Idealistic scientists, what kind of scientists are materialistic?

Encyclopedia "tag: scientists", there are many names of scientists. Among them, there are many idealistic scientists.

The best answer to this question lies in the theory of practice and contradiction in the first volume of Mao Xuan. The article explains that materialist dialectics is of a class character and is exclusively for the proletariat. Of course, the petty bourgeoisie in modern society is increasing day by day, and it begins to doubt whether materialist dialectics can be used by other classes other than the proletariat, so some people think that since the class nature of materialist dialectics is to serve the proletariat, can the opposing idealism correspond to the theory of service to the bourgeoisie?

So a lot of people are starting to skew their views in favor of this answer.

But in the theory of contradiction, there is a decisive problem, two worldviews. Idealistic materialism is actually the main form of the two world views, and today's materialism is no longer an idea exclusively for a specific class. Rather, it is another perspective and perspective that can be used for human exploration of the future exploration of science.

The basic manifestation is that the idealistic world view is based on the subjective will of people, while the materialist world view is the result of practice and the observation of the development of things is the starting point. Therefore, scientists are also divided into two types: materialism and idealism. For the exploration of nature, the study of natural science is usually materialist, I think that Newton, Einstein and other scientists were materialists when they were young, but after old age, due to the limitations of human exploration ability, they speculated too much, so they became idealists, relativity is actually idealism, including Hawking, etc., their characteristics are usually based on their own cognitive experience as a standard and then guess larger space things.

Start your research with this definition. Just like scientists say that the sun is a sphere, but so far there is no evidence to prove that the sun is a sphere, because the inside of the sun cannot be detected at all, maybe the inside of the sun is a high-speed rotating black hole vortex is not known, after all, the distance between the nine planets and the sun belongs to the outer circle of the sun. So it's a question of whether you define first or later.

Idealistic materialism is like that. Therefore, as pragmatics, of course, we must choose materialism.

Materialism and idealism are both basic schools of philosophy, and both of them have a certain historical origin and social foundation, and both represent the worldview of a certain class and social stratum and serve it.

Materialism is an ideological system opposed to idealism, and generally speaking, it is the world outlook of the advanced classes, reflecting the interests of the advanced classes suitable for the development of productive forces and science.

Materialist philosophy is often envied by the advanced forces, progressive brothers, and classes in society to oppose reactionary forces and religious superstitions, maintain the development of science, and promote the progress of society.

Significance

Historical materialism provides people with an ideological line for correctly understanding social phenomena and the laws of social and historical development, and it reveals that the movement of basic social contradictions is the fundamental driving force for social development, and this viewpoint provides a scientific basis for understanding the laws of the development of human society and demonstrating the emergence, development, and demise of capitalist society, thus correcting the defects of utopian socialists who only start from abstract rational principles to condemn the capitalist system.

It reveals that the class struggle is the direct driving force for the development of class society, and corrects the illusion that the righteous of utopian society hope that the rulers will be kind and realize the blueprint of social change in a peaceful way.

It reveals that the masses of the people are the creators of history, and overcomes the limitation of utopian socialists who regard the proletariat as a mere suffering class and pin their hopes for historical progress and social replacement on a few geniuses.

Materialist philosophers are very few individuals in history. For example, Feuerbach, Marx, etc.

Idealism is the mainstream of Western philosophy. For example, Plato and Hegel were objective idealists, and Berkeley and Fichte were subjective idealism.

Science is materialistic.

Materialism: The essence of the world is matter, there is matter first and then consciousness in the world, and matter determines consciousness.

Consciousness is a reflection of matter (Matter First, Consciousness Second.

The relationship between matter and consciousness is the basic question of philosophy; Proceeding from reality is the fundamental foothold for people to correctly understand the world and effectively transform the world. As far as China is concerned, it is necessary to proceed from reality and build socialism with Chinese characteristics.

If you want to talk about science, it is materialism, and to say which one is more worth learning, it depends on your own ideas and opinions, because idealism believes that "all laws return to the heart", and science cannot explain everything. Materialism, on the other hand, believes that everything has laws and laws to follow, and that anything in the universe can be proved by mathematical formulas.

LZ said: "Matter determines consciousness, consciousness reacts with matter, where is idealism unscientific? ”

Idealism is not scientific, because science is rigorous, please ask what consciousness is, now scientists can't explain clearly, since you don't know what consciousness is, why do you say that it reacts with matter? How does it react to matter? Is it itself a substance?

Since you don't know, you can only explore, this is science.

With every step forward in science, metaphysics takes a step back. ”

But believing in materialism and idealism will meet sooner or later.

Can matter make the heavens and the earth run in an orderly manner? If there is no orderly operation of heaven and earth, where can matter come from? Can you recognize that the soil is yellow?

This is absolutely impossible to be established, so only by creating consciousness can we create matter and make matter run in an orderly manner, and we can understand physics, chemistry, mathematics, literature, and so on. Therefore, to understand the world, we must put consciousness first, and matter second. Materialism is putting the cart before the horse, which is no way to do it, because he was born without a father, so he recognizes the thief as his father.

The ancient Chinese have long understood that consciousness is the first and material is secondary, and the problems reflected in the entire Yixue are mainly based on their sects, and "all changes do not deviate from their sects". The sect is consciousness, and with its sect, it is a change in joining the army, so there are cold and summer exchanges, thunder and wind. For example, if you prescribe a traditional Chinese medicine prescription, add tangerine peel for flatulence, and add Zhu Lingze for edema.

In the eyes of Western medicine, Chinese medicine prescriptions are disorganized, "a pile of grass and wood dregs stewed". As everyone knows, its purpose is based on the Book of Changes, which is aimed at animals with internal organs, rather than prescribing Chinese medicine for a snake or a caterpillar, which is the science of consciousness.

