If you want to enter the DSLR, Nikon D7000 18 105 and Bin K5 18 135 two machine entanglement, please

Of courseD7000,The lens group of the SLR is very important,There are still a few cost-effective lenses in the mud pit,Pentax body is acceptable,But the lens can be burned again。。。

The fuselage has K5 is higher than D7000, but the SLR is still a lens in the end, so choose D7000! Nikon lenses still have a lot more options than Pentax!

I think it's better to still have a Nikon D7000, and I use the D70S now, and I just want to change to the D7000.

The advantage of the D7000 is that the Nikon lens group can be upgraded to a full set in the future; If you plan to invest a large amount in the later stage, you can choose;

The quality of the body and lens itself of the K5 set of machines is higher than that of the D7000 set of machines, sturdy and durable, but also waterproof and dustproof, and the shooting effect is good.

Nikon D7000 18-105 This has many advantages over the latter, the most important one is that Nikon's lens group is much richer than Pentax, there are more options, and you can add another convenient portrait. These 2 shots are enough for you to play for a long time.

Decisive K5 is smaller than D7000 Picture quality is better Fuselage three defense Foreign evaluations**Evaluation K5 scores are higher than D7000 And if you buy parallel goods** also has an advantage.

If you don't plan to upgrade full-frame in the future, make a decision K5

It is not easy to compare the horizontal between SLR camera brands, in addition to the similar classification of Canon Nikon, there are also corresponding models at all levels, Pentax is worse, not Pentax says that its model is a high-end model, it is high-end.

SLR technology is updated rapidly, and the individual data of mid-to-high-end models a few years ago may not be as good as the newly launched entry-level models.

If you classify it simply, the APSC format SLR, the entry-level model does not have a shoulder screen, a plastic body, and a smaller body. There is a shoulder screen in the middle end, a metal body, and a large body. High-end SLR generally refers to full-frame cameras, with a body of more than 14,000 yuan, a wide body, fine workmanship, a shoulder screen, and good waterproof and dustproof performance.

The D7000 and K5 are the same level of machines, both of which belong to the mid-range flagship models.

However, Pentax only has the K5, an APS-C format flagship, while Nikon has D300s in addition to D7000, and Nikon uses D300S as the APS-C flagship.

In the same APS-C format machine, there is a good difference between the entry-level machine and the mid-range machine, and you can basically judge it by looking directly at whether there is a shoulder screen or not. The mid-range and high-end are not good to distinguish, you need to look at the product structure of each company, if Nikon does not have D300S, D7000 is his APS-C flagship. Whether it is high-end or not is not necessarily the final say in parameters.

Just like the 550D of the entry-level machine, the pixels are higher than those of K5 and D7000.

The K5 is Pentax's highest-end model in the 135 format range. The D7000 also has the D700 D3 which NB sparkling full-frame.

The K5 body is metal, and the D7000 is plastic (there is metal, but the key structural part connected to the lens mount.

The difference between entry and mid-range is that the viewfinder is a pentaprism or a penta-sided mirror, with or without a shoulder screen, and the difference between the mid-range and high-end is the body material, three-proof performance...

APSC SLR is divided into, amateur entry, 550D, 600D, D3100, and KR are all in this category.

Mid-range: 60D, D7000, K5, K7 are all in this column.

Professional high-end: 7D, D300S

It's not just by the speed of continuous shooting. Mainly rely on the shoulder screen, maneuverability, body material, and so on.

But as a user. Don't be so tangled. Because in addition to full-frame, the difference between SLRs is getting smaller and smaller. The imaging elements are essentially the same.

The differences between Nikon 18-55 and 18-105 lenses are as follows: different lens structures, different focal length ranges, and different angle of view ranges.

First, the lens structure is different.

1. Nikon 18-55 lens: The lens structure of Nikon 18-55 lens is 11 elements in 8 groups, including 1 aspherical lens.

2. Nikon 18-105 lens: The lens structure of Nikon 18-105 lens is 15 elements in 11 groups, including 1 LED glass lens and 1 aspherical lens.

