Why does the United States always exert pressure on Syria, Iran, and other countries?

Because those countries are independent. The people of the fascist countries have been suppressed for a long time. Forced and peeled. Morally, the United States must help those people liberate in order to build the image of the United States as a righteous power!

Because Syria and Iran are both friendly countries with the former Soviet Union, they don't listen to the United States, and because of oil and gas. So the United States is now going to restrain these two countries again. The United States is bored for a day without sanctions against opposing countries, from Vietnam, North Korea, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, etc.

He was quiet one day.

This is the consistent style of the Americans, who want to prove their military hegemony to the Middle East, to the Arab world, and to the whole world. Of course, the ultimate goal of the United States is to spy on the Arab region and its various resources.

In 1994, 800,000 people were killed in Rwanda by a tribal vendetta. The United States was reviled by African countries for not intervening in a timely manner: "Is it true that the lives of hundreds of US soldiers are more important than the lives of hundreds of thousands of black people?"

People were not killed by the United States, so what is the crime of the United States not interfering in the internal affairs of other countries? Because, if you have the power to stop a crime but you don't stop it, you are sinning. Such high standards have been accepted by the United States.

As a result, Clinton personally went to Rwanda to apologize and redeem himself. "Remember that there is a saying in Spider-Man, "With great power comes great responsibility".

May I ask why these countries are notorious in the country, and even the neighboring countries are not welcome, and even their own people want to revolt and overthrow the revolution**?

Interests are the most important thing.

As for the outbreak of the war in Syria, it is still impossible to avoid the big problem of oil, Syria is close to the Mediterranean, and its ports are mostly equipped with pipelines to transport oil and gas resources to Europe, and oil tankers destined for other countries also call at Syrian ports. Most of the oil pipelines in other Middle East countries have to pass through Syria to deliver to other countries, such as Iraq. However, when we mention the first oil and gas resources to the outside world, we have to mention another major energy exporter, that is, Russia.

Since the Soviet era, Russia has mainly traded natural resources such as oil for foreign exchange. Although many of the country's oil and gas fields fell into the hands of the financial oligarchy in a chaotic era such as the collapse of the Soviet Union, after Putin's efforts over the years, this has become Russia's main exchange for foreign exchange.

This is also Russia's weakness, once the international oil price fluctuates, then Russia's economy will inevitably suffer huge losses, and Western countries have also repeatedly controlled the rise and fall of the ****, in this way to suppress Russia, intending to sanction the operation of the Russian economy through this means. With the outbreak of the Syrian civil war, the United States is trying to fully control the oil and gas transportation in the Middle East, and wants to use this to transport oil from the Middle East to the world, so as to completely squeeze Russia out of the international energy market, so that Russia can no longer get up, and war is the best way to hit Syria.

After all, there is not so much money. From the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia to Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria, the less money is being paid, so it is necessary to ask for accounts first.

The United States is going to **, and the main energy is to choose**.

North Korea is protected by China.

Iran is protected by oil.

Syria is protected by the Arab world.

Rat-thrower.

Personally, I think Iran will retaliate against this, but certainly not by Iran itself, but by Iran's partners in Syria who will retaliate against the United States.

After all, the United States carried out an assassination not long ago, killing the commander of the Quds Force of others, and this time it came to attack other people's targets in Syria. How can Iran endure it, after all, it caused a very serious problem last time, and if Iran endures it this time, it will really have no face at home, because everyone has thrown their fists in the face. However, there is a high probability that Iran will not retaliate directly, that is, launching missiles to attack the US military in Syria, which may refer to Iran's own forces in Syria to launch an attack on the US military base and give the US military a lot of work.

Because a direct attack on the US military gives the US military an excuse to continue to intensify its strikes in the future, and even directly hit you in Iran.

How to say it, Iran will definitely retaliate, but it must also think about how to retaliate. Although Iran likes to be tough, in fact, Iran's military strength is definitely not able to defeat the US military, and the US military has never dared to directly attack Iran. One is because of the countries of the Middle East, and the other is because Iran has a lot of oil.

There is no need for the United States to be reluctant to deal with oil, after all, the US military is now stealing oil in Syria every day, and I don't know how happy it is. But if you Iran openly attacks the US military, then the US military can take the opportunity to bomb you directly in Iran, and there is nothing you can do about it, and it is useless to condemn. Iran's way of retaliating against the US military is actually very simple, that is, to continue to support the Iranian forces in Syria, and just go to trouble the US military every day, just like the sparrow tactics, constantly attacking and harassing the US military.

In general, Iran will definitely retaliate, because Iran is not a country that suffers for nothing, but I don't know what means to retaliate against the US military.

I think Iran will retaliate with some action. Iran's ability to maintain a strong presence in the chaos in the Middle East proves that it is not easy to mess with.

According to the current situation, Iran should not retaliate and strike, after all, they do not have such strength, and they do not have such military talents, and they are not comparable to the United States in terms of strength, nor can they compare with the United States in military strength.

Personally, I think Iran will definitely retaliate, because although Iran is a small country, it is definitely a country that often rises in wars, so the consequences are also very serious.

3.Geopolitical interests.

In short, the causes and effects of the U.S. intervention in the Syrian civil war are diverse. While the United States claims that its actions are aimed at combating terrorism and promoting democratic transitions, in reality its actions have also brought a series of undesirable consequences. In the future, the United States needs to carefully evaluate its policies in the Middle East and take more responsible and prudent actions.

U.S. intervention in Syria requires a lot of resources and money. The United States needs to provide not only military assistance and support, but also responsibility for refugee reception and reconstruction. These are huge burdens that will have a rolling impact on the economic and social development of the United States.

Syria is strategically located in the Middle East and is of great geopolitical importance for the United States. The United States hopes to control the political landscape in the region and protect its interests in the Middle East by intervening in Syria.