The children of the poor are in charge of the debate and the opposing speech

It is a fact that it can be seen from the famous "Coleman Report" that the financial situation of a family affects the academic performance of a child in school. We have done a survey, and the results show that despite the phenomenon that the children of the poor are in charge of the family early, generally speaking, if the parents' economic income is low, then the children's academic performance is low; Although there is a phenomenon of "never being a great man", generally speaking, if the parents' financial income is higher, then the child's academic performance is generally higher.

Although poverty is an important educational resource, it is not necessarily that the poorer it is, the better it is for children's development. Parents need to provide their children with the most basic cultural resources, so as not to let their children fall into the abyss of inferiority. Some poor children, thinking that they are poor, will no longer work hard, willing to fall into the social subsistence allowance first-class, so to say, "the children of the poor are in charge of the family", the main thing is not to say "poor", but to know how to "self-improvement", is it said that the children of rich families will not be in charge of the family early, this is a prejudice, there are many children of rich families, still very young, they live independently, develop their careers, and inherit the family business.

People know and understand how the children of the rich are, and crown them with the word "stubborn", this is a kind of assumption, such people are only a small number, and most of them are caused by some problems such as parents who do not take care of their children, do not care, think that they can maintain family ties with money, and children want to make mistakes and live a luxurious life to attract the attention of their parents.

I disagree, life is like a coin, there are hardships and beauty, and the children of the poor can only see the hard side.

As the saying goes, "The children of the poor are in charge of the house early." "The environment has a certain impact on people's growth. People in adversity are more able to face themselves, tap their courage and great potential, and work hard to achieve success.

As far as success is concerned, whether it is good or bad, it is an external cause, and it depends on the internal cause to play a role. In this way, we can explain why "since ancient times, heroes have been poor and lowly, and young and great men", because people in good times are easily confused, and they are often greedy for enjoyment, do not know how to forge ahead, and do not know what suffering is. And how can people who have no ambition and no enterprising spirit become successful?

People in adversity are different, they have suffered a lot, struggled with fate and difficulties again and again, and most of them have set lofty ambitions and firm goals to get out of adversity. People don't have pressure to look up, they don't have motivation to forge ahead, and once they have both, they will unleash their amazing potential. This is exactly what people in good times generally don't have.