Britain can abolish a constitutional monarchy, why should Britain keep a constitutional monarchy?

Whether or not Britain will abolish a constitutional monarchy depends entirely on public opinion. Britain holds a national vote every year on whether to keep the king, but so far more people agree to keep the king than not. Moreover, the king is the symbol of Britain, and most Britons are reluctant to abolish a constitutional monarchy.

Britain can abolish the constitutional monarchy on this issue, I think.

The establishment of a republic is a historical trend, but it will take a considerable amount of time, hundreds or even thousands of years. The constitutional monarchy in Europe is more suitable for their social conditions, and the United Kingdom, as the first country to implement a constitutional monarchy, has gone through a long time and won the hearts of the people. However, due to the severe economic recession in recent years, the people's voice has become louder and louder, and the process of reform will inevitably be accelerated.

Royal reform is necessary, but it must not be overdue.

Yes, for sure. Time destroys everything. But not anytime soon.

Reform is underway, but it's hard to know for sure.

When the two major political parties in Britain were evenly matched or at odds with each other, the king mediated and made decisions with impartial neutrality, as was the case with Jeanne, a theoretician of the Labour Party. Lee said:"The monarchy is a valuable buffer"。

Fifth, the British King is a symbol of the unity of the Commonwealth. Since the fall of the British Empire, Britain and its Dominions, colonies and other member states have organized a loose ensemble The Commonwealth King is legally the head of the Commonwealth, and the British governors in the Dominions and colonies are appointed by the Queen, and the British bourgeoisie uses the prestige of the British Crown to unite the Commonwealth member states and act as a link through her activities with the Crown.

In addition, the British constitutional scholar Bajhot believes that the British king has three residual powers, namely the right to inform, the right to warn and the right to encourage. The Crown is therefore entitled to detailed reports and records of Cabinet meetings and committees to which it belongs. Successive prime ministers have to report to her once a week on the state of affairs, and the prime minister has also consulted with the king on major state affairs, and the king can warn the prime minister if he thinks there is a problem with the cabinet's decision-making, and encourage the prime minister to overcome difficulties when encountered.

Because of the king's long tenure, knowledge and political experience, her advice is often taken seriously by the prime minister and thus has a real impact on cabinet decisions, which is the king's"Potential power"。

Engels once pointed out: "The British constitution cannot exist without the dilution of the monarchy, in ......."Without the royal power, the whole man-made structure will collapse. The British constitution is an upside-down pyramid with a base at the top.

So the monarch became less and less important in practice, and the more important it became in the eyes of the British. As you know, there is no place where the unification is more admired than in England. ”

1. Politically, the foundation of the British legal system at that time was that the royal rights and the rights of the nobility were essentially the same, rather than the transfer of the rights of the nobility of other countries to the rights of the monarch.

2. Economically, after Elizabeth I sorted out the finances of the British royal family, the credit of the royal family has greatly improved, which is different from the royal family of continental Europe. The acquisition of a large number of British overseas assets stemmed from the royal mandate, and the royal family and industry and commerce can be said to be symbiotic to a certain extent, rather than parasitic like France, and the burghers do not have a strong hatred for the royal family.

3. Culturally, mainly religiously, the King of England is different from other kings in that he is also the leader of the Anglican Church, and the abolition of the royal family has dealt a very heavy blow to the Anglican Church. Although the Puritans began to support the abolition of the crown, they compromised with the Restoration, when they found that excessive resistance to the state religion had led to the expansion of Roman Catholicism.