What is the connection between the heart of shame mentioned by Mencius and the sacrificing of one s

Mencius: "Everyone has compassion; Everyone has a heart of shame; Respectful heart is shared by everyone; Everyone has the heart of right and wrong. compassion, benevolence; The heart of shame is also righteousness; Respectful heart, courtesy; The heart of right and wrong, wisdom also.

Benevolence, righteousness, propriety, and wisdom are not imposed on me from the outside, but also by me. ”

The heart of shame and righteousness is also because of the heart of shame, everyone has it, so people sacrifice their lives for righteousness.

"You can't have it both ways. The literal meaning of this sentence is nothing more than to say: fish and bear's paw, you can only choose one of these two things.

But is that really all there is to it? If I write an article just to talk about fish and bear's paws, it basically means nothing, so this is a sentence with deep meaning.

This time, I am talking about the topic of sacrificing life for righteousness, that is, you have given up your life and chosen love. But why should I use fish and bear's paws to compare this topic? In fact, this sentence appears in many places in our lives, and everyone will face a choice, and at the same time, they will think about which is more important and which is more needed.

Fish and bear's paws are no exception, so when it comes to the end, which is more valuable?

This is not a profound question. In terms of **, bear paws are more valuable than fish. Combined with the idea of sacrificing one's life for righteousness, let's think about it:

Since many people sacrifice their lives for righteousness, it shows that in a sense, love is more important than life. Through the conclusion that "bear's paws are more valuable than fish", we can know that love is more important than life, and bear's paws are more important than fish. Then the "bear's paw" here is likely to represent righteousness, and as for life, it should be a fish.

Mencius's proposition is to sacrifice his life for righteousness, he would rather have no life, but also to adhere to righteousness, which I admire him very much, righteousness is not very easy to adhere to, and between life and righteousness, it is not easy to achieve righteousness. I admire Mencius's proposition very much. He has far-reaching benevolence and righteousness in his heart, and it seems that he is not very brave, but in fact he has the spirit of righteousness in his heart.

In fact, Mencius attaches great importance to affection, which does not necessarily mean that he does not attach importance to life, in fact, he also especially hopes to live, after all, the safety of life is greater than heaven. He wanted to have both, but he would compare the two, and the contrast would come out: Mencius felt that friendship was relatively important, and life was not more important than that.

Of course, he also wanted to live, but he felt that he couldn't survive. He took this very seriously. It is almost meaningless for a person to live in secret.

At the same time, no matter how much Mencius attaches importance to righteousness, he is also a person, he is also afraid of death, the end of everyone's life journey is what they will face, no one can live in the world all the time, after the Tao gives birth to all things, all things still have to return to the Tao, and this is originally a natural law. Mencius already saw it as a very common thing, because everyone faces death, so he has looked down on life and death. This is a very common thing, and no one is immune to disaster and death.

In fact, I think Mencius is really a person with the spirit of righteousness, and his allusion also reminds us of two kinds of people: one people value their own lives, and the other people value righteousness. Mencius is willing to give up his life to teach righteousness, this spirit is really admirable, this is something that many people can't do, you can sacrifice yourself for righteousness, that's why I say that this allusion contains deep meaning, it's really classic.

For the individual today, the meaning of sacrificing one's life for righteousness is to seek peace of mind. For society, the purpose of sacrificing one's life for righteousness is to suppress evil and promote good, and the result of suppressing evil and promoting good is that society is more stable and harmonious.

In today's peaceful environment, although we do not sacrifice our lives, "sacrificing our lives for righteousness" is not leaving us. "Sacrificing one's life" is not limited to sacrificing one's life, but also includes personal interests that are as important as one's life. Life is certainly very important to the individual, but it is even more uncomfortable to live in the world in violation of the principles of being a human being than to die.

Mencius's idea of "sacrificing one's life for righteousness" had a positive impact on later generations

Mencius pointed out that life is indeed precious, but people must not do things that disregard courtesy, righteousness and shame for the sake of life. If everyone chooses to sacrifice righteousness for the sake of preserving their lives, then in the end everyone will become a person who steals their lives.

In this way, when there is a disaster, a war, or an enemy invasion, everyone will only choose to escape. In the end, everyone is too busy to take care of themselves, and in the end, everyone is unable to protect themselves and loses their lives. Therefore, only by hiding the righteousness in our hearts and holding it in our hands can we live with dignity and the value of life.

