Which one to choose between the entry SLR Nikon D40 kit and the Pentax k100dsuper kit?

If you don't plan to spend a lot of money to buy a VR lens, you should still go to the K100, after all, body stabilization is good for saving money.

It is better to choose D40.

The effect of automatic dust removal is not good, it is not as good as artificial air blowing, the use of anti-shake is not very large, it is better to bring a tripod to be absolutely stable, what is the reason for buying a single reflex, not for good imaging.

Although the d40's pullover is a dog's head, it is also good, the difference between Nikon's dog's head and the cow's head is not very huge, and the dog's head is also passable, unlike Canon, the difference between the cow and the dog is one day after another.

Pentax K100dsuper

The effect of the set is the same as that of the cow.

The difference between them is whether or not they save money.

In terms of quality, who dares to say that Pentax, the oldest manufacturer in Japan, is poor?

Pentax K100DSUPER is more economical and anti-shake is not important?

This is very important for newcomers.

Dust removal is not important? For newcomers, having dust can make him panic, so it's also important.

Pentax K100dsuper is the same as a good film cost-effective I feel that it is higher than D40!

D40 bar, because Nikon is a more professional brand after all.

There are more lenses.

It is recommended that you do not need to have stabilization, because it will reduce the image quality.

Like night scenes, it is best to use a tripod.

Comprehensively buy nikon

Let's buy D40.

It would be better if you spent a little more and bought a D40X. At first, no one expected the D40X to perform so well. I'll use it again.

I advise you to buy Nikon's.,In fact, everyone thinks it's very important that the fuselage anti-shake and dust removal systems are some chicken ribs.,Let's talk about anti-shake first.,Anti-shake can only be in a limited range.,It's only faster than 2 3 gears, right? Just turn the ISO up one gear! If you want to talk about dust removal, first of all, the dust is not so easy to fall on the CCD, even if it falls, it will not stick so firmly, just blow it!

And the landlord didn't want to buy other lenses, there was no opportunity to change lenses, and the dust couldn't get in at all!

Again: Nikon and Canon are the originators of photographic equipment, both in terms of technical content and product quality are far beyond other brands, of course, this is just my own point of view If you want to buy, you can only choose between Nikon and Canon, and other brands are forgotten Moreover, Nikon and Canon entered the DSLR much earlier than Pentax, and both have their own high-end machines, and the technology and software of many high-end machines are also continued on machines like D40, of course, some shrinkage, but the maturity of the whole software is still very good! Including some shortcuts, key combinations, etc., this can not be done by other brands of machines!

And the most important thing, the imaging quality of the CCD, Canon Nikon's CCD has been changed for several generations, and the others have just been developed, so there is no need to say much about the rest, right? And Nikon has a huge library of lenses, with thousands of lenses to choose from, and what about the others???

Speaking of body stabilization, it's actually not as good as I thought, if it's really so good, Nikon and Canon's flagships would have been installed a long time ago!

Does the landlord already know?

Several upstairs to explain have been explained, and there is only one sentence left: Nikon is better for you than Pentax.

I bought a d40 and it works pretty well.

**Moderate, performance is also good.

I still have a D70 and a new D200 at home.

I'll choose Nikon!

Nothing P to say, K100D, connoisseurs recommend you.

4000 is recommended to be on the Nikon D40X parallel goods set, which is good for dust and water resistance.

I personally recommend KR, although they are all entry-level machines, but Pentax's workmanship is absolutely first-class, KR is still a metal body, durable leather and KR** cheap. The various detailed settings and functions in the camera are not available in Canon and Nikon's entry-level cameras, and if the economic capacity is limited, then the KR comes with a sleeve for superior imaging, and the coating is good, and the UV mirror can be saved without buying. If you use it well, the imaging is not bad, and it can be used as a practice for a long time.

Disadvantages: Pentax, as a niche in the SLR, is sometimes despised by C and N users when it is brought out, and if it doesn't matter, then it can be ignored.

This is my personal experience!

The best performance is Pentax KR, let's talk about the disadvantages first.

His shortcomings are only three grids, there are not many sales channels, and there are only three official maintenance points in my country, and finally the so-called lens group is not rich enough.

Let's talk about the pros. 1, KR It is a fuselage anti-shake with a fuselage motor. Canon Nikon uses lens stabilization, and it needs to be paired with a lens with stabilization to have the stabilization function.

2. The KR has a focus assist light that other entry-level SLRs do not have.

3, KR can directly lithium battery, and you can also use AA battery through the built-in battery holder without adding a handle.

4.Metal skeleton and colorful styles.

In addition, the KR has added a focus red dot display that was not available in the previous generation KX, which has a faster focusing speed and stronger light sensitivity performance than the KX, and the live view function has been further enhanced, and the focus on the human eye can be focused on in addition to facial recognition. The workmanship is excellent, and the three maintenance points can cope with the after-sales service in our country (although there are not many Pentax users). There are also a lot of cheap and quality old manual lenses available.

In the end, parallel traders are cheap.

Canon's recommended. Entry-level anyway.

SLRs basically consider Nikon and Canon's.

The Canon 50D I use, Nikon's has not been used, and it is not good to evaluate.

But from the bottom of my heart, I still like Canon, I don't know why.

Judging from these three machines, they are all plastic bodies anyway, and there is no difference in feel, so the price is there. I feel that Canon can choose more lenses in the future. The 1100d is also beautiful, and the red and silver ones are very good.

The entry-level is all about playing and practicing, so why not buy a fashionable one?

If it is better than D3100, Pentax KR and Sony A450, A550 are recommended

However, the A550 is estimated to only have 2 lots. But it's actually positioned a little higher.

Canon 550D is not recommended, that feel is too bad. I've used it before, and it's like plastic.

Seeing that you care so much, you shouldn't have a lot of money. So I think you won't put too much into burning shots in post-production.

That's why I recommend Pentax KR, it's the most cost-effective and fun camera. The features are comprehensive and there are few major flaws.

Some people say that Pentax has fewer lenses, so you can use sub-factory lenses. But in fact, I use Pentax cameras, and I don't think Pentax has fewer lenses at all. I'm using a Pentax K7

Pentax's machines are meticulously made, the quality is very good, and the feel is very good. The colors are amazing!

If you use KR, you can use the kit in the early stage. 4100 yuan, you can buy a waterproof machine. The quality of the waterproof sleeve is even better than the sleeve. And I think it's better.

If you love to travel, you can choose Pentax 18 135 or 16 45 lenses in the future, which are very cheap. And it's perfect for taking pictures.

Canon's 550D, now our tax-included price is 4129 yuan with a ticket, 550D's performance is slightly better than D3100 as a whole, 550D body with motor, easy and fast focusing, D3100 can only focus manually with AF head. I don't recommend Pentax, he has too few shots, and the post-production selection is a big trouble. Sony's machines also have this problem, and his SLR is not so cheap at the moment.

Specifically, the Nikon D40 can only use a lens with its own focusing motor, otherwise it cannot autofocus.

Pentax is a relatively small number of shots. But as long as you're willing to focus manually, there's quite a lot of lenses available. As long as you can screw on the body, there is anti-shake. It seems that spot metering can work.

In addition, Pentax's domestic ** is Jebsen and Lijing Technology, and consulting and after-sales can only find these two.