History class junior high school is going to talk about World War II, looking for a way to stump t

The history of World War II is relatively transparent, and the course of each war can be queried in the historical materials, so it is difficult for history teachers to find another way to ask some military questions, such as why Japan was able to defeat the US military in Southeast Asia so easily at the beginning of World War II and occupy the initiative in the early stage of the war? Reason: After the end of World War I, countries should not build their navies on a large scale, but they should avoid other countries from owning and threatening their own countries, so the countries negotiated a clause on all the leagues of the navy, and the ratio of the naval forces owned by Britain, the United States, Japan, France, Italy and Germany was 5:

5: At the same time, at that time, Britain imagined that the enemy was still the United States, and he needed Japan to contain the United States in Asia, so after signing this agreement, Britain put forward supplementary terms requiring the U.S. military in Asia not to allow the construction of various defensive measures, and the U.S. military considered that the Pacific Fleet could arrive in Asia in 2 weeks to settle the battle at the outbreak of the Pearl Harbor War, so it also thought that it was not necessary, and the result was that Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, and at the beginning of the war against South Asia, the U.S. military expected the Pacific Fleet to repair holes in Pearl Harbor, Without backup and ground defense, the U.S. military was naturally defeated.

You just ask: Teacher, in the anti-Japanese part of World War II, it was obviously the Kuomintang army that fought to the death, and many soldiers died bravely, why didn't the history books mention a word, but instead wrote about the Battle of the Hundred Regiments and the movement behind enemy lines? Why did the United States aid China like that at that time (sending supplies, sending war readiness, and sending pilots)), and it was not written in the history books?

Why did Stalin engage in terror and defeat Hitler? Why did Ukraine hate Stalin so much (caused by the Stalinist model) and follow the USSR after the war?

You ask the teacher to explain to you in detail the Soviet-German non-aggression pact, how the Soviet Union carved up Poland with Germany, how to forcibly occupy the three Baltic states, how to provoke the Soviet-Finnish war, how to create Katyn**, etc., are all sensitive topics.

You can ask him these questions, such as Sheng Shicai, who is Lin Sen, the truth about the 226 coup, the United States actually had hundreds of aircraft carriers and 100,000 tanks in World War II, and the reason why Hess went to Britain alone If he can answer it without relying on information, he is a god.

I advise you not to fix this uselessness, even if it stumps the teacher, what's the point? Let's think about how to learn it.

You try this, 1, the connection between the map in World War I where Germany challenged the old imperialist countries and the map below?

2. What is the relationship between Hitler's wrist wrench in World War II and the situation map of World War II?

3. Analyze the common reasons for Germany's war in combination with World War I and World War II?

If you want to expand the expansion, you can go to the War of the Century series that you have explored and discovered, there should be more, and you may also find it with Google.

Watch Band of Brothers and the Pacific War, or watch Apocalypse: World War II, but from an American perspective. I don't think you will like to watch anti-Japanese war films shot from a Chinese perspective.

Die for Hitler: The Story of a German Soldier, a documentary filmed from a German perspective, as well as the Wehrmacht series, also from a German perspective. Iwo Jima's letters were taken from a Japanese perspective, although they were taken in the United States.

This ** is a World War II film shot in Germany, there are a lot of them, I hope it will help you.

World War II full-color record, World War II documentary, Pacific War full solution, inch of mountains and rivers, inch of blood, etc., there are many.

Is the teacher female or male? Judging from the situation you introduced, the teacher's teaching method does not involve ideology or idealistic historical view, but the teaching style is a bit out of the stream, which affects the students' perception of the class. If you can't communicate with the teacher privately, you can report the student's opinion to the academic affairs department instead"Report"。

The teacher didn't say a word! Which link do you report.

For the sake of justice, it must be reported!

