There is a question about whether oral communication debate in the fifth unit of the sixth grade is

You're on the opposite side, right? It's really hard to debate.

According to monitoring and analysis in various places, automobile exhaust emissions have accounted for about 85% of air pollution sources. For example, the daily exceedance rate of sulfur dioxide concentration in the central area of Beijing is 10% to 15%, the daily exceedance rate of carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxide concentration is 60 to 70, and the air pollution exceeds the national secondary standard by 1 to 3 times at the maximum concentration.

Farmers in developing countries suffer from pesticide poisoning for 2 million people every year due to lack of scientific knowledge and safety measures, of which 40,000 people die, an average of 28 people every 10 minutes and 1 person every 17 minutes!

The intense light waves of the atomic bomb** blinded thousands of people; 1 billion degrees of heat, turning everything to ashes; Radioactive rain slows some people to death over the next 20 years; The violent wind formed by the shock wave destroyed all the buildings, and one part is the harm to people: (1) the high incidence of radiation diseases such as cancer and leukemia (2) the disability of newborns (3) the loss of human sexual function (4) the high incidence of ** diseases.

Two parts are harmful to the environment: (1) the local land is unable to grow plants for decades or hundreds of years, and (2) the soil and river water are highly radioactive.

Air conditioning: long-term exposure to air conditioning is easy to get air conditioning disease; In an air-conditioned environment for a long time, people's adaptability to the environment will deteriorate; Long-term exposure to air conditioning is not good for children's development; As air conditioners dissipate heat into the air, the heat island effect of the city is exacerbated, resulting in heat pollution.

6. With the development of science and technology, the emergence of various means of transportation such as gas cars, trains, and airplanes has made major changes in the daily life of human beings, and human beings are no longer always dependent on their two legs, so the physical quality of human beings is no longer comparable with before.

With the progress of medicine, some "inferior genes" of human beings have been inherited, and the link of survival of the fittest has been missing, which will lead to human degradation.

I think the opposite view is correct, for example, people who rely on scientific and technological achievements without using their hands and brains will become very lazy, isn't this a big disadvantage? Isn't the development of science and technology a kind of damage to the ecological environment? With the development of science and technology, private security is getting lower and lower, some people use network hackers to steal others' privacy, and some people use QQ chat to deceive others' trust and deceive others' emotional ......

Although the development of science and technology has many benefits for people, the disadvantages still outweigh the benefits. After reading the above analysis, do you still think the benefits outweigh the disadvantages?

Give them a set of clothes, and use innovative hands. I would like to ask: Can you guarantee that you are not exposed to technology? Would you rather stay in the primitive antiquity and stay away from the technological present? Can you solve your problems without using technology? Wait.

You can ask the other side who can wear a husk.

On the question of whether the development of science and technology is beneficial or disadvantageous, our friends agree that the advantages of scientific and technological development outweigh the disadvantages.

The way of human existence will not change much compared to 100,000 years ago 200,000 years ago; 3,000 years ago will not change much compared to 2,000 years ago; 600 years ago will not change much compared to 500 years ago. However, people today and the ancients are not what they used to be, and even now they are completely different from 100 years ago. What has driven human history?

What made humanity start a new way of being? I said that this is science and technology, and it is the development of science and technology that has promoted the process of mankind, and it is the development of science and technology that has enabled mankind to have this new and beautiful life. Throughout the ages, which dynasty and generation did not attach importance to the development of science and technology?

Looking back on the past, look at the four major inventions, which are unique; Look at the astronomical calendar and be amazed by it; Zhaozhou arch bridge, exquisite design; A peek at the "Compendium of Materia Medica", Oriental Classics; Zhan pi value, seven decimal places; Overlooking the Silk Road, developing the economy; End blue and white porcelain, famous overseas. The development of science and technology is the road to a strong country, and the development of science and technology is the first driving force for the progress of the Chinese nation. Without technology, where would we have a comfortable material life and spiritual enjoyment?

