this case, there will naturally be a difference. No teacher can really watch you study and listen to lectures 24 hours a day, and it is impossible to put it in the workplace. The master takes you, say a few more words happily, and hide it if you are unhappy, and you don't know, and you have to go around a lot of bends to learn.

Therefore, the effort is still your own, no one takes the things in your head, and no one can steal them, only your own efforts can make the teachings of a good master play a valuable role.

For example, when you go to school, there is a difference in the academic performance of the students brought out by the same teacher, and there will be significant differences in what the students learn when the teacher teaches the students fairly.

Not to mention the employees in the society under the leadership of the leader, a bowl of water can not be leveled, and it is inevitable that when the leader favors one over the other, the leader wants to go up, who feels pleasing to the eye, and generally that person will climb faster.

People are different from each other, and some people have low comprehension, that is, we say they have no vision and don't know how to behave in front of the leader, and this kind of person is me.

So if you want to take a different path from people in the same period, you may need to behave well, to be the same before and after, if you just want to perform well in front of the leader, and be lazy in the place where the leader can't see, this kind of person will generally not stay long.

Those who rise fast are either relatives of the boss, or those who have strong communication skills, and you have different futures, precisely because there is a gap between you, and those gaps are not formed in a day or two.

This question is like asking, why are the students brought out by the same teacher different, why are they all students brought out by the same teacher, one is a gangster, and the other is the CEO of the company?

I believe that you naturally have the answer in mind, so the answer to this question is obvious.

All success depends on oneself, all efforts are rewarded, no matter how outsiders interfere in our affairs, it has no effect, our teachers teach out of Tsinghua University and Peking University, and also teach out of the university, the role of teachers is very large and small, it all depends on yourself.

The same is true for leaders and employees, the role of leaders can be big or small, everything depends on yourself, just like the saying goes, the master leads the door, the practice is in the individual, and the meal is cooked for you, and you don't open your mouth to eat, then you deserve to starve to death.

If you want to succeed, you must rely on yourself, and the leader will lead you, which is a blessing and an opportunity, but if you don't work hard, ten leaders will not be able to lead you. Only your own efforts can drive yourself, and only then can the hard work of the leaders not be in vain.

Children born to the same mother have different fates, and they don't want to move in their future lives, so why must the employees brought out by a boss be the same. The dragon gives birth to nine sons, the nine sons are different, everyone has their own destiny, all employees brought out by a leader are not necessarily, and everyone's fate should be the same.

Isn't everyone's future not only related to their mentor, but also not only their leader, but also the person who leads the master to practice. The leader handed you over, the future life is all on your own, the future future, destiny are in your own hands, I can teach you, but it does not mean that all the roads in your future should be led by me. <>

Therefore, a leader brings out all employees, does not necessarily mean that all people should be the same their fate, their future is in their own hands, if they are willing to be motivated, self-motivated, then their future must be very bright, if they have fallen from this, then their life will naturally be unsatisfactory.

The difference between the employees brought out by a leader is definitely not the reason of the leader, but the reason of the employees themselves. In the same position, others have been promoted and raised, but you have been standing still, why is this?

Some people will think that the person gave the gift, and I didn't give the gift, so I didn't give a promotion. I think that as long as people think like this, their future will be mediocre.

When the leader issues the task, do you complete the task, or do you think you have completed it, just like when the leader asks you to ask when the leader will arrive, you only give the leader a time, but when the leader then asks which airport on this day, you say you didn't ask, the leader said okay, you go out.

You still think that you have completed the task, but when another person also receives such a task, the feedback to the leader is not only the exact time, but also the airport of arrival, and the pick-up is ready and the hotel and dinner are booked.

This is the gap, which is why the same leader brings out the employees, but the future is different, the leader must like the latter, because he will stand in the leader's point of view, no need for the leader to worry about it.

There used to be six or seven children in a family, but their lives were very different.

When I was in school, the same class was taught by the same teacher, and the method and specific content of classroom teaching were the same, but the final class score ranking would still be quite different. In fact, the key factor also depends on the trainee himself, his understanding, quality, diligence and other reasons are directly affected by the final conclusion, the same is true for the beginning of the workplace, the same leader to bring down the employees, although at the beginning of the same starting line, but because of the employee's understanding, work attitude, quality of work and other factors.

In the end, there are usually people who make test results, run ahead, and thus have different development prospects. Do you carry out the daily tasks assigned by the leader? Whether it can be carried out according to quality and quantity before the delivery date, or even higher than the expected completion goal, the specification of delivery in your work is enough to see your work attitude, and the leader is thoroughly in the eyes.

Summarizing is a faster way to improve yourself, according to the daily tasks of a combat exercise, from which you can summarize the work experience that you didn't know before, and then quickly fill in the previous shortcomings.

And apply the reusable work experience to the next Daily or a different industry, and the end result may be different. The self-motivation of really outstanding professionals is particularly strong, and they will actively think about how to do their work quickly and accurately without the urging of external leaders and the pressure of work at the time stage, and even continue to improve their work goals and methods. And these people who don't shout or work every day, and think about how to be lazy and slippery every day, are of course unlikely to have a good development trend.

As the old saying goes, "The master leads one into the door, and the practice depends on the person." For the same Daily, some people usually think in parallel lines, but it is also very easy to fall into the trap. Some people are net-minded, good at finding connections between each other and looking for the best way to play.

Therefore, the most substantial difference between people is that there is a difference in their thinking and concepts. Thinking concepts can derive many main manifestations of personal behavior, such as temperament and executive ability.

This is because the leaders are the same, but the employees are different, the employees have different ideas, different thinking, different emotional intelligence, different abilities, and different practices, so the future is also different.

Because each subordinate has a different way of thinking and doing things, and the difference in thinking and consciousness may also affect their personality and executive ability, which affects their different futures.

Because the abilities of employees are different, the leaders work on them differently.