Ouye 2 0 ATX660 What are the advantages and disadvantages of ATX670, mainly going to and from school

Hello Mountain Bike Bug Tour" will be happy to help you with your questions about mountain bikes, and our team welcomes you to join

All three cars are low-end cars from Giant.

Ouye is an urban off-road vehicle, the lowest positioning, ATX660, ATX670 is barely positioned in the entry mountain bike, slightly better than Ouye, of course, ATX670 configuration is more ** and more expensive, if you want to buy a car with more stable performance, these three selected ATX670 is OK

ATX660 Market**1298. This model has a lot of improvements over the details of the Giant Ono in the field, including improved cranksets, hubs, wheels, and rims. So more explanation of durable, cost-effective good, if you want to buy Ouye friends suggest that you add 200 yuan to buy this model.

ATX670 Market**1398. The biggest difference between this model and the former ATX660 is the fork. The trendy appearance and paint make him more sought after by young people.

The details have been upgraded to quick-release wheels, and the shape of the car structure has also been slightly changed, and the front beam has become lower, so it has become the choice of many ladies.

Just look at the livery and like to buy it, there is no actual difference between these three cars, they are all scooters.

In terms of frame, the gap between Ouye and ATX6 series is not large, and there is no actual difference in the front fork and rear derailleur finger dial, which can be chosen depending on your paint preference.

Seat pliers x city set.

If it's for commuting, it's ATX660, and if it's better, it's ATX690, both of which are fine-toothed tires with higher efficiency than large-tooth tires. Merida's Warrior 550 is also a fine-tooth tire, if you want a more durable car, you can also consider this one, in the official introduction, this car is designed for students to go to school, very suitable for commuting, but also very resistant to manufacturing. Giant and Merida can't say who is better than who***, at this price point the cost performance is about the same, the Warrior's frame seems to be a little heavier, and there is no obvious feeling in riding.

Of course, the ATX6 will not be blown by the wind as you say, ......If you want to ride in the rain, then recommend Hunter, or Meridacro, Crowe is a steel-framed commuter car, relatively speaking, the steel frame is heavier, and it is stronger, and you can choose to test ride it without feeling very heavy. If you're not riding in the rain, take the Warrior 550 or ATX660 690. Happy riding!

It's cost-effective. There is nothing cost-effective for a car at this price, ** put that. 560 could be better, though. To be honest, I was struggling with these cars before, and the models were all the same, but I still chose the 560. It's very convenient to get on the train with a quick release.

It's all entry-level, and there's not much room for later upgrades, so it's recommended that it's the cheapest.

If you modify it in the future... 670 bar. Both have been ridden (classmates'. I am 770tat.

660 vs. 670:

1. The speed is the same, but the frame is different, the 660 is a round tube, and the 670 is a T-tube.

The suspension fork is actually the same as the 670, and the tires are the same, but the rims will be different. The rims of the 670 have rivets, the 660 does not. The above differences are based on the comparison of **660 and 670.

660 is the most cost-effective in the 6 series, 660 is recommended.

Model:ATX660 [Size]:26*17m-19m [Frame]:

08'**giant aluminum alloy round tube hard mold frame; Hard mold logo [fork]: TGS aluminum shoulder suspension fork [Shifting system]: SHIMANO 21S [Hub]:

Aluminum alloy hub [rim]: aluminum alloy double-layer rim [tire]: kenda26* tire [crank]:

Sugino, aluminum alloy [chain]: KMC, anti-rust silent function [car case]: aluminum alloy clamp [other]:

3D design of the head tube logo and hard molding, plus aluminum; Shimano EF29 integrated handlebar; aluminum alloy parts; velo bacteriostatic grips; Special rear-mounted parking rack ATX660 as an entry-level model of a professional mountain transmission vehicle has the following characteristics: 1. Light weight, as a mountain bike, light weight is a must, easy to carry, convenient for trekking through mountains and rivers. 2. The transmission system is very flexible and effective.

The SHIMANO 21-speed shifting system used is a name-brand shifting system that is characterized by safety and reliability. 3. The front shock absorption system is very effective, riding 60 kilometers, up and down the road, there will be basically no fatigue and soreness of the forearm. 4. The design of the whole vehicle is more practical and reasonable, such as:

The seat is designed to be high and low using only one clip, which is very easy and quick to adjust. 5. The quality assurance of Giant professional racing cars, all parts have been made in sufficient quantities, and there is indeed a professional demeanor. Of course, in addition to the advantages, there are also some shortcomings, after all, it is a professional entry model.