Without the advancement of science and technology, how can we eat Hybrid No. 2? How can we wear cotton clothes, how can we live in high-rise buildings?

Positive: For a young child, his mother did not give him timely love, which may not only be physically harmful, but also traumatized his soul, and the ignorant he may think that his mother does not care about him and does not love him, which will have a great impact, so I think this mother is really indifferent to the child!

Opposite: The reason why the mother let him stand up on his own is to cultivate the child's courage to face difficulties, and the child can stand up bravely in the face of setbacks and injuries, so as to pave the way for his future growth, so this is true love! She is for the good of the child.

Positive: children always have to learn to grow up on their own, to face difficulties on their own, although the mother loves the child, but understands the importance of self-reliance, only escape the protection of parents, will grow up.

Opposite: The child is still young, and he needs to grow up step by step, not a square that can be exercised for a while; Children need to learn to be independent and strong, and they can't always rely on others to grow up.

Opposition; It also needs the encouragement and encouragement of others to understand how to face it in the future. It's true love. We know that when we get to junior high school and college, we have to be self-reliant, and our parents are not around.

That's why some parents make their children suffer. Everyone knows a story: in college life, several children have been cared for by their parents since they were young, and they are the pearls of their parents' palms.

Therefore, his parents never asked him to do any household chores, but let him concentrate on his studies. As a result, through hard work, he was finally admitted to a good university - Tsinghua University. Many people were happy for him, but he began to worry that he had to live on campus in college life.

So, he had the idea of giving up going to university, but his mother didn't allow it, so she went to the school in person to apply to the principal for a companion, and she was responsible for taking care of his food and drink. But the school didn't allow it, and my mother couldn't do anything about it. After a few days, he finally couldn't take it anymore and decided to go home.

Because he couldn't live at all and couldn't do anything, he dropped out of school. You say that it is because his parents indulged him too much and didn't let him do anything that caused this result. Then the mother is doing the right thing, she doesn't want the child to retreat when he encounters difficulties in the future, and puts all the responsibility on the parents to solve, and doesn't want him to develop the habit of stretching out his hands for clothes and opening his mouth for food.

True love can only cultivate the ability of a child to stand up on his own in the midst of difficulties. But give a certain amount of verbal encouragement that true love is not doting. And the mother of the story has mastered this.

Sometimes harshness is not indifference. When the bird grows up, the old bird throws the bird out of the nest so that the bird can learn to be self-reliant. So it's not about being apathetic, it's about letting the child learn to stand up on his own.

Children who are overly doted will only rely on their parents for everything and everything, and will only cry and shed tears when they encounter any small things. What should be done with these overly spoiled children when their parents are not around? So let the child stand up on his own with a kind of love, not indifference.

Doesn't it say: It is better to give a fish than to give it a fish? Give him a fish today, and he will still starve tomorrow, but if he is taught how to deal with it, tomorrow he will be able to find something to eat.

Children are the meat of parents' hearts, parents can't not love their children, children fall, mothers don't care, may just train him from an early age to be strong, in the child is really hurt, how can parents care about it is true love, so that children can really grow.

Satan Satan stinks on the inside of the fox's stinky feet, and Siemens rushed me after the Spring Festival.

Dear teachers and students:

Hello. The pros and cons of technological development have now become a topic that everyone pays attention to. Before I give my opinion, I would like to make a comparison:

In ancient times, people were superstitious about ghosts and gods, believing that people's lives were determined by heaven, and that birth, old age, sickness and death were controlled by heaven;

In modern times, through the development of science and technology, people have proved that superstitious ideas are not advisable, and they have to create their own lives with their own hands.

In ancient times, many people fell seriously ill, and doctors could do nothing but watch the sick die in agony.

But now, through the development of science and technology, most of the incurable diseases have been successful, and people don't have to worry about getting sick.

