Was Kung Fu Practical in Fighting?

Hehe, I'm the most authoritative on this question. Tell you clearly, when you practice martial arts to the realm of transformation, you can defeat a hundred with one enemy. Of course, this is an exaggeration, but for ten, for eight is completely fine.

Why don't people believe in martial arts anymore? Because now there is no need for survival, people have become weaker, and in the era of cold weapons, people have become stronger in order to survive, and they will naturally be stronger. For example, if Guan Yu comes to the present, you four or five thugs pick up a knife to rob him of money, aren't you thugs looking for death?

People have come back from the battlefield and have never seen anything. Let me tell you, martial arts talk about psychological quality and training, at least I have practiced and experienced, and it is no problem to deal with three or four. Finally, to use an analogy, if you were a Marine who went to Somalia and experienced a life-and-death struggle but did not die, and returned to real life, would you still be afraid of seven or eight thugs?

When you see them, they're just children.

Kung Fu is definitely useful, but if you want to learn a little fur, you can't beat people, it's not Chinese kung fu, it's not good that you can't learn it.

Kung Fu is one by practice, more practice, more competition (that is, you say challenges everywhere) and one's own learning ability (the said talent,).

Then it is necessary to find a good teacher (the teacher does not say that the number of championships must be great, the teacher must be able to tap the potential of students and give stimulation, this is a good teacher).

However, everything on TV is fake and exaggerated, including Bruce Lee's movies, which are also exaggerated and embellished.

It was practical in ancient times, but it is not practical in modern times, and the speed of guns and cannons is much more powerful than martial arts.

It's practical, but it's a fighting martial art, and it's not as powerful as it is on TV, but if you practice well, you should be fine with one against ten.

It can't be believed in TV dramas, for example, the protagonist in TV can fight back after being shot, showing that it is difficult to have the ability to fight back when he is hit by a hand at close range.

Kung fu is of course practical, even if taekwondo or something is just the surface of martial arts, but many dynasties in history have banned martial arts, and now they are also advocating martial arts fitness, rather than self-defense, which has a great impact on the development and inheritance of martial arts, in addition, martial arts can not be practiced overnight, it often takes more than ten years, and it is not enough to practice routine boxing, but also to fight, not only to fight with people who learn kung fu, but also to fight with people from other schools of kung fu, and now they lack this condition, It is estimated that the people competing in the current sports channel are training strength rather than skills, and they themselves lack actual combat training.

Of course, it is practical, but it depends on your practical flexibility, and if you can use it flexibly, everything will be useful.

It's not practical, in fact, many TV dramas now deify kung fu, and it's not like that.

The kind in film and television dramas is an artistically exaggerated ......

In fact, it should still be a useful ......

It depends on how flexible you are.

The ancients used a lot of poison and hidden weapons.

In the era of cold weapons, it is important to pay attention to formations, tactics, and individual battles.

The so-called martial arts or martial arts only appeared in martial arts after the Ming and Qing dynasties. Prior to this, there was no detailed documentation in the literature. Those who are physically strong obviously want to take advantage of the era of cold weapons.