**The ATX660 is not as soft as the old model, which makes the PP easy to fatigue during riding. According to riders, if you wear a soft saddle and a professional jersey, the fatigue of PP will be reduced.

Giant ATX670

Giant ATX670ATX670 [Size]: 26*17m-19m [Frame]: Giant Advanced Aluminum Alloy Hard Molded Frame [Fork]:

TGS aluminum alloy suspension fork [Shifting system]: Shimano Tourney 21S [Hub]: Aluminum alloy hub [Rim]:

Aluminum alloy double-layer rim [Tire]: Jianda 26* tire [Crank]: Sugino, Aluminum alloy [Chain]:

KMC, anti-rust silent function [Saddle]: Velo seat cushion [Receiver]: Aluminum alloy clamp [Other]:

Shimano EF29 integrated handlebar; aluminum alloy parts; velo bacteriostatic grips; Dedicated rear-mounted parking racks.

In fact, it's about the same, that is, 670 is a hundred more than 660, and 670 is recommended

660 is the most cost-effective in the 6 series In fact, there is no difference But it is better to buy ** 660 Compared with 670 The speed is the same But the frame is different 660 is a round tube 670 is a T-tube Personally, I think it is almost the same 660 and 670 suspension forks are actually the same The tires are also the same But the rim will be different 670 rims have rivets 660 does not The above differences are in accordance with the comparison between **660 and 670 It is recommended that you still buy 660 In fact, the difference between these two cars is not important By the way, the braking system uses V brakes It is also the same You will not upgrade in the future The 100 yuan saved can buy some small things such as lights Remember that you must ** The old one is actually very rubbish and **** is not much different.

There is no difference, they are all vegetable carts. Just buy what you like.

atx670；This year, the hub can not be modified disc brake. The frame can be modified with disc brakes and ATX690; The 2011 ATX6 series is the king of value for money, and the 2011 model year 690 is very cost-effective.

Plains forgiveness; I haven't heard of it, I haven't seen it.

Ou Ye; Urban recreational vehicle, very low-end. Light off-road is possible. Urban mountain bikes.

Sum up. Recommend 690 This year's 690 configuration is a good deal. Get it. If you have money, go straight to the 770 (740 750 is prone to break the bottom bracket, fork).

Forever 28, Ferrari in the bike! It's both physical and economical, and the speed depends mainly on your personal ability, a man's favorite!

On the first floor, you don't have to listen, and you don't know anything about it. ATX Pro is the retail shelf of the ATX series 09 model 780, 10 model 980. In addition, 1780 with pro is a waste, pro car at least 4000, otherwise sorry for the shelf.

750 is the best, ** to change the disc brake to bb5, the configuration is not very bad, and the painting is also good.

The mountain is still ATX-pro is better about 1780 and it is also easy to use!!

690,Personally, I think the price is about the same.,There are various functions.,It's also easier to find v.。 It doesn't seem easy to play badly.

I bought an ATX750 and I personally think it's a very good car! It is recommended to buy.

To be honest, the difference is not too big, but the 660 of the 13 models is still more recommended. It's hard to say whether the speed is good or bad, depending on who you compare with (it must be better than Fuji-Da), in fact, the main consideration is comfort when traveling. You can lend Giant to one of your classmates to ride for two days, and I think he'll throw Fujitec away.

A group of Giant's trust, Fujitec** is not good'For example? Said the frame was bad and the ride was broken? The same thing used for shifting, saying that the details are not good, the Giant's car cover is faded and painted, this is the so-called good details?

The 670 bought by the landlord is still good, but the gap with the 660 is not very big, Giant is not bad, but some people say that Fujita is not good, what qualifications are there? They are the first batch of products that have been exempted from national inspection, and some people don't call them if they don't understand. The cost performance of going to Fujita car by yourself.

It's not a big difference, if you use it for school, you can buy it if it's low in your local area.

The school recommendation is 670, and I ride the 670. Good shifting, 3 front and 7 rear. Generally about 1500 yuan.

There is no difference in configuration, 21 speeds, enough for school. Fuji-ta forget it, don't think about it.

More than 690 is good, just a few hundred more is not a level.