If the company does not go public, it will not be able to develop quickly and efficiently?

Generally speaking, first-class companies do not need to be listed, for example, Huawei is actually too easy to go public. There are many systems that can be listed that are not suitable for the founder, such as the financial statements to be announced, various major matters that need to be disclosed and even the approval of the general meeting of shareholders. If it's just your own business, how to do it is a one-person business.

There is also a dilution of equity after listing, and it is not good that the control will be lost.

Enterprises with core competitiveness are usually not limited to listing, for example, it is better to find a bank to borrow from a core technology and market. A postdoctoral fellow at Tianjin University developed a biopharmaceutical technology that supplies Pfizer, the world's largest pharmaceutical company, with a $5 million cost of less than $1 million.

As far as your question is concerned, the point is that most businesses don't have that strong advantage, and if there is a large amount of money to support it, at least the business may grow faster or die faster, in terms of risk. If Ping An Insurance really raised 160 billion yuan at the beginning of this year, if there was no approval from the first level, Ping An really invested the money in the overseas financial industry, and now it is really going bankrupt, investing less than 20 billion yuan and now losing 15 billion yuan, if the money is Ma Mingzhe's own, will he invest like this?

There are also some companies that have done a good job in listing, such as Microsoft in the United States, a small and medium-sized enterprise is now one of the world's top two enterprises, and it is unlikely that there will be no capital market, at least many years later.

Listing means fame and fortune to the company itself and its senior executives. Fame and fortune, who wouldn't want to? I'm dreaming about it. After all, a company that is conditionally listed but not listed is an example.

And you have to realize that financing is the best shortcut for an enterprise to become bigger and stronger, and for some enterprises, capital is also the most critical factor for survival and development.

Moreover, after the listed company issued the original shares, its funds have been used for production and operation, and the rise and fall of ** has not had much impact on him (except for the change in the market value of restricted shares), and the loss is the investors in the secondary market.

Mainly from the financial side! With money, it's easy to develop. Listing is mainly for money!

Hehe, my opinion in this aspect is the same as that of the landlord, for the listing, I feel that it only shows the size of the company, whether it belongs to the large enterprise or the small and medium-sized enterprise sector in this industry.

On the other hand, the non-economic 50 million of listed companies and the economic 50 million (it seems to have changed now) can only be said to be a financing method. Approaching the enterprise to do things is the same as a computer, managing what is software, and assets are hardware. The more money you have, the better.

The registered capital is mainly used for the liquidation of the bankruptcy estate after the bankruptcy of the enterprise. It cannot be said that this enterprise has strong ability to do things.

Here's what we mean by efficiency and speed. Efficient means fast, and fast certainly doesn't mean efficient.

Now that more than 90% of China's enterprises are small and medium-sized enterprises, and most of them are not listed companies, can't they survive in the market?

Therefore, I personally think that the efficiency of the enterprise is mainly reflected in the ability of the enterprise to do things. For example: marketing ability, management ability, research and development ability, cost control ability, core competitiveness and so on.

and not on the registered capital. There is a lot of money in state-owned enterprises, and the registered ones are not counted as national banks, but a large piece of them can go bankrupt! Finally, the high value underestimates the privatization of state-owned enterprises.

Hope it helps, thank you.

Hello dear. There are many reasons why some companies insist on not going public, here are some common reasons: Privatization of operations:

Some companies want to keep their operations privatized in order to have more control over decision-making and the management of the company. Shareholding structure: Some companies may not have a shareholding structure suitable for listing, such as a small number of shareholders or an uneven distribution of shareholdings.

Market performance: Some companies are underperforming in key markets or have a higher risk profile and may not be suitable for listing. Legal Restrictions:

Some industries may have legal restrictions that prevent companies from going public. Capital requirements: Some companies may have access to sufficient capital through other financing methods, such as debt financing or private investment, and therefore do not need to go public.

Company culture: Some companies may have a strong company culture and want to maintain a unique style of doing business and decision-making, and are therefore reluctant to go public. In conclusion, every company's reasons for making decisions are unique, but the above are some of the common ones.