In ancient sieges, why didn t you choose to bypass the city and attack the rear directly?

The first is that the city is built in a place with dangerous terrain, which is difficult to detour, the second is that after bypassing, the local area harasses logistics and makes it difficult to supply grain and grass, and the third is that it is easy to be attacked from both sides.

In ancient times, the siege of the city, do not choose to bypass the city, directly sneak attack the rear, many of the cities are built in the dangerous terrain, occupy the strategic artery, can be described as a man, ten thousand people can not open. If you encounter such a city when you are marching and fighting, it is difficult to detour, after all, other roads are basically barren mountains and mountains, and it is difficult to march.

That's because in ancient sieges, in fact, there were armies guarding the rear of the city, so they generally chose to attack head-on.

This is because there are many cities built in dangerous places, occupying strategic routes, and it is difficult to detour when encountering such cities during the march and battle, after all, other roads are basically barren mountains and mountains, and it is difficult to march.

In ancient times, fortified cities were built in strategic locations, and if they did not break through the city walls and bypass them directly, they would affect the march and suffer from the enemy's back.

Bypassing the scattered troops is easy to be sneak attacked, besides, if you don't beat the city, the logistics will not be cut off by others, and then you don't have to fight because of the food problem failure, in ancient times, it is simply unrealistic to want to do military pay by robbing the peasants' grain, because the peasants don't have much food in their hands, and they can't meet the needs of so many soldiers at all, besides, if you rob the peasants' grain, people will run out or starve to death, what is the use of the land that is defeated, the ancient war is about fighting to beat the city, It is to feed the army with the materials in the city that it is called to feed the war with war, not to rob the peasants of the grain to feed the war.

It is easy to be attacked back and forth by bypassing, and the city is the core of a place, and only by mastering the core can you really master a place.

Ancient cities can be bypassed, but if you want to occupy the opponent's territory, you must attack the city.

Ancient cities can be walked around. For the purpose of attacking a city is to occupy it.

Go around and wait for someone to make dumplings?