-
Anonymous users2024-02-11Upstairs is talking nonsense. Helpless.
Your configuration feels nonsensical. I don't know what you shoot often. The first thing to consider when buying a lens is what focal length you need and what you often shoot, and the second is to measure it according to your own funds.
Since you are positioned as an entry-level SLR, then you can have a hang-up head in terms of lens, and you can take into account both portraits and scenery. 18-200mm is your best choice. If you really want to switch to a full-frame camera, you can continue to use this head, which is the most practical lens.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-10The Hummingbird Photography team has the answers:
As a big Nikon fan, I recommend the Nikon D5000 to you
I think you may not have been exposed to DSLR before, so you are not very familiar with viewfinder framing, and are more accustomed to display framing, in view of this, I recommend you Nikon D5000, its biggest feature is that it can be rotated 270° display, which is very practical for photographers who are new to SLR. **Around 4000+, the landlord can save a budget.
In addition, it is repeatedly emphasized by senior photographers:
The set of SLR lenses is not used for creation, but for learning the composition of the metering, for novices are very useful, and after you have a deep understanding of the SLR, you will naturally be sure what kind of equipment you need, that is the time for the set of lenses to retire.
In fact, the image quality of the APS-C format SLR can be considered to be no different, the gap in image quality between the low-end D3000 and the top D300S is only between millimeters, but the difference in feel and workmanship, it is completely unnecessary to buy a good body in pursuit of image quality, as the so-called "iron hit the lens, flowing the body", SLR plays with the lens.
Why should a newbie need such good gear? It's wise to wait until the technology is mature to upgrade your equipment, so the D5000 is a good choice!
Hummingbird Photography Team, sincerely.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-09I feel that the value for money of the Canon 550D is still good! The static pixels are quite high, and the quality of the camera is also good, and many reviews also give relatively high scores! Nikon is also available, and it is basically within the range of your requirements! Standard!
-
Anonymous users2024-02-08Canon or Nikon is not much different in the price of 4500, high-end cameras, Canon is slightly better, the key is that you have to think clearly about who to enter the door, because there will definitely be other lenses in the future, so for the sake of future lenses, you have to think clearly, Canon has slightly more lenses, you can consider.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-07One Canon 500D
B-head 50mm F 700 This can be had.
B005 or 4000 Wide Angle Scenery Niu 18-135 2300 Wide Focal Length Cheap.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-06One machine D90
The two heads of 50 Tenglong 17-50 VC are about 8000 yuan in total.
Refer to ****.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-05Choose the Nikon D90 body with the most practical mid-price ......
500d I use this.
550d pixel high point, the focus seems to be better, it is definitely better than 500d, but it is more expensive, and you can bear it if you want to buy it. >>>More
These things can only be summed up in one sentence: "you get what you pay for"! >>>More
18-55mm means that the focal length is 18 to 55 mm.
You should still have the words in this shot. >>>More
In comparison between the two, the latter is more suitable for the requirements of the question. >>>More
SLRs have a larger format than EMR sensors, which is the most obvious benefit. When the light is low, such as at night, when the indoor lights are dim, the same light, the same lens, aperture, shutter parameters. When it reaches the sensor, a camera with a larger sensor receives more light, and with the same pixels, you can use a lower sensitivity to achieve less noise**.