Indefinite integral, where did the question 1 3 come from?

Updated on educate 2024-05-03
6 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    x/(1+x∧3)dx

    Let x (1+x 3)=x [(1+x)(1-x+x 2)]=a (1+x)+(bx+c) (1-x+x 2).

    The solution yields a=-1 3, b=1 3, and c=1 3

    Original = [1 3) (1+x)+(1 3)(x+1) (1-x+x 2)]dx

    1/3)ln|1+x|+(1/3)∫(1+x)/(1-x+x^2)dx

    where (1+x) (1-x+x 2)dx

    1/2)∫[2x-1)/(1-x+x^2)+3/(1-x+x^2)]dx

    1/2)∫1/(1-x+x^2)d(1-x+x^2)+(3/2)∫1/(1-x+x^2)dx

    1/2)ln(1-x+x^2)+(3/2)∫1/[(x-1/2)^2+3/4]dx

    1/2)ln(1-x+x^2)+2∫1/dx

    1 2)ln(1-x+x 2)+2* 3 2 1 d[(2 this elimination 3)(x-1 2)].

    1 2) LN(1-x+x 2)+3arctan[(type 2 or 3)(x-1 2)]+c

    x/(1+x∧3)dx

    1/3)ln|1+x|+(1 6)ln(1-x+x 2)+(3 3)arctan[(2 3)(x-1 Bu Pavu2)]+c

    1/6)ln[(1-x+x^2)/(1+x)^2]+(3/3)arctan[(2x-1)/√3)]+c

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    1 3 times under the root number (2-3x) dx

    2-3x) (-1 to the 3rd power] dx

    2-3x) to the power (-1 3)] *1 3) d(2-3x) (-1 3) * (3 2) * (2-3x) + (2 3) to the power (2) 3 + c (-1 2) * (2-3x).

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Summary. For x, 82 2 is for t and is the (penultimate one) 1 (3 x+1) indefinite integral.

    Teacher, why is this question equal to 3ln3?

    I've figured this out, but why is the answer to that definite integral 3ln3?

    Pro, the indefinite integral is calculated as the first graph.

    Bring in the upper and lower limits and you get 3ln3 <>

    Generally, this kind of irrational integral (the root number integral is to directly make a t=irrational commutation, and then replace it with a rational integral).

    The kind of square term under the root number is generally the triangular exchange <>< used

    However, the definite integral is not a limit for the exchange of yuan.

    But I'm calculating indefinite integrals<>

    So it's not 2 2 no.

    Your problem is to find indefinite integrals, and it is the same to calculate indefinite integrals and bring them into the upper and lower bounds.

    Looking at the final result, it would be good to bring in the upper limit 8 and 2.

    It is possible to bring in x, to bring in 82 and 2 to bring in to t (penultimate one). The generation t is the generation t = 2, not the 2 2 that the relatives say, because t = 3 x3 8 = 2

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Hello, this question should be more troublesome.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Let t=(1+x) root number 2

    d(x) = root number 2 * dt

    Denominator = (root number 2 * t) 2 + (root number 2) 2 denominator is squared out of the root number 2, and the numerator is the root number 2

    You get 1 root number 2

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    The method is shown in the figure below, please check it carefully, and I wish you a happy study:

Related questions
11 answers2024-05-03

Indefinite integral concept.

In differential calculus we already know that if the equation for a body to move in a straight line is s=f(t), the instantaneous velocity of the object is known v=f(t), and the law of motion of the object is required to be s=f(t). This is obviously a question of reversing the demand for the "original function" from the derivative of the function, and that's what this section is going to discuss. >>>More

14 answers2024-05-03

dx means: the increment of the independent variable x.

The indefinite integral contains dx because the indefinite integral is the inverse of the differential, not the inverse of the derivative. >>>More

6 answers2024-05-03

Original = dx (x 2-4x+4-4).

d(x-2) [(x-2) 2-4] (becomes derivative(x-2), the formula remains unchanged). >>>More

10 answers2024-05-03

i=∫(secx)^3dx=(1/2)×(secxtanx+ln|secx+tanx|)+c

The process is as follows: >>>More

11 answers2024-05-03

None of them are right: the reason:

1. Two objects of the same material and the same volume must have the same weight, and it is impossible to be heavy or light. >>>More