In ancient times, communication was very inconvenient, and even when someone in the family died, the wanderer in another country would have to wait for more than a month to know;

But nowadays, communication has become very fast and convenient. Mobile phones, television, newspapers, e-mail, etc., have become a new way to bring people closer together.

These examples are just the tip of the iceberg of how technology has developed for the benefit of humanity. Technology is developing so rapidly that ancient people could not have imagined. Why do TV and newspapers say almost every day that we should advocate the development of science and technology, because how did the thousand-year-old dream of flying come true?

It is the development of science and technology; What is the reason for the ease of communication? It is the development of science and technology; How can a seriously ill person be able to live happily ever after? It is the development of science and technology;

If the development of science and technology is wrong, then why did inventors and scientists such as Galileo, Newton, Edison, Marie Curie, and Einstein dedicate their precious lives to science? Why spend so much precious time on "wrong" causes? Are they incapable of judgment?

Who thinks that their deaths are worthless, and who thinks that there is no point in dedicating their lives to science?

Of course, the development of science and technology has also caused certain negative effects, but these effects should be very small, but human beings are like a magnifying glass, magnifying these negative effects. If humans could consciously reuse plastic bags instead of throwing them away, would it cause such serious white pollution? If human beings can exhaustively exploit resources, will it cause the current shortage of resources?

If humans can save water and factories don't discharge sewage in violation of regulations, will it cause the current severe water shortage? There are many other things like this going on, and some people are not only not introspective, but blindly point the blame to "technology". I feel ridiculous and hopelessly incorrigible for these people.

I can't help but ask: Isn't the development of science and technology necessary for society and mankind?

Well, okay! I'm also a schoolboy, and first of all, you want to emphasize your argument: square. Overwhelm the opposing side in the momentum at the beginning, and give one or two more examples, look for flaws, and kill with one blow.

Oh! By the way, do you know any practical examples? Share it, hee-hee!

Zhengfang: In this information-based world, reading is one of the only ways for us to acquire knowledge. Reading more books can broaden our knowledge, enrich our literary accomplishment, and be of great help to both speaking and writing in the future.

Our knowledge is like a reservoir, a lot of reading allows our reservoir to keep storing a lot of knowledge, and while we replenish our knowledge, the knowledge is constantly leaking out. At this time, if we stop reading, or if we read less, the water in the reservoir will soon dry up. Only by constantly and abundantly reading outside of class can we enrich our knowledge without losing a lot of it.

A lot of knowledge can provide enough material for your essay, otherwise you will only have to write a few wordy sentences that are unquestionable and repetitive.

Against: The ancients said: "Open the book is beneficial." Indeed, being well-read makes a person highly learned, eloquent, and respected.

However, in modern society, we have overturned the ancient saying that "opening the book is beneficial", because we believe that "opening the book is not necessarily beneficial". Of course, the saying that "opening the book is not necessarily beneficial" does not mean that reading more books is not beneficial, but that reading more unhealthy books will have an impact on the body and mind, and there is no benefit. When you read more unhealthy books, your poisoning will get deeper and deeper, and you will fall into the abyss, never having a chance to turn over, what a tragic fate it must be!

A person's bright future lies in the kind of books he chooses, and if he chooses books that are beneficial, then his future will be bright; If he chooses those books that are not known to the party, then his future will be dark, but if he can stop from the precipice and change his ways, I believe he can also have a bright future. Therefore, it is not entirely correct to say that "opening the book is not necessarily beneficial".

It is good to read a lot of books, but you must read books that are beneficial and not detrimental to your physical and mental health.

Me: Whether open books are beneficial or not, it is limited with the development of the times. It has a premise, depending on whether the books you are reading are healthy and how much you can accept them?

Anything can change under certain circumstances. This is the development of historical materialism and dialecticism. The windows opened, and fresh air came in, but flies and everything else would come in.

So how about adding a screen? Fresh air came in, but flies and mosquitoes didn't.