Grade 6 Chinese Unit 5 Debate Competition

In Chinese culture, "faith" and "righteousness" constitute "faithfulness", which is a kind of humanistic spirit and the criterion of life. White lies are also a type of lies, just like benign malignant tumors in human diseases, no matter how different the results of the disease are, it is a disease and harmful to human health. The same is true of white lies, in the final analysis, white lies are not seeking truth from facts, telling lies and falsehoods, exaggerating, covering up, and distorting the truth.

On the contrary,"Integrity"It is a very important norm, and integrity is to seek"Really"is the pursuit of justice. The ancients said"The real one", sincerely. If you are not sincere, you can't move people.

"Lies" are called "lies" because they are false, untrue, and deceitful words. If a person often has lies in his mouth to deceive others, over time, he will lose people's trust.

The origin of the benefit of opening the book is that Song Taizu said:"As long as it's reading, there's always something good".Since then, it has become an idiom that the opening of the book is beneficial.

You may be wondering, why do you talk about this? It's simple, it's key"Total"Word. This is saying that there will always be good, not only good.

Therefore, to say that the book is beneficial, it needs to be argued that reading is beneficial rather than harmful. (Don't get caught up in the opposite side.) Otherwise, you will definitely lose.

The reason will be understood after reading the following)

As far as the benefits of reading are concerned, the power is so great that it makes people realize their mistakes, change their past mistakes, go to the bright road, and achieve success; Xiao can learn a few writing methods, a few words, and even recognize a few words. These are the benefits of reading, and there is no denying it. Therefore, a few points can be made to argue that bad books also have some benefits:

First, as long as it is called a bad book, it will certainly affect people's character and lead them to the wrong path. But think about it, if those bad books can't resonate with readers and make people go deep into them, then what will happen like this? If the structure and layout of the book, the way of expression, the idea and description, the language and the wording, etc., are mediocre, or even average"Journal"It's not as good as a similar composition, so how can it resonate with readers? Therefore, no matter how bad it is, at least some writing methods can be learned in the so-called bad books, and no matter how bad it is, you can learn a few words. Can this be said to be unhelpful?

Second, whether it is a bad book or a good book, it is judged by whether the good of the book outweighs the harm or the harm outweighs the good. In other words, bad books are also beneficial.

Third, Lao Tzu in ancient China had a point of view: everything has its own two sides, and since bad books are harmful, then they must have their benefits.

But have you ever thought that even if such a book exists, can anyone read it? Will you go to see it? Since I won't go to see it, then even"Uncoiled"With this premise gone, how to talk about whether opening the book is beneficial or harmful?

Fifth, although you can cite a bunch of examples of depravity, madness, and breaking the law because of reading. So what does this mean? It can only show that the person who reads the book himself is not in the right state of mind.

That's a matter of mentality, and can't be blamed on books. Can someone take a knife to cut and kill someone, can they blame the knife for being bad?

Therefore, as long as you read, it will be beneficial, whether it is big or small. So it can be pushed"Uncoiling is beneficial"It must be true.

As for"Unbook is not necessarily beneficial", is a neutral word, half of it is (beneficial) is true, but the other half - unhelpful - unhelpful is problematic: unhelpful, not harmful. Just like a car driving on the road, it doesn't fly into the blue sky like an airplane, can it be said that it is burrowing into the ground?

Suppose the argument is"Open book is harmful", then according to some of the arguments just now, it is natural that it can also be established, but to say"Unhelpful"That's wrong. So, on this issue, the argument of the opposing side is only half right. (And this half is still a positive argument)

Students, I think people should be honest and not lie. I think a lie is a lie, it is a bad phenomenon, and a lie can sometimes harm others, so people should not panic. Wen Jie wrote.

A white lie is motivated by good intentions, with the purpose and starting point of defending the interests of others. As we all know, contradictions are divided into universality and particularity, and particularity is contained in and special and is distinguished from universality. According to the nature of its white lie, it is not a bad benefit, but is based on the sincerity and goodness of the heart, while a malicious lie is an act of seeking benefits for the liar, using others as a means with a strong desire for profit and weak reason, and not hesitating to harm others.

The lies that a person who is good in itself is "forced" to tell in a certain state are benevolent, and this lie is a kind of kindness, a kind of concern for the subject. And people with bad intentions, no matter how disguised, how flattering, and how they rack their brains to put a white hat on their malicious lies, the lies they tell are all malicious and purposeful. Obviously, a white lie does not hinder integrity.

Positive: The pros outweigh the cons.

1.From the point of view of medicine: the emergence of various modern technologies, laser surgery, etc., has saved many lives.

2.From the astronomical aspect: artificial earth satellites, the invention of spacecraft, such as meteorological satellites, can accurately ** a section of the future.

The weather changes in time provide convenience for human production and life.

3.Human beings learned to use fire to cook food from the primitive life of drinking blood, from relying on nature to breeding and breeding, from being defenseless.

to metallurgical smelting.

4.In ancient times, many people became seriously ill, and doctors could do nothing but watch the sick die in agony. Presentable.

In addition, through the development of science and technology, most of the incurable diseases have been successful**, and people do not have to worry about getting sick.

5.In ancient times, communication was very inconvenient, and even when someone in the family died, the wanderer in another country would have to wait for more than a month to know;

But nowadays, communication has become very fast and convenient. Mobile phones, televisions, newspapers, e-mails, etc., are now available.

It is a new way to bring people closer together.

6.If you say that the development of science and technology will do more harm than good, then how can China's thousand-year-old dream of flying come true without the development of science and technology? Communication.

The convenience is what causes it.

How can a seriously ill person live a happy life again? It is the development of science and technology! As.

If it is wrong to say that the development of science and technology is wrong, then Galileo

Newton, Edison,

Marie Curie, Albert Einstein and other inventors

Scientists, why should you dedicate your precious life to science? Why spend so much precious time on "mistakes."

Career? Are they incapable of judgment? Who thinks their deaths are worthless, and who thinks.

They dedicate themselves to science, it doesn't make sense at all.

7.If you say that technological development will do more harm than good, you can do it without using any means of transportation for a week, without being neutral.

pens, ballpoint pens,

Pen? You can go a week without watching TV

Don't listen to the radio, don't read the newspaper, don't read books, don't surf the Internet?

Can you go a week without eating the R&D hybrid rice? Don't eat pasta? Don't drink drinks?

No. Because technology has.

It is closely related to you and has been inseparable from you!

8.It is precisely because of the development of science and technology.

before the rocket was launched.

It has fulfilled the Chinese people's dream of flying in the century.

With the development of science and technology, the Bird's Nest Water Cube was built.

China's Olympic dream has been realized.

How can developed Chinese without science and technology realize their dreams?

This? Only with the continuous development of science and technology, our life will be better!

Technological development: the pros or cons.

XM Xiaoman writes so well! Why don't you adopt him?!

Although it is not good to deceive, we need to know that white lies are good.