Saiyang 2 4 is better or Shanlong 2200 is better

I'll give you the answer first, and I'm explaining to you why. The answer is yes! Reason:

1.Clock frequency >

You just look at the numbers.

2.In the past, people often said that AMD is cost-effective, because AMD2200+ is actually calculated by Intel, it's**yes**, but the performance is performance.

3.The Sempemp Dragon 2200+ can be overclocked to 2400+, but it is also super in any way.

4.And if you don't use it in the future and want to sell it. (You will definitely sell it in the future) AMD 2200+)**Compared with**, it is much less. It wasn't a grade then!

It's definitely Saiyang, and it's clear that it clocks at a higher frequency than the latter (one is, one is> so it runs faster than the latter.

In fact, these are all products that have been eliminated, and the performance is almost the same, but Saiyang is a little better than Sempron 2200.

Six of one and half a dozen of the other. Don't even buy it now. It's still 2500+.

The upstairs brother miscalculated pull.

1000+ is not equal to 1g

AMD and Intel have different conversion methods.

2200+ according to Intel's, it's just about that.

But AMD's decision is compared to Intel's fast dora .

2200+ is still better if it is not overclocked, and now it is generally Celeron D,

Celeron's good point, after all, is Intel's.

What do you do than that.,It's all early CPUs.,What is there to compare with this high-frequency and low-energy garbage of Celeron.,Any flash dragon is stronger than him.,Can't be compared with Pentium.,It's supposed to be a speeddragon compared to Pentium.。。。

Both the Sempron 2500+ K7 and K8 have used this PR value.

It is estimated that the landlord is referring to the K8 Semblem of the core of Palermo In that case, it must be a better Semblem It has a built-in memory controller The memory performance is much stronger than the opponent And the K8 architecture is excellent In the case of low frequency and low heat, the performance can at least tie the opponent Overclocking performance is also very good Many can go up to 300 external frequency At present**Very cheap within 20 The cost performance is very good.

And Celeron has CD325 and CD326 two models corresponding to 478 and 775 interfaces respectively If 478 is cheaper, 775 now you have to buy 100+ It is very cost-effective and the heat is also large.

Nonsense, of course it's celeron's, the performance is a little stronger than the sparkling dragon is 478 pins of 2500 pins is 462, anyway, which one to buy cheaply, the performance is about the same configuration 9550 is completely OK ! It's still okay to play CF

It's all a more garbage pull

What else can you buy in the market now? ~

Yours is the real thing

The 2 CPUs are definitely different from different companies

Hello. Personally, I recommend 2500+, overclocking and playing performance is a little better, but the overall hardware has been used for a long time, and if you use 775 pins, the performance will be okay.

It must be Semploon 2800+, although the second-level cache of Athlon 2200+ is larger than that of Sempsaurus 2800+, but after all, the main frequency of Sempron 2800+ is much higher than that of Athlon2200+, and because AMD's CPU first-level cache is relatively large, the dependence on the second-level cache is not as large as Intel's CPU, so the impact on performance is not very large if the second-level cache is smaller.

Athlon 2200+ is good, although the main frequency is low, but L2 is higher than Sparkle, and the cache cannot be increased, and the main frequency can be supercharged If the main frequency of the two sides is not much different, it is still super to compare it.

Athlon 2200+ is better.

The flash dragon is the athlon that was brushed down on the production line, and the second-level cache is not large enough.

Compared with the two, the cost performance of the flash dragon is better, and the installation is still with the flash dragon.

Athlon 2200+ is dual-core, are you still a flash dragon!

The Semptosaurus 2800+ is 754, which is not suitable for you.

Judging from the value of the upgrade alone, 30 yuan Yesan has been upgraded from 1700 to 1800 main frequency, the architecture is still new, and this bend is relatively calculated.

That's not right upstairs. The garbage is also a bright spot.

Back to the point. Personally, I feel that the flash dragon set is more practical, and the game speed will be faster than Seyan.

Finally, I would like to persuade the landlord that the CPU is so cheap now, don't buy these outdated things. The CPU has a big impact on the speed of the computer. If you have a lot of money, it's better to match it"core", rather the graphics card is integrated (now playing games integrated graphics card + more CPU is definitely stronger than poor CPU + garbage graphics card).

It's all the same thing, it's basically garbage now, fifty steps laugh a hundred steps.

The 462 2800+ front-end bus is also 333, and the external frequency is 166, and the external frequency and the bus are indeed easy to confuse. I'm in a similar situation to you, so I feel it deeply.

I have two Barton 2500, one yellow plate can not exceed the frequency doubling, and the other green plate has a default voltage of 200x11, which is very stable, but the temperature is too high, and now the standby is 59 degrees. That's okay in the summer. Fortunately, there is a flash dragon 2200+ at hand, and the silent electricity 200x9 is very stable.

The temperature standby is more than 40 degrees. Later, I compared it several times, and I didn't feel that 2500+ super to 200x11 was much faster than 2200+ super to 200x9, including the boot time was comparable.

The most worth mentioning and what you are most concerned about is that 2200+ is super to, better than 2500+ default, you can obviously feel that the speed is much faster, and the external frequency 200 is cooler than 166.

The default external frequency of 2200+ is 166 and the bus is 333, which is the same as 2800+.

I'm using the 2200+ to talk to you right now, and two Barton 2500s and another P4 are sleeping there.

2800+ default external frequency 166, front-end bus 333, octave 12, the octave is too high to think of 200 external frequency is almost impossible. It is recommended that you still use 2200+ ultra, and the external frequency increase is better than the 2800+ with low external frequency and high octaprecation! The most important thing is that 2200+ super to 200 external frequency is very stable,200 is a standard external frequency will not harm the hardware,The old Internet cafes used to do this,This CPU is produced to make it super useful,Almost every piece can be silently electric200x9,It was a strategy of AMD manufacturers at that time。

Let's talk about so much first, hehe! If you have any questions, just look for me!

It's all 333, there's nothing to doubt about this, 2800+ is definitely better, the main frequency is higher, it's easier to overclock to the same main frequency than 2500+, other hardware is relatively stable, it's all old, safety first.

The constitution is not the same. You try it differentlyThe octaper is different.

2800 good, of course. Overclocking is detrimental to the CPU. And the buses are all 333.

If you are not an enthusiast and pursue a limit of hardware play, I suggest you do not overshoot. It is equivalent to an electric light, if you increase its power supply voltage or current appropriately, it will be quieter and brighter, but the consequence is that the life span is shortened.

Of course, proper overclocking can speed up the operation of the microcomputer, and this limb makes the scum also have to have the motherboard and memory to cooperate.

Generally speaking, overclocking doesn't have much effect.

It is recommended not to roll the brother.

If you don't get it right, it can also damage the CPU

AMD's CPU voltage is quite high, and the temperature is high.

The overclocking temperature is not good, don't burn the CPU in the eggplant, just keep it in check.

Older CPUs can generally be overtaken.

Athlon 2200+ is good Sparkling Dragon 2400+ is just an advantage.

Equivalent to the comparison of Ben IV and Celeron.

Athlon 2200+ and Shanlong 2400+

It's like Ben Si and Celeron.

Which do you say is better.

The CPU mainly looks at its cache size to compare the performance!