Do you think living in a second or third tier city will be happier than living in Beijing, Shanghai

Living in a second- and third-tier city is indeed happier than Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou.

When I first started working, I went to Beijing and Guangzhou, and the house was a big problem, because I couldn't afford to rent a house in the city, and I had to squeeze the bus and subway every day to work, which was very hard.

Morning and evening classes are all rush hour, and people are crowded.

Later, when I came to the second and third tier cities, the house next to the unit was also very cheap, and I could go to work by bicycle, and the pace of life was also very slow.

In second- and third-tier cities, although the salary is small, the rent is low, and the final savings are basically the same, and the life is very comfortable, and the air is also very good.

Of course it will, life is lived by oneself, and happiness is also created by oneself. If this is the case, then people who live in the countryside will not be happy in this life. The pace of life in these first-tier cities such as Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou is too fast, and the material standard of life is very high, and it is difficult to live in that city if you do not have a stable job.

Happiness is multifaceted, not just because of your geographical location and your financial situation.

I think this person's ideas and concepts are different, and some people like this high-pressure competitive environment, so these first-tier cities have more opportunities to improve their abilities, increase their salaries, and make themselves have a better life. However, some people feel that the salary in the second- and third-tier cities, although it is not as high as the consumption in the first-tier cities, is not so high, and the pace is a little slower, so they can have more time to live, and the competition is not so cruel, so they like to be in the second-tier, second- and third-tier cities, so this person's value judgment is different.

It depends on your definition of happiness, if you are a person with lofty ideals and ambitions, living in a second- or third-tier city, there is no way for you to show your talents, you can't feel happy.

For me, there is no ambition, as long as my income can support my daily expenses, I am already very satisfied, and without the kind of survival pressure in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou, I can adjust the rhythm of life according to my inner preferences, which is happiness.

If you are optimistic, you will feel happy wherever you are.

I think it has nothing to do with the city, if I personally think that happiness is the health of the parents, the beautiful wife loves you, the children are obedient and have good grades, their jobs are stable and there are no worries, being able to maintain life is a kind of happiness, ordinary is a blessing, if you go to Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou, the economy is also the same as happiness.

This depends on personal pursuit and point of view, some people just want to be plain and stable, a well-off home is warm and warm to live a small life, living in a second- or third-tier city is very good, not so much pressure, stable and happy is good! The standards of happiness are different, as long as there is a lover to accompany the parents and children, some people say that they are happy!

In my opinion, even in a third-tier city, if you can live with your family and have a stable income, the pressure of life is not particularly great, you can take your family to go out to play during the holidays, and if you have time, you can also get together with friends, drink and chat, I think this kind of life is happy enough.

Yes, because the pace of life in second- and third-tier cities is relatively not so fast, suitable for people's lives, but not suitable for the pursuit of a better life, in fact, Xinfugan wants to be for the goals that people pursue, in fact, young people are more suitable for big cities to work hard, and then retire to live in second- and third-tier cities, it will not be so stressful.

Happiness does not depend on the quality of one's life, but on the quality of one's life. If we have family to accompany us every day to earn a lot of money, food and clothing, and work without worry, then we are all happy in **, whether you are in Beijing or a second- or third-tier city.

Among those who have left their hometowns to develop in other places, many people choose to work and live in big cities. The reason why these people make such a choice is because of the advantages of big cities, the abundance of resources, which is conducive to their own development and progress, the development platform of big cities is broad and there are many opportunities, and the environmental conditions of big cities are better and they can live more comfortably.

1. Big cities have more advantageous resources, which is conducive to their own development.

Our work and life need to travel to the corresponding resources, only when they have abundant resources, they can get a good state of development. ......Big cities have more advantageous resources, which is extremely beneficial to their own development. It is precisely because of this reason that so many people choose to go to big cities to develop and start their careers there.

2. The development platform of big cities is broad and there are many opportunities, which are suitable for their own development.

When we join the workforce, the state of the platform we are in will ultimately determine how far we can develop. ......In contrast, large cities have a broader development platform and more opportunities, which is extremely beneficial for personal development. ......Therefore, it is extremely advantageous to choose to go to a big city for development?

3. The environmental conditions in big cities are better, and you can live more comfortably.

The fundamental purpose of our hard work in the workplace is to develop our own career, achieve our own goals, and then meet our own life needs. ......In contrast, the living conditions in big cities are relatively better, and you can get better environmental conditions by going to work and live in big cities, so that you can live more comfortably and work more comfortably. ......It is precisely because of the above reasons that so many people choose to go to big cities for development.

Big cities have many advantages, such as better job opportunities, richer cultural life, better public transportation and better educational resources, so they attract a large influx of people, many of whom do not take into account some of the negative effects, such as high cost of living and housing prices, poor air quality, traffic congestion, etc.

First of all, the cost of living in big cities is generally high, and rent, transportation, food and other prices are generally more expensive, which makes living in big cities a greater financial pressure. Young people who pursue a high quality of life often need to pay more unscrupulous labor, and overtime has become commonplace. At the same time, due to the generally high housing prices in large cities, many people have to choose to live in small crowded apartments, and the quality of life has been greatly affected.

Secondly, traffic congestion in large cities is often a headache, travel time will be significantly extended, and a large number of ** and traffic flow also bring greater pollution pressure to the urban environment. Although the development of public transport has played a positive role in alleviating these problems, it still causes peak traffic periods due to the fact that many people need to travel at different times and routes, which causes great inconvenience to urban residents.

Finally, the competitive pressure of large cities cannot be ignored. Big cities are densely populated, industries are developed, and competition is fierce, and every newcomer has to face more fierce competition in the workplace. And, as the cost of living rises and the city expands, more and more residents are complaining about the negative impact of the city and are trying to find better living and better opportunities on the periphery.