Then there is the cultivation of immortals and the cultivation of the Buddha's body, talking about immortality and returning to the roots, this sect is consciousness, the Tao Buddha is different but its meaning is the same, all of them are based on the will of the sect, around all aspects of the sect, human ethics and morality, longevity and poverty are related, so as to form ancient Chinese philosophical thoughts.

Modern science has come to an end, or rather a dead end. Mobile phones, computers, and automobiles have become consumer goods for the public, and it seems that the quality of life has improved, and everything to eat and play is also full of tricks. However, many wealthy people have no appetite in the face of the delicacies of the mountains and seas, sleep on Simmons and are emotionally disturbed and difficult to sleep, and their mental appearance and health index are declining.

As everyone knows, the people have inadvertently violated the objective law, the more electrical appliances, the more serious the electromagnetic pollution, disrupting the inherent aura of life, the electric field magnetic field, the electric field magnetic field is infinitely expanded, and the inherent aura of life is lost.

Some scientists have seen the drawbacks of scientific development, such as the American Nobel laureate who has spoken in public many times, saying that materialism is no longer suitable for practical problems, and we should change the direction of research and use the science of consciousness to open a crack in the universe.

If we don't re-understand consciousness, or materialism, it will limit us to the rules and regulations, no matter how big the gold and silver mountains are, our spiritual realm and health index are hovering at a low level, and we will not live better than birds, and we will not be happier and happier than mountain boars—do you have birds that soar to their heart's content? Do you have a boar to eat? Slowly it will make people feel that life tastes like chewing wax, everything is superfluous, and it is impossible to just seek health and happiness.

If our consciousness is strong enough to give full play to our sixth sense, seventh, eighth, ninth, and tenth senses, are we still scientists like this? Will it still be said that Einstein is the greatest? We have long since risen to a high level, which is enough to expand our health index and happiness index, and it is difficult to express what kind of happy and happy mood we have.

You say that there is matter first, and then there is consciousness, but the discovery of atoms is first conscious, and then observed, consciousness comes first.

Without spiritual consciousness, humans will never see atoms and will never know bosons.

Of course, trees, houses, roads, cars, ,,, can be seen directly, and no mental will is required.

If we talk about materialism and idealism, we are fighting over who is right with materialism or idealism?

Once, the geocentric theory was considered correct, and later the heliocentric theory was considered correct, and then there was a big ** theory of the universe. The so-called correctness is only correct in the pattern of cognition. When an individual or some people step out of the ordinary perception and express a deviant viewpoint, whether it is correct or not, it is easy to judge it as incorrect.

Materialism or idealism, who is more inclined to science? This is a contradiction, and no matter which choice you choose, it is wrong. Matter belongs to the common characteristics of things, and consciousness belongs to a kind of independent characteristics of things.

The common characteristics and independent characteristics of all things in the world are one. Matter and consciousness choose one of them.

First, the other is second, and the establishment of corresponding opposing theories is nothing more than ignorance in the cognitive pattern.

Of course, materialism is more inclined to science, because idealism believes that I think, therefore I am, while materialism believes that matter exists objectively no matter what, which coincides with the scientific view.

Science is academic is ideology, engineering technology is skill contact with matter, science is idealism, engineering technology contact with material can be called materialism, can produce matter, so idealism depends on engineering technology to produce materialism, material can be exchanged, so as to produce ** and economy, and then promote the imbalance between low materialism and high-tech materialism, idealism will engage in ideas around the country to prevent engineering technology, materialism or towards engineering technology to serve idealistic science!

The definitions, theories and methods of operation and the customary fields of science are all materialistic. Idealism, on the other hand, is a deeper science, and is more studied in the field of religion in general. In fact, the mind is the root of things, the mind and things are one, and things are the form of the mind.

This involves a higher level of understanding and mental methods, which requires substantial progress through cultivation and is closely related to the individual's mental nature.

Idealism and materialism are just a means of understanding the world, and they are only standing at the current level of understanding, an understanding of the world. If you have to say who is more inclined to science, I think it is better to say who is more inclined to science now, I think it is materialism. It can also be said that the current level of science and technology is more in line with the world and is materialistic.

Chen's Universe Model (Chinese Taiji Universe Model): As long as it is an "ism", whether it is materialism or idealism, it is the product of human consciousness, and human consciousness may or may not be scientific. Therefore, there is no question of who is more scientific between the two, and it is necessary to take matters into account.

Materialism and idealism are two different worldviews, idealism is more perceptual and materialism is more rational when it comes to understanding things. Rationally looking at things will be more objective, so materialism is more biased towards science.

Of course, it is materialism, idealism exaggerates subjective initiative, materialism emphasizes that subjective desires conform to objective laws, and facts have proved that the power to dominate and transform reality does not come from simple thinking activities, but from the correct reflection of thinking on the objective world, and this correct reflection comes from the first place, first of all, material practical activities.

Another analogy is the relationship between action and reaction, materialism believes that the action force is one, and the reaction force is two. Idealism, on the other hand, does not see it that way, they believe that the reaction is very strong, so there is the theory of spiritual omnipotence. Do not say.

Anyway, I think it's very important for the whole party to study Marxist theory as a whole.

The spirit of science is to doubt everything, so idealism can promote the sustainable development of science. However, science needs to be verified, so it is materialism that proves that idealism is the means to promote the development of science.

Science was developed by materialism, which exists only in the philosophical category. Materialism believes that the world is composed of materials, consciousness is people's understanding of matter, and the process of people's understanding of matter is science.

Idealism is the most advanced philosophical thinking of human beings, questioning and demonstrating unknown natural phenomena, Einstein is a great philosopher and an idealist and materialist, a physicist and a mathematician.