Mencius's idea of sacrificing one's life for righteousness has had a positive impact on later generations, not only influencing people at all levels of society, allowing them to build a strong psychological defense line, maintaining the dignity of human beings, but also inspiring people from different walks of life to be able to hold high the banner of righteousness, be born and die, go to the soup and fire, eliminate violence and peace, and be fearless and fearless.

It is precisely under the guidance of this kind of thinking that the whole society is full of righteousness, and there are strong and beautiful elements in human nature.

Sacrificing one's life for a just cause means sacrificing one's life for a just cause.

Life is what I want, and righteousness is what I want. You can't have both, and those who sacrifice their lives to take righteousness are also. ”

2. Sacrificing one's life for righteousness refers to sacrificing one's life for a just cause. The "life" in "sacrificing one's life for righteousness" refers to life, not the body, and "sacrificing one's life for righteousness" should not be misremembered as "sacrificing one's life for righteousness".

1. Figurative argument: At the beginning of this article, a metaphorical argument is used, comparing the choice of life and death to the choice of fish and bear's paws.

2. Example argument: The author takes "a spoon of food, a bean soup" as an example, which seems to be a trivial "a spoon of food, a bean soup", when it is related to life and death, it can also test a person's morality. "Huer" and "Keer" are disdainful of "doers" and "beggars", which is a manifestation of people not losing their "trembling hearts".

3. Comparative argument: The third paragraph uses a comparative argument to compare the current situation with the previous situation. Citing the example of some people who "do not defend propriety and righteousness" and covet "ten thousand bells" to illustrate the manifestation of the loss of "original heart".

One piece of food, one bean soup" is much less than "ten thousand bells", but "Fude is dead", it seems to be more important.

Compare "a spoonful of food, a bean soup" with "ten thousand bells". In terms of the amount of wealth, "10,000 bells" are naturally many. However, "Wan Zhong" determines "the beauty of the palace, the devotion of wives and concubines, and the poor who know me to get me", while "a spoon of food, a bean soup" determines life, which is naturally more important than "Wan Zhong".

Through this comparison, people not only realize how unworthy it is to leave "etiquette and righteousness" behind and covet wealth and wealth, but also make people realize that the loss of "original heart" is a gradual process, and people should always reflect on themselves.

Mencius believed that those who can sacrifice their lives for righteousness are: those who want more than the living, and those who do evil more than the dead. Mencius (c. 372 BC-289 BC), name Ke, unknown characters (Ziyu, Ziju and other character lists are all from forgery books, or made up by later generations), in the middle of the Warring States period, the Zou people of the Lu State (now the southeast of Zou City, Shandong), not far from Confucius's hometown of Qufu.

Mencius was a famous thinker, politician, educator, inheritor of Confucius, and an important representative of Confucianism.

Mencius of the Warring States period believed that the person who could sacrifice his life for righteousness was: a sage, a sage.

In "Fish I Want" in "Mencius Gaozi I", Mencius discusses the reason why sages are admired by people:

If a man is made to do more than to live, then why should he not use him who can live? If there is no worse than the dead, then why not avoid the sick? From the yes, there is no need, and from the yes, you can avoid trouble and do nothing.

Therefore they desire more than the living, and evil more than the dead. Not only the sage has a heart, everyone has it, and the sage can not lose his ears.

Interpretation: If there is nothing more important than life that people want, then what means are not available to all the means that can preserve life? If there is no more thing that people hate than death, then what bad thing can be used to escape calamity?

You can survive by a certain means, but some people refuse to use it; There is a way to avoid disaster, but some people are not willing to use it.

It follows that they love something more precious than life (that is, "righteousness"); There is something worse than death that they hate (that is, "unrighteousness"). Not only sages have this kind of thinking, but everyone has it, but sages can not lose it.

This passage shows that Mencius believed that the reason why sages are admired is because sages put morality and justice in the highest position, even more important than life.

Yue Fei Jing Zhong Serving the Country Jing Ke Jing Ke Thorn Qin Su Wu Su Wu Shepherd (These operations are enough!) ~）

If you fill in a sentence: what you want is more than the living, and what you do evil is more than the dead.

Compassion, shame, humility, discernment.