What does Hegel mean when he says that the hand detached from the body is the hand in name 10

It means that a hand that is detached from the body is not a hand. Think about it, when the hand is separated from the body, it loses its function, and the hand without the body can do nothing. This is in philosophy about the relationship between the whole and the parts.

1) Meaning: The whole refers to the overall situation and the whole process of development of things, and it is one in terms of quantity; Parts are the parts of things and the stages of development, and in terms of quantity it is many.

2) Relationship: Difference: The whole is dominant, the whole commands the parts, and has functions that the parts do not have; The part is in a dominant position in the existence and development of things, and the part is subordinate to and serves the whole.

Connection: The whole is made up of parts, and without the parts, the whole ceases to exist. The function of the part and its changes will affect the function of the whole, and the function of the key parts and its changes even play a decisive role in the function of the whole; A part is a part of a whole, and without the whole, a part does not become a part.

The overall functional state and its changes can also affect the part.

2. What is the importance of grasping the relationship between the whole and the parts?

1) We should establish the concept of the overall situation, base ourselves on the whole, coordinate the overall situation, choose the best plan, and achieve the optimal goal of the whole, so as to achieve the overall function is greater than the sum of the parts of the function;

2) We must pay attention to the role of the part, do a good job of the part, and use the development of the part to promote the development of the whole.

Although a hand that has been detached from the body is still called a hand, it has lost its actual role as a hand.

The hand has its material form and its conscious form, and the concept of the hand can be defined by metaphysical methods, and this concept is the meaning of the hand.

To separate the hand from the body is to separate the part from the whole, the whole is organic and the part is inanimate, or when the hand effectively performs the instructions of consciousness in the body and expresses the meaning of its existence, it is not a nominal (defined or conceptualized) hand, otherwise a lifeless hand stripped of the organic subject is just an objective substance that completely implements the objective laws without the slightest embodiment of "I" (autonomous), and such a hand is no different from a stone, Therefore, when the hand is detached from the body, we have no choice but to materialize it in the name of objectivity.

There is no point in detaching the parts from the whole.

The philosopher's name is the dialectic.

For example, if a hand is cut off from the body, it can be called a hand, but it is no longer a hand. This sentence indicates:

Everything is a whole and at the same time contains parts, and the whole and the parts are interdependent. The whole is made up of parts, and the whole depends on the parts. The part is a part of the whole, and the part that is separated from the whole loses its original nature and function, and the part depends on the whole, and only from the whole can the part be truly known.

The so-called hand is not only a concrete object, but also contains its function as a part of the human body, so the first word of the hand refers to the hand contained in the whole of the person, including the functions it can achieve, the second word of the hand is only an objective definition of the name of the object, and the third word of the hand is the same as the first.

Answer] Potato trap: a, c, d

A person's hands and body are part and whole. Materialist dialectics holds that the whole and the parts are inseparable.

The whole is composed of parts, and the formation of the overall function is inseparable from the original function of the part. A part is a part of a whole, and a part of a part no longer has the function of a part if it leaves the whole. The whole is not a simple sum of parts.

ACD is selected for this question.

The severed hand is detached from his ontology, so it is not a hand in the original sense, which embodies the principle of the relationship between the whole and the part in philosophy. That is, the part cannot exist in isolation from the whole.

Difference: The connotation of the two is different: the whole refers to the organic unity formed by the interconnection of various internal elements of things and the whole process of its development. Part refers to the various aspects, elements and stages of the whole process of development that make up things.

The status and function of the two are different. The whole is dominant, commanding the parts; The whole has a function that some of them do not have at all. When the parts form a whole with a reasonable structure, the whole has a completely new function, and the function of the whole will be greater than the sum of the functions of the parts.

When the parts form a whole with a poor structure, the function of the whole is impaired.

Connection: First, the whole and the part are inseparable. The whole is composed of parts, and the formation of the overall function is inseparable from the original function of the part. A part is a part of a whole, and a part no longer functions as a part without the whole.

Second, the whole and the part are mutually influential. The overall performance status and its changes will affect the performance status and changes of some parts; Conversely, the part also restricts the whole, and even under certain conditions, the performance of the key part will play a decisive role in the performance state of the whole.

Third, the status of the whole and the parts can be transformed under certain conditions.