Second, the focal length range is different.

1. Nikon 18-55 lens: The minimum focusing distance of Nikon 18-55 lens is 18-55mm.

2. Nikon 18-105 lens: The minimum focusing distance of Nikon 18-105 lens is, and the focal length range is.

3. The range of viewing angles is different.

1. Nikon 18-55 lens: The angle of view of Nikon 18-55 lens is 76 degrees to 28 degrees 50 minutes.

2. Nikon 18-105 lens: The angle of view of Nikon 18-105 lens is 76 degrees to 15 degrees 20 minutes.

The AF-S DX 18-105mm F ed VR lens has a focal length that is sufficient for portraits or landscapes for everyday use, and the sharpness is high, the image quality and workmanship are more generous, and it is the most cost-effective Nikon DX format lens. The disadvantage is that the distortion at the wide-angle end is poorly controlled, and there is a slight vignetting at the telephoto end; The AF-S DX 18-55mm F VR image quality, especially the distortion control, is better than that of the 18-105, but the disadvantage is that the 18mm wide-angle end is slightly more distorted, and the 55mm mid-focus image quality is quite good.

Generally, if you are just starting out, if you have a sufficient budget, I recommend replacing the set lens with this lens, not only for the price difference of only 1,000 yuan with the set lens, but for the cost performance. The 18-55 lens is generally used for two or three months, and users will feel that the focal length of the lens is not enough, while the 18-105 lens will basically always be used as the camera hook-up head as long as it does not have too high requirements for imaging quality.

Since you can come up and ask this question, it means that you don't know much about these things, then decisively 5100 plus 18-105Don't think about anything else, because even if you are given a good lens and a good camera now, the things you shoot should be about the same, and the 18-105 lens can be adapted to most shooting occasions, you take family photos at home, take group photos, come out to play and take pictures, take commemorative photos, or occasionally gather or something, it is completely enough, and the focal length of 18 55 is definitely a little insufficient.

In terms of picture quality, there is not much difference between the two heads, at least there is no difference with the naked eye. If it's a travel machine, you don't want to change the lens all the time, or 18-105, you can use it for a long time, and when you feel that the lens is not good, you have almost changed the whole set.

You get what you pay for,If you have the conditions, it is recommended that D5100+18-105,D3100It's a little early,D5100The sensor image quality is very good,In addition, the fuselage level5100 is also higher than 3100,The operation is still good,And 5100 has a flip screen。

18-55 and 18-105 image quality will not be too good, but 18-105 focal length is much more convenient, workmanship is slightly better, if you only buy a head, it is still more recommended 18-105, of course, you can also 18-55 with others, such as 50, but just for home use, the average person is too lazy to toss, it depends on their own situation.

Extended Content:As an upgraded version of the D60, the Nikon D3000 has a lot of changes in shape and function, although it still uses the DX format on the D60, the 10 million pixel CCD, and the Nikon Exploded image processor, but compared with the previous Nikon entry camera, the biggest improvement of the D3000 is the use of a higher-level 11-point Muti-Cam 1000 focusing system. This means that in terms of focusing performance, the D3000 has a similar level to the mid-to-high-end cameras such as the D200 and D90.

It's all 18 starts, 105 has a large zoom range, the scenery can be, and the quality of the general 18-55 is average, you can keep one of them.

The difference is in the different zoom magnifications, 18-55 magnification is a little more than 3x, 18-105 is a little less than 6x.

The general scenery can be these 2, and it is better to have a vision of 105.

The numbers are different, such a simple thing.

Cost-effective compact: K5

Aftermarket and elevate the entire **:d 7000

The K5 and D7000 use CMOS, but Pennie Nikon excels in a piece of CMOS adjustment for the DXO ranking ratio, and the K5 has been the king of APS-C (becoming the K5II), the same

Since you plan to have a few more heads in the future, then Pentax is not very suitable......Because its lens group is really not rich enough.

Choose Nikon Bar ......But don't choose the D7000This camera is long outdated. At present, it is more appropriate to choose the D7100, D7200 or even the D7500. Among them, the D7500 has the highest performance, and the D7100 has the highest cost performance.

