What is the power of the king of China in a constitutional monarchy???

Updated on history 2024-03-07
4 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The constitutional monarchy is to transfer the legislative power and executive power in the hands of the king and emperor to the constitution-centered Diet, but the country still retains the monarch, the world's earliest constitutional state, I think it should belong to Japan, and its emperor was already a symbol of the country in the feudal era (the general can be counted as the prime minister, the samurai law can be counted as the constitution, and the public can be counted as the parliament).

    Constitutional monarchy can be divided into real monarchy constitutional system and virtual monarch constitutional system, now most of the world is the latter, the real monarchy constitutional system is heavy on the structure of the monarch handed over the legislative power but retains part of the executive power, the prime minister only assists the monarch to govern the country, the constitution and other laws are formulated by the parliament, and the heavy system is that the parliament formulates the constitution and laws to restrict the monarch, and the monarch governs the country within the scope of the constitution and laws.

    The prime minister is the main executive of the country, and the legislation is the same as that of the real monarch, and the constitution and laws are not used to restrict the monarch but to restrict the prime minister, and the prime minister can only govern the country within the constitution and laws.

    The disadvantage is that the privileged class is left in the state, and the advantage is that constitutional government can be achieved without war.

    First of all, we must know what is a constitutional monarchy, which is also known as a "limited monarchy", which is a form of political organization in capitalist countries in which the power of the monarch is limited by the constitution, and is the product of a compromise between the bourgeoisie and the feudal forces. There are two types: dualism and parliamentarism. The constitutional monarchy of the dual system is that the monarch and the parliament share power, the monarch appoints the cabinet, the cabinet is responsible to the monarch, the monarch directly holds the executive power, and the parliament exercises legislative power, but the monarch has the right of veto.

    For example, the German Empire from 1871 to 1918 and Japan in the period after the Meiji Restoration. In modern times, a dualist constitutional monarchy is practiced only in a few countries. The parliamentary constitutional monarchy is still used by many modern capitalist countries, such as the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Thailand, Japan, etc.

    It was gradually established on the basis of a constitutional monarchy with the formation of political parties in modern times and the strengthening of the role of parliament. In this system, the parliament holds the legislative power, the cabinet is elected by and accountable to the parliament, and the actual power of the monarch is weakened, and his duties are mostly ceremonial.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    China is a socialist country.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    There are 37 constitutional monarchies, which are:Japan, Cambodia, Thailand, Malaysia, Bhutan, Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait, United Kingdom, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Spain, Andorra, Monaco, Liechtenstein, Morocco, Lesotho, Canada, Bahamas, Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Belize, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Grenada, Jamaica, Tonga, Australia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Tuvalu, Solomon Islands.

    Types of constitutional monarchies1. Dualistic monarchy.

    Also known as the dual constitutional monarchy, it refers to the premise of a constitutional monarchy, the monarch has greater power than the parliament, all major laws must be signed by it, and often have the right to appoint the prime minister and members of the House of Lords. Originating from the modernization of modern Europe, from the perspective of the first level, there are two formally contradictory directions at the same time, that is, the establishment of the ** centralized system of the nation-state, and the confirmation of relatively liberal and democratic private property.

    2. Parliamentary monarchy.

    Parliamentary constitutional monarchy, abbreviated as parliamentary monarchy. Its main characteristics are: the parliament is not only the highest legislative organ of the country, but also the highest organ of state power, and the ** head organization elected by the parliament ** is the real center of state power.

    The monarch is a symbolic head of state, and his duties are mostly ceremonial. Parliament holds legislative power, and the Cabinet is formed by the majority leader of the lower house of parliament, who is the prime minister. The Cabinet holds executive power and is supervised by and accountable to the Parliament.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Most modern monarchies have constitutional monarchies, which limit the power of the monarch to varying degrees (if the parliamentary power is greater than the monarch, it is a parliamentary constitutional monarchy; If the power of the monarch is greater than that of the Council, it is a dual monarchy.

Related questions
6 answers2024-03-07

Constitutional monarchy, monarchy, and federalism are three different state systems. >>>More

5 answers2024-03-07

1. Three systems in one. The constitutional monarchy is governed by the monarchy. >>>More

13 answers2024-03-07

Constitutional monarchy is actually a mutual compromise between capitalism and feudalism, which ensures a smooth transition from feudal society to capitalist society. The French Revolution, a revolutionary form that completely overthrew feudalism, would have shed blood and sacrifices and cause great social turmoil, but it was more revolutionary.

9 answers2024-03-07

You are asking a question, when exactly are you referring to a capitalist constitutional monarchy? Is it modern, or is it capitalism, which had just established a constitutional monarchy in the 17th century?