The biggest characteristic of the student period is rebellion, it is best not to use a harsh way, middle school students are generally sensible, it is best to find them a comparative class, the key is to have a good teacher, so that they can really feel that you are good to them, students will support you, and they will love to learn in class! The class is best scientific and effective, which also requires a lot of time to prepare and think after class!! For example, if you talk about some current events that they like to listen to, you can adjust the class, and everyone can find a little preference in your class, so that you can improve the efficiency of listening to the class!!

The students are not tired after running 10 laps, and the students will definitely not accept it if you are in the car, don't be so strict, the students care about the teacher treating him like this, and if you are strict with them, the students will fix you together1

When you speak, show that you care about them, and it's OK! Actually, they're much simpler than you think. They're just afraid of being ignored!

Students are very competitive, so grades are important to them.

I don't think it's better to learn from the stern way of the old A.

In history class, you should tell more stories about what you want to learn, and be humorous, which will attract students' attention.

If you want all the students to be unconvinced or hate you, you can use it, but if the class is not quiet, advise you to make some expressions or actions to express your anger, otherwise the class will be more difficult to manage.

Taught world history, in one stroke.

Compared with the long history of the world, World War II was just a matter of time and answer.

Do you think the teacher can give you a comprehensive account of this historical event in a 45-minute lesson?

The history of China is not all written in one stroke, and when you take the exam, remember the time, events, and people. You don't have to study the rest, and you won't take the exam anyway.

World War II has no relevance for present and future wars. Our army, on the other hand, is emphasizing winning the next information-based high-tech war. It is impossible to give you another eight years to resist the war, and in future wars everything will highlight the "fast", "accurate" and "ruthless" strike mode.

Is there no World War II content in middle school history books? Or did your school cut all the history classes for science students for the sake of the admission rate!

World War II was going to talk about the Nazis, and the Nazis were going to have racism, and then ......

Do you think the Chinese will publish history? In China, publishing history is called rebellion, and unraveling the truth is called rebellion.

China's historical materials are different from those in the world, and now you can go online and don't want everyone to know the real history. World War II foreigners were at war.

First of all, the easiest first point is to change the way you teach. As a teacher, don't be so rigid when teaching and only talk about exams or books, and occasionally tell some short stories (preferably about history), which can stimulate students' interest in history and favor you as a teacher. Or interact with the students and play some games and competitions.

You can even learn a little trick of inserting a few dialects in the lecture to ensure that the whole class will be lively, and then the learning atmosphere will come up. Personally, I think there are only a few items that can be basically operated.

In addition, students should learn to explain historical events in as simple and plain language as possible. Don't just talk about the background, the overview, the meaning or something, there are a lot of tutorial books, then the teacher still needs to say. Students should be taught to think broadly about historical events on their own

What is the reason for this historical event, whether it is accidental or inevitable; What is its impact, whether it is good or bad; Or ask the students to think about what would have happened to the world if this historical event had not happened, and how it would have become. Students should be taught to think and summarize for themselves, and not just to memorize what is in reference books and textbooks. Of course, the content of the textbook should still be consolidated, after all, the textbook is very authoritative historians and educators after sorting it out before it can be used, and its role should not be belittled.

There is also the need to teach students to cultivate their own learning methods and learning pleasures. Let them be able to independently memorize some historical knowledge in some special methods that suit them. In fact, the students' thinking is very simple, the reason why students don't like history is actually because they can't study well, and they can't get the results they want in every exam, and it is understandable that they will gradually develop an aversion to history, forming a vicious circle.

But if they start to learn it slowly and their grades improve, they will immediately develop a strong interest in history, because history can become a field for expressing their abilities, and students will naturally value it and consciously learn it well, forming a virtuous circle. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to cultivating students' interest in learning and learning ability.

However, what I said is not something that can be achieved in a day or two, and it takes the teacher's long-term focus and hard work to create a class of students with excellent independent thinking ability and generalization ability.

And then what I said, do you understand? Either way, I hope you read it well. After all, education is a profession that some people think of as a livelihood, but some people will regard it as a lifelong career. Hope it helps. All right?