Pentax's K3, which can be compared with D7100, is at least a first-generation entry machine, and its technical parameters are comparable to D5200.

It is recommended that you start with first-line brands such as Canon and Nikon.

The reason is: once you get started, it determines your future path, and you will pay too much for changing doors later. Including your previous understanding of the equipment, habits, aesthetics, lens group ......Wait, once the door is changed, everything starts from scratch.

The landlord said**,That is, K5 plus a waterproof small set.,I'm just playing the little five.,It's really good.,Not later! It's still good to have a punch!

I don't plan to upgrade the full width.,You have to use Pentax.,Sooner or later, the full width will be upgraded.,Choose K5 bar will definitely make you break the idea of full width.。

Canon EOS 60D+18-135

As a Canon double-digit model with the same period.

Compared with the one- and three-digit models, the positioning is still clear. The performance has the name of the minus double-digit body. Canon double-digit models have always been a poor value for money.

Advantage 1, the rotatable screen is the biggest advantage of this machine.

2. Compared with the three-digit model 600D in the same period, it has great advantages in focusing system, viewfinder, body size, level, continuous shooting speed, battery life, etc. In line with product positioning.

3. The wireless flash function is practical, and it has finally caught up with Nikon's pace in this regard.

4. Adopt plastic body, reduce weight. This is a significant improvement over the previous generation of double-digit models.

5. The lockable ** mode disk improves the misoperation.

My opinion is the new body used lenses

What are you going to do with your camera? What is the usual subject?

The above is much the same, first of all, the above listed are all pullovers, and the relationship between the image quality and details of ** is very large.

It's best to have a single camera + lens, and the set is recommended K5+18-55, this lens is good.

d90+18-105 Canon 60d+18-135 can be taken on flickr to see what netizens shot**.

canon 60d

nikon d90

Pentax K5....Better than your D7000 and D90. And it's cost-effective!

Recommend Pentax K52S (commonly known as two fools).

1. Both Nikon and Pentax use sensors developed by Sony. Judging from the evaluation results of the international famous camera evaluation agency DXO Lab in France, the dynamic range, color depth, and high sensitivity scores of the two fools are better than those of the D7000. In other words, the picture quality of the second fool is better than that of 7000;

2. Pentax's color is very beautiful, and it is very good to go straight, which everyone knows, Pentax green is very famous, and Nikon's color needs to be adjusted later, and there is a tendency to yellowish if it goes straight out, commonly known as Nikon yellow. Pentax's image synthesis chip has a better grasp of color;

3. Since the landlord does not play with the lens, the shortcomings of the insufficient support of the Pentax lens group will not become a disadvantage, and Nikon's golden circle lens and strong lens group support will not become an advantage. If you play with dog heads, Pentax's dog heads are good. The mantra says, Pentax dog head is not a dog, and the cow head is not a cow.

But Pentax's Three Princesses is well shot;

4. The fuselage configuration of the second fool is better than that of D7000 (only one is not as good as D7000, that is, the low-light focus is not as resolute as Nikon, and there is hesitation), and it is small, and the quality and control are almost the same.

Hope it helps the landlord.

Nikon's follow-up is strong, especially the tens of thousands of yuan gold circle 14-24, 85g, 35g are all greedy things, but the half-width machine is difficult to play, so burning the whole frame in the future is also burning money, if you don't play to that step, Nikon's half-frame lens is just like that.

Pentax only does half a frame, and there are many good shots, stars 55, 165, 535, 625, a few FA, all of which are good shots, the scenery is quite okay, and the biscuit wide angle should be more suitable for you.

These 2 are good machines, if you don't play full-width, it doesn't matter if you want to buy Pentax in the future.

Pentax 18-135wr more than 3,000 oceans are actually still a dog's head,For that quality--- it's too expensive, it's really not recommended to enter,500+ dal18-55 with da 21 biscuits are far better than that,Of course, there are conditions165 zoom star emperor direct 6K ocean is the best,This thing is really worth that price。