Philosophy: Can anyone help me? Please come in and help me, a student of philosophy

No matter what major you choose, you will have a good job if you study philosophy seriously.

You have to know what you want.

Is it a good job? What makes a good job for you?

Happy? Or the salary is more.

Are you happy with a higher salary?

To study a major, I suggest that you choose the one you like, the one with high technical level, and the one that is difficult.

The theory of evolution is natural selection, where the fittest survive and the unfit are eliminated.

Humanity as a species has adapted to the natural environment and survived, and morality can also be seen as a product of evolution. Suppose there are two kinds of human beings, one with morality and one without morality, the moral ones will help the weak, and the non-moral ones will kill each other, and the result should be that the moral humans will survive and the immoral humans will be eliminated.

In a moral human society, there will be people with different ideas and different ways of behaving, but human beings as a whole will not only have some people adapt to the environment, so this issue is not suitable to be explained by evolutionary theory.

Morality is a kind of self-discipline, for your problem, the first type of people are not without moral bottom line, because they will not do evil casually, they are not unscrupulous, but "good" at choosing means. Those who are truly immoral, such as criminals who do evil willingly, they certainly cannot be considered successful.

If you think that the first type of person can succeed, then the second type of person does not fail either. The first type of people get the money they want, the second type of people also get what they want, such as a sense of morality, the first type of people will not grow more and more, and the second type of people will not die. Your question itself is misplaced.

A good material life is not the only criterion for success, nor is it the goal that everyone pursues.

Read this book, Nietzsche's "On the Universal System of Morality".

None of that seems right.

1 Justice's epistemology is agnostic, holding that the world can be known.

2 "Insisting on the primacy of matter" is a characteristic of materialist philosophy, and it is not only a matter of Ma Roll.

3 "The world is made up of a certain species or a few specific primordial substances" is ancient naïve materialism, and if the atom is the composition of the world, it is modern metaphysics.

The above is based on the knowledge I learned in high school philosophy.

The philosophy you mention here should refer to philosophy as an independent discipline, not philosophy in the sense of something like philosophy of life.

I think: we need philosophy.

I think you should have a rough idea in your own mind. Do we need philosophy? It's a profound question that you can keep pursuing. Isn't that the philosophical way of thinking?

A madman is not the same as a philosopher, who is only observed by others.

Philosophy is a banner in times of turmoil, destroying everything and overthrowing everything.

Philosophy is an ideological tool in times of peace, helping to consolidate gains.

Need! Because most of the reason why this is the case today is because it is philosophy, which guides everything in our lives and is the root of all laws. To understand the world, this course is really needed. Much of the reason why Germany is a cultural powerhouse is because of philosophy.