How to look at the middle school conference to destroy students mobile phones

Return to Nanshan (Meng Haoran) at dusk

Damn, dare to smash Lao Tzu's mobile phone, Lao Tzu will kill you.

No, each student should be given an Apple X phone. It is convenient for students to honor the king and eat chicken.

Property rights? Doesn't the teacher understand the Fa? The key is to break through the current puzzle:

With smart phones, students can't restrain themselves, play after class, play in class, and learning is not guaranteed, and some parents can't afford to assist, and can't stand the noisy jump? What to do? From the perspective of the school's limited liability and the legal and regulatory framework, it is the school's rule that it is reasonable to explain the reason, declare the interests, and not bring it back to the school, and the rules must be followed by everyone, and there must be punishment if it is not done.

Repeated ineffectiveness, must be reduced in salary, and the mistake must be made public, up to expulsion. Compulsory education should establish an assessment method, if it is not reached, it should be allowed to repeat a grade, and when it reaches the number of years, it will be changed to non-compulsory and can be expelled, otherwise the current quality control of education is very difficult, in fact, some methods in the 80s and 90s have proved to be more effective and more reasonable from practice.

This is the same answer as "Is it illegal for someone to snatch your phone on the street and smash it?"

Smashing a student's cell phone in a middle school shouldn't be. Mobile phones are the private property of students, and students themselves have the right to dispose of them, and others do not have the right to dispose of them. Even if there is a good reason, smashing someone's phone should never be.

There is essentially no difference between smashing a student's mobile phone and smashing a passerby's mobile phone, and both should be liable for compensation.

But when it comes to dealing with student phones, I've come across a very classic case.

We were in our third year of high school. The day before, the head teacher had just emphasized discipline in the class, and he was not allowed to play with his mobile phone in the class, and if he encountered any more situations in the class playing with his mobile phone, he would be thrown down from the upper floor. But the next day, when we took a mock exam, a few classmates got together to play with their mobile phones.

When the head teacher saw it, he was very helpless. After thinking for a while, I called the student out, talked to him for a while, and then returned to the class and said, since we have emphasized discipline yesterday, whoever plays with the mobile phone will throw it away, then we will do what we say today and throw away this mobile phone.

Then the head teacher walked over to the railing and really threw the phone down. After we saw the phone thrown down, the classmate rushed down to pick up his phone. Later, I learned that the head teacher called him out and told him, you see there is a lawn downstairs, where the grass is more lush, I will throw the phone into the grass later, so that you will not fall and get hurt, you run down again, quickly pick it up.

After this incident, no one in our class played with their mobile phones anymore, and that classmate also praised the class teacher.

Mobile phones are the personal property of students, sacrosanct and protected by law, and it is illegal for schools to do so.

Today's middle school students may each have a mobile phone. If it rings in class, it will affect the order of the classroom and interfere with everyone's learning.

Therefore, students should abide by a certain discipline when using mobile phones.

The school is a place for teaching and educating people, and teachers should guide everyone correctly in a civilized and effective way. It is not advisable to simply and rudely smash a student's mobile phone.

If the teacher violates the rules, they will also be punished, you can tell a little story or sing a song to liven up the atmosphere of the class.

Of course, it is not good, and it is strongly questioned that the school is suspected of deliberately destroying property, and if the value is high enough, the school is suspected of committing a crime.

Article 23 of the Public Security Administration Law: Where any of the following acts of infringing on public or private property is not sufficient for criminal punishment, he shall be detained for up to 15 days or given a warning, and may be fined up to 200 yuan alone or concurrently:

1) Stealing, fraudulently obtaining, or stealing a small amount of public or private property;

2) Looting state, collective, or personal property;

3) Extortion of public or private property;

4) Intentionally damaging public or private property.

Criminal Law Article 275:Whoever intentionally destroys public or private property, where the amount is relatively large or there are other serious circumstances, is to be sentenced to up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention or a fine; where the amount is huge or there are other especially serious circumstances, a sentence of between three and seven years imprisonment is to be given.

The larger amount in the Criminal Law is more than 5,000 yuan, and the Public Security Administration Law applies to all amounts below this amount.