Why is it that any painting looks better if it is framed and placed in an art museum?

Recently, someone asked me why any painting looks better if it is framed and placed in an art museum.

I think that because the average viewer does not have the ability to interpret the exhibits and comment on the value of the exhibits, they can only trust the exhibits through a ritual of trust given by others, such as a museum exhibition.

Museum collections, often used to mislead the public. For a while, the "museum collection" of the collection was not because the objects had some good qualities, but in the eyes of the museum, the works were simply "more representative" and "more in line with the purpose of the museum", and they were displayed in the museum simply because they were "more memorable" rather than "better".

Based on the ontological theory of art value, if the ontology of art does not change, its value will remain unchanged, and what will change is only people's opinions and judgments. If we change the perspective of things and build a theory based on the value of art, perhaps the answer will be different. The value of art, especially modern art, needs to be reconstructed.

The same painting, even if one of its atoms has not changed, does not deserve the same value as a museum. It is also an integral part of the value of the work, because these actions participate in the construction of the value of the work.

Framing is a form of cultural production, and picture frames are just as important as paintings. It makes every thing in the box an attractive thing that people can learn to **. The frame itself is responsible for the internal connection of the drawing, and everything that has a place in the frame will be considered art and will have priority, which has nothing to do with the frame itself at all.

On the other hand, many paintings have not been able to support the value of art since modern times.

But some paintings do not have a frame, especially modern ones. Modern painting, especially abstract painting, does not reflect the real world. They are usually borderless, but some have frames that give a strange feel.

This has a window frame that has a different meaning than the picture frame above. We are faced with a framework that can generate an expectation, the expectation of wanting to see the real world of the physical world, and if the content of the painting does not meet the expectations, we naturally feel strange.

All in all, the frame does not actually increase the artistic value of the painting, but in the eyes of the layman, it is only advanced if it has a frame.

I myself may not be called an average listener, I have a sense of judgment and appreciation for my work. But I think more than once, the studio had it the day before, and I thought it was a mediocre work, and the next day I went to the museum to exhibit it, and I really felt that the quality of the work would improve, and this increase would be from a realistic point of view, and then it would become rational appreciation.

Hundreds of years have been part of the work, and we have also ** many screens to bring the visual impact of the theoretical foundations of oil painting, the work of Manet at the Musée d'OrsayIn the middle is a painting of three boys coming down to play the flute, which is not too largeFrom the perspective of visual psychology, this way is not only a decorative frame, but also highlights the content of the picture, which will indeed bring a more pleasant ** experience in vision.

The Musée d'Orsay, the source of the world, is a good example of this famous courbet courbet**, the original size was not very large46 55 cm, we note that this ** is not a square box。Its work only brings many concentric squares, superimpositions of squares to the whole, and their angles bring the visual effect of "and". Courbet is the role of the Orsay in the large size of the oil painting front frame, the visual public is not obvious.

In this scene, we usually see far and near distances away from paintings, paintings, and we can even feel that the giant frame shown in the picture will look bloatedClosed, ignoring the frame, immersed in the details of the work。b, experience is expressed in numerous paintings, I don't know if you haven't noticed, in paintings after modern painting, the appearance of the picture seems more and more scarce. When we look at a series of abstract paintings, do you remember if the works were framed and framed?

The first:

According to the material, it can be divided into:

Wooden picture frame. The inner core material is wood moldings made of wood Features: Weight: light, soft, easy to bend, and cannot bear large weight of paintings.

Synthetic frame.

The inner core material is a wooden line with a synthetic material texture Features: Weight: Medium Hard, not easy to bend, and can bear a large weight of the painting.

The rest of the expression depends on the type of painting, if you want to paint a classicist painting, it is best to choose a high-end frame with irises to frame. If you draw a post-modern one, then irises won't work. As for what to use, I chose for myself.

The second: framing formYou have listed a frameless painting, that is unframed, nail gun and canvas + wooden frame, which are all inner frames. It's good to add the outer frame after painting.,I've never seen other framing forms.。。。

Third: I don't personally see many oil paintings, but there are various proportions, and some even look quite wide frames, but the picture size is very small. It is better to judge according to the painting, some large-format paintings are not necessarily good-looking with a wide frame, and some small-format paintings with a large frame are not necessarily good-looking.

There's no set proportion.