All in all, the main reason why many people want to go to big cities is to seek better economic opportunities, but the pressure of life and resource friction in big cities are also inevitable. Before making a decision, we should conduct an in-depth assessment of our financial capabilities, rationally analyze our personal needs and goals, and then choose an appropriate living environment.

1. Economic PressureThe four first-tier cities are the economic centers and innovation centers of the country, with the headquarters and R&D centers of many large enterprises, financial institutions and high-tech enterprises, and are one of the important areas to attract talents. But at the same time, these cities are also facing economic pressures. Problems such as high housing prices, high living costs and high transportation costs have increased the burden of people's lives, and many young people have encountered difficulties in starting a family and starting a business, and many even want to leave these cities in search of more suitable development opportunities for themselves.

2. Population Aging and the Two-Child Policy In addition to economic problems, the aging of the urban population and the two-child policy are also one of the reasons affecting the growth of the urban population. The four major first-tier cities have completed a period of rapid development, while other emerging cities are developing rapidly, and with the increasing degree of population aging, many young people prefer options such as family life and returning to their hometowns, resulting in a relative decline in urban population. 3. Policy ChangeFinally, policy change may also be one of the reasons.

In recent years, some cities have introduced a series of policy measures aimed at slowing down urban population growth and reducing environmental pollution and living pressure. With the disappearance of the Chinese population dividend, the population control policy of ** continues to escalate, if a large number of foreign population into the first-tier cities, it is bound to ** rise housing prices, leading to the aggravation of the problem of social raids. What signal does this negative growth trend send?

First of all, this reflects the phenomenon of imbalance in the development of the city, which needs to be readjusted and optimized in urban planning, environmental protection and economic policies to create a better development environment. Secondly, this shows that population outflow has become an important aspect of urban social problems, and attention should be paid to the construction of public service facilities, focusing on improving the living environment and public transportation, cultivating new industrial momentum and new markets, and attracting foreign talents to stay with lower costs and better services.

With the continuous advancement of urbanization and the improvement of people's living standards, more and more people choose to move away from big cities and do not like to live in big cities. This phenomenon has attracted widespread attention and discussion. In my opinion, there are both positive and negative aspects to the emergence of this trend.

In recent years, there has been a phenomenon of collective negative population growth. There could be the following reasons behind this:

1.High housing prices and living costs: Housing prices and living costs remain high in the four major first-tier cities, leading some young people to choose to settle in second- and third-tier cities.

2.Restrictions on the hukou system: The hukou system has an impact on the allocation of public resources such as education and medical care, and limits the public services enjoyed by the non-hukou population.

3.Policy adjustment: Population control policies at all levels have slowed down the population growth rate of first-tier cities.

4.New first-tier cities have risen from the ground: With the adjustment of the national development strategy, new first-tier cities such as Hangzhou, Wuhan, Chengdu and other regional central cities have risen, attracting many talents and enterprises.

These phenomena send the following signals:

1.Changes in the labor market: As the demographics change, the labor market will face more complex challenges, including upskilling and vocational training.

2.Shifting focus of urban development: As people move to second- and third-tier cities, urban construction may need to be replanned to support the development of second- and third-tier cities.

3.Diversification of the consumer market: Population mobility will drive the diversification of the consumer market in various regions, and promote the adjustment and innovation of various industries according to regional characteristics.

5.Rural revitalization: With the influx of population into second- and third-tier cities, the implementation of the rural revitalization plan will also usher in new development opportunities.

Indeed, now many people like to go to the first-tier cities, second-tier cities and other big cities, and no longer want to live in small cities, they like the kind of lights in big cities, like the kind of traffic in big cities. But they also know the hardships of the big cities, the high housing prices, and the high consumption that they can't afford.

Because no matter how hard the chickens themselves lay eggs, they will not turn their nests into phoenix nests.

People are willing to squeeze into good places, which means that there are more job opportunities there, you can see the business bigwigs you admire, and you may even have the opportunity to be the next them.

The traditional thinking of our Chinese is to be a phoenix tail rather than a chicken head. You can't be a manager in a department of a small company as well as an ordinary clerk in a large company. Therefore, people would rather go to the big city to live desperately in the north than settle down in their own small city.

Because they still have hope in their hearts, they may still become the kind of people they want to be, as long as there is a glimmer of hope, they will not give up, and they will not be willing to go back to the small city.

And no matter how hard these people try, they can't turn the second- and third-tier cities into first-tier cities, because the apex of their efforts is there, because the apex of their efforts is there.

For this topic, in fact, what I want to say is that asking this question shows that you are still very simple and do not understand society at all. But for daring to bring up such a topic, I sincerely give you a thumbs up!

The development of a city is not determined by the will of an individual, is it true that if a person says I want to develop, the city will develop? This already involves the national strategic level. If you can do things well by thinking about them, then it's not a thing.

Now the second- and third-tier cities don't need BRT, subways and other means of transportation, but how many cities actually have subways built?

The contrast between first- and second-tier cities is mainly based on differences in population and income, which affect the purchasing power of each different region. The current situation in China is that the population of second- and third-tier cities is definitely smaller than that of large cities, and large companies and capital do not consider areas with small investment populations because they need to consider the number of employees. Due to the lack of capital in the city, there is no redundant employment window, and talents in second- and third-tier cities have no other choice but to run to first-tier cities, which forms a vicious circle.

Urban development should also be implemented according to actual conditions and in accordance with policies, first-tier cities over second- and third-tier cities not only have economic advantages, but also talent, transportation, policy, education, medical care, culture and other advantages.