Is it wrong to burn books and pit Confucianism?What is Book Burning and Confucianism?

Of course, it is wrong to burn books and pit Confucianism. Historically, Qin Shi Huang.

It is naturally wrong to kill Confucian scholars and burn a large number of Confucian classics, so why do I think that it is wrong to burn books and pit Confucianism: <>

First, from a cultural point of view, the burning of books and the pit of Confucianism have dealt a devastating blow to China's most representative Confucian culture, and even led to a certain degree of cultural vacuum, and a cultural fault has emerged. This can be said to be an act that has caused the historical regression of our country's culture, and from this point of view, it is simply a big mistake to burn books and pit Confucianism.

Second, politically speaking, Confucian culture is actually conducive to feudalism.

The rule of the people, from the Han Dynasty Dong Zhongshu.

Implement the deposition of Confucianism from a hundred schools.

It is not difficult to see from this policy that the culture pursued by Confucianism is conducive to the consolidation of political power and the development of national strength under feudal rule. The book burning pit Confucianism is precisely the opposite, he carried out a terrible blow to Confucian culture, using pure violent means to suppress Confucianism, and the short life of the Qin Dynasty has to be said to confirm its mistakes.

There should be two sides to the matter of burning books and pit Confucianism, and in today's view, this matter must be a mistake, after all, at that time, countless Confucian students were killed and countless Confucian classics were destroyed. This has led to the destruction of many ancient books, resulting in many documents being tried on directly. Moreover, many thinkers were killed at that time, which was very detrimental to the spread of ideas, and it can be said to be a catastrophe in the history of Chinese civilization, which is very regrettable.

And as far as the matter of killing others is concerned, it is also a very cruel thing, and it is not done by Mingjun.

But if it was said at the time, it was a very correct thing. Because the six countries had just been unified at that time, the regions still retained the previous cultural traditions, and various schools of thought coexisted, which was very unfavorable to the unification of the country, so at this time, the book burning pit Confucianism ensured that there was no heretical thought, and Legalism became the only orthodoxy, so this consolidated the centralization of power and was conducive to the unification of the country. So from this point of view, this thing is very correct and necessary.

Not wrong. If the books were not burned, there would be nothing except for the development of the "Yi" Jingchuan and the "Spring and Autumn" research society in the Qin Dynasty, and there would be no regional differences in the Han "Poems", if the "Shangshu" was well preserved, the ancient texts would have been completely replaced by the modern texts, the "Book of Rites" would have changed from 17 to 56, and the "Analects" and "The Book of Filial Piety" might not have diverged in versions. In this way, the germination of ancient literature in the classics of the Han Dynasty and the Han Dynasty will not be monopolized by modern literature, the exaggerated style of classics in the Northern and Southern Dynasties will become more serious, the atmosphere of doubting the scriptures and changing the scriptures after the Tang Dynasty may not appear, there will be many historical obstacles to the development of science in the Song and Ming dynasties, and since the late Ming Dynasty, it will be impossible to talk about the status of the study of evidence, and the number of documents will be greatly reduced.

As a result, the study of classics may have died out earlier in history, and the history of Chinese scholarship would be pale and weak. The status of traditional Chinese scholarship in the world will be greatly reduced, and today's scholars will be embarrassed in front of Western scholarship. Cultural self-confidence will be shaken, foreign cultural invasion will become more rampant, and China's modernization will be more difficult.

Who made the Qin Dynasty a critical period for the circulation of classics?

It must be wrong, because it was not done thoroughly, and Confucianism was not completely extinct.

Book burning? That's right, anyway, Confucianism is no different from those who cheated and abducted the monks, I want to say that the pit is good!

It is wrong to burn books, but it is right to pit Confucianism, Qin Shi Huang is eloquent and knows what Confucianism is.

Confucius taught that restricting people's spirit, limiting people's desires, restricting people's emotions, and restricting people's freedom, and there is no bottom line behind the masters of Chinese culture to satisfy their desires and rights.

This has led to the destruction of numerous ancient books, "cultural discontinuity." Of course, in order to rule, there is no way to kill the hostile forces.

Is it wrong to talk about it now? If that's right, there's nothing wrong with burning books.

Without "book burning and Confucianism", there would be no Qin State, and the Internet would not have to be controlled.

Mu Xiu will be destroyed by the forest wind, and the will of man is just the will of heaven.

The narrative itself is inverted and distorted.

The book-burning pit of Confucianism took place in ancient China during the Qin Dynasty. In the 34th year of the reign of Qin Shi Huang (213 BC), the doctor Qi Ren Chun Yuyue opposed the "county system" implemented at that time, and demanded that the children be divided according to the ancient system. Prime Minister Li Si refuted it and advocated prohibiting the common people from slandering the government with private learning.

At the suggestion of Li Si, the first emperor of Qin, he ordered the burning of the historical records of the nations other than the "Records of Qin", and handed over the private collection of "poems" and "books" that did not belong to the doctor's museum and burned them within a time limit; There are those who dare to talk about the execution of "poems" and "books", and the extermination of the race in the past and not in the present; Private learning is prohibited, and those who want to learn the laws and regulations must be taught by officials. This is called "book burning".

Burning books and pit Confucianism, also known as "burning poetry books, pit warlocks", after the Western Han Dynasty carefully grinding, the wide bucket is called "burning books and pit Confucianism". In 213 BC and 212 BC, Qin Shi Huang burned books and killed "more than 460 people who violated the ban."

The source of the term "burning books and pit Confucianism" is "Historical Records, Volume 121, Confucianism", which says that "in the Ji Shi of Qin, poetry and books were burned, and the six arts were lacking from then on".

"Shangshu" also said: "And Qin Shi Huang destroyed the classics of the ancestors, burned books and pit Confucianism, and the world's scholars fled and disbanded." ”

Liu of the Western Han Dynasty told the "Warring States Policy": "Let the punishment be the rule, and the belief in the small art is the way." Then he burned poetry and books, and killed Confucian scholars. ”

At the same time, Qin Shi Huang did not burn practical books on medicine, agriculture and animal husbandry.