Nikon DSLR does not stabilize the plus stabilization lens

The landlord is really funny.

If you don't have a lens, you can see the reflector in the fuselage directly, and you don't even have a lens, and you still take some photos.

The landlord has ever seen a camera without lenses? Can the sensor be imaged directly when it is exposed?

Of course, there must be a lens, and the lens is a part of the camera, but there are many types of lenses, and you can choose according to your needs.

It is estimated that the landlord's funds are relatively tight, and he can buy a set of lenses, that is, he can buy a set of lenses, and there is a lens in the package.

This lens doesn't perform very well, but it's cheap.

It is recommended that the landlord learn the basics.

The entry machine is to buy a set of Nikon D3000 18-55 lenses with an invoice for 3500 yuan.

There's really not much to study about entry-level machines.

If you don't buy a lens, you have a gun and no bullets, and the difference between the lens is equivalent to whether you shoot at close range or from a distance, that is to say, what you shoot in your daily life is a landscape or a person to choose according to what you shoot.

As for the brand, each has its own strengths, there is no way to compare, the key is to see what you shoot and what you use.

A DSLR ...... without a lens

Is it a set?

There are very few sets of lenses that do not have image stabilization, and only Sony has a few models of body image stabilization.

Also, there are so many cameras of these brands, and the performance of different models is different, how to analyze it?

1.Do you mean to buy the camera first, and you haven't thought about which one to buy? This must be considered together.

2.In addition to Pentax, there is also Sony for body stabilization.

Do you mean you have a little white head? In this case, it is recommended to buy Canon 5D Invincible Rabbit, then you don't need to buy lenses, other brands are not compatible with Xiaobai.

LZ, SLR is just a fuselage, and there is no way to take pictures with just one fuselage, which means that there are no eyes and you can't see things.

Anti-shake or not, it doesn't matter, the ISO opening high point is it

How do you take pictures without buying lenses?

Sony's mirrorless system has a body with stabilization and a lens with stabilization. Regardless of where the stabilization components are located, they are all optical image stabilization.

Fuselage anti-shake Jixiang large body anti-shake: It can provide jitter compensation for a total of 5 axes: up and down + left and right swing, horizontal + longitudinal translation, and rotation, and the corresponding products are A6500, A7II, A7RII, A7SII, A7III, A7RIII and A9.

Among them, the A7RIII also achieves pixel shift (full color sampling) shooting through body stabilization.

Lens image stabilization Lens image stabilization: It can provide shake compensation for a total of 2 axes of up and down + left and right swing. Compatible with products with the "OSS" logo on Sony's original lenses.

When the anti-shake body and the anti-shake lens are combined, in most cases, the body and lens can be coordinated to achieve anti-shake, that is, the body provides lateral pan + longitudinal pan and rotation compensation, and the lens provides up and down + left and right swing compensation.

Therefore, for Sony's mirrorless system, the stabilization effect when using a telephoto lens mainly depends on the lens.

However, stabilization isn't a panacea, and it's important to have a shutter speed to match when shooting fast-moving subjects.

In addition, there is also a congenital disadvantage of body stabilization: it changes the way CMOS and the body are fixed, which affects the heat dissipation performance of CMOS, and then affects the thermal noise level for a long time.

The bad news is that this change and impact has nothing to do with whether or not in-body stabilization is enabled, the good news is that all in-body stabilization cameras have this problem;

And Sony A7III, A7RIII, A9 have done a relatively good job in heat dissipation.

The effect of body stabilization is similar to that of the lens, so many lenses have an image stabilization function, and even if the camera is not designed with an image stabilization function, it will not have much effect on shooting.

Judging from the effect after shooting**, there is not much difference between body stabilization and lens stabilization.

But judging from the filming process, there are still some differences between the two. If you have stabilization of the lens, you can clearly feel the effect of stabilization when framing and composing the image in the viewfinder, and when you turn it on, you will feel that the movement of the object becomes slow and smooth. In the case of in-body stabilization, the stabilization effect is not noticeable in the viewfinder, and since in-body stabilization is not tailored to each lens, there may be differences in stabilization when using different lenses.

To sum up, Canon and Nikon basically use the function of lens image stabilization, but in fact, some SLRs now have body image stabilization performance, such as Sony and Pentax. This is also the difference in the understanding of anti-shake by different manufacturers.

SLR cameras mainly support the lens stabilization function.

Some are body support for image stabilization, and most are lens support.

Nowadays, the stabilization function is usually placed inside the lens! This can be different depending on the lens needs different levels of stabilization! I can maximize the effectiveness of the battery!

If you want to stabilize the body, you need to adjust the power to the maximum so that all lenses can be stabilized! This has an impact on the life of the battery! Of course, this is only one aspect, there are many other reasons!

Therefore, the body stabilization was in the past, and now the camera manufacturers have improved! Body stabilization has been changed in every lens! And some lenses don't use stabilization at all!

This also saves costs!

Some are supported, like Sony's DSLR.

There is a safety shutter for taking pictures, which is roughly the reciprocal of the focal length of the lens, such as 18-135 lenses, using 18 ends, the safety shutter is 1 18 seconds, and the 135 end is 1 135 seconds.

The shutter is lower than the reciprocal of the focal length, which may reflect the beating of the heart, breathing and shaking of the hand to **, ** will be "paste".

This person is just a person, and the person who has practiced the iron hand skills well, the safety shutter can be relatively low.

Generally, the stabilization can make the ** 3-4 stops lower than the safety shutter not "mush".

In addition, there are two types of image stabilization: body image stabilization and lens image stabilization.

Fuselage anti-shake is the displacement of the image sensor to correct the shake,This anti-shake effect is only reflected in the **,The effect is not visible from the viewfinder。 Machines with in-body stabilization have stabilization using any lens, and the cost of stabilization is relatively low.

Lens stabilization relies on the displacement of the lens stabilization component to achieve stabilization, and you can intuitively see the stabilization effect in the viewfinder. On the other hand, because each lens needs to have its own anti-shake component, the lens ** is relatively high, usually 1000 more expensive than the same specification without anti-shake

According to the safety shutter, it is recommended that standard zoom lenses such as 18-55 should be used without an anti-shake lens. For telephoto lenses such as 70-200, image stabilization is more necessary.

In addition, some card machines also have pseudo-image stabilization such as "natural image stabilization" and "electronic image stabilization", which is to improve iOS sensitivity and sacrifice image quality to achieve a safe shutter, which is meaningless.

It doesn't matter whether the lens is stabilized or not under 50mm, and the lens stabilization above 135mm is of course a very useful function, and it is not meaningful for ultra-wide-angle stabilization below 24mm.

It's best to have image stabilization, which will allow you to shoot better at lower shutter speeds**, resulting in lower ISO values and better image quality, but if the aperture is wide enough, it's okay to have none.

Yes, stabilization is practical. However, you have to consider it comprehensively, for example, ISO can be used as image stabilization, but the resolution is poor.