I'll say a few words from a student's point of view, I like history the most, from junior high school to high school, and history exams have always been the first, but most of the teachers are really not very good, very boring, every time I go to class, most of the students in the class are sleeping, and few others are listening, even I rarely listen, because the teacher talks about all the textbooks, I read the books before the exam, and I probably remember them all, what do you use the teacher for? I think that as a teacher, the language should be more vivid, and then talk about some things that are not in the books, of course I know that teachers also have their own struggles, the pace of the lectures, and the school's rigid requirements for grades, and what I said earlier is to let you influence the students, so that some of them fall in love with history, and the rest of the people who are not enlightened, you have to be tougher, such as looking up notes, even if they are all copied, but at least when they copy, it will leave some impressions, and ask more questions or something, and I think that will help somewhat, of course, I'm just a student, and I don't know anything about teaching, just talk about my thoughts, and I hope that more and more of your students will fall in love with history, and I think that's it Your success as a teacher.

If you refer to the entrance examination: send some basic materials for them to memorize, the future is their own, and you have done your duty.

If you are referring to the additional test: you might as well persuade him to give up the additional test as soon as possible, learn Chinese and English seriously, and take a good junior college exam.

Teach the lesson well and let the students listen to it, so that you don't have to spend too much time reviewing after class.

Use vivid language to tell history and interact with students in class to enhance students' interest in history. You can joke about certain things with that classmate, so that students can remember the knowledge points while having fun, and you can use pictographic mnemonics, such as remembering 356 BC as Yamamoto 56 (356), the commander of the Japanese Navy during World War II. Handmade!

History is all fake, and there's a to learn it.

Hitler: The Devil Rises on It Enough This movie tells how Hitler rose.

When I first entered junior high school, I was impressed by the first history lesson. Because I knew a teacher I had never met before.

The teacher is not tall, white, and has a pair of glasses on the bridge of his nose, which looks very bookish. When he introduced himself, he was even more unique, opening his mouth with "Hello everyone! In the future, I will teach you the history of the rock reed cover!

Our surname is Song", according to legend, he is still a descendant of the nobility! Hearing this, the whole class burst into laughter, and I burst into tears, thinking: I really deserve to be a history teacher, and the introductions are all with the flavor of history and literature!

After a period of rough trouble, "what is my surname" also became a good story among students! However, the teacher's movements are more "classic" in class! He propped up the podium with both hands, leaned forward, one leg in front and one leg back, and shook his head when he spoke, which was really like the ancient students when they memorized the Analects!

So, I spent the whole class laughing. I am proud of the teacher's humor!

What makes Mr. Song different from others is that he has innovative ideas! Generally, the teacher teaches, but one day Teacher Song suddenly wanted us to prepare for class, and we complained bitterly, so we had to go home and work hard. And I had to make the slides myself.

On that day, I was selected to give a lecture. But I really have to thank the teacher, who let me know the hard work of being a teacher, and at the same time let me know the joy of learning history, so that I can really fall in love with history! The teacher's innovation makes us enter a new historical world!

I am so proud of this innovative teacher!

But in fact, what I am most proud of is the charm of the teacher! His classes are easy and enjoyable, but they can learn a lot. For example, when a teacher lectures a lesson, he often tells us many historical stories, as well as many famous quotes from the "Historical Records".

He will also make remarks in relation to the realities of life and the current situation of society. But we are not the audience, but actively participated, and the class was like a discussion! Everyone had a smile on their faces!

So I think the teacher is very charismatic, and sometimes I don't think of him as a teacher, but a friend who talks about everything. Because of this, everyone in the class fell in love with history class, and of course, the history grades were among the best in the whole grade! Not only that, but we all reached the relationship of being brothers and sisters with our teachers.

Every time we had a history lesson, we would use a slide to type the words "Welcome to Fa Ge"! Every time the teacher comes, he laughs, and we laugh along! So we are proud to have such a teacher with an appeal index of more than 10,000 points!

When I came to junior high school, I was glad that I could meet such a teacher, but unfortunately I could only get along with the teacher for three years! Either way, I'll never forget!