How poor can the teaching quality of second and third rate universities in China be?

For such a problem, we should be more realistic and direct, and no matter what first-rate and second-rate, third-rate and ninth-rate, just to be admitted to a university, it will take a lot of effort, so what is the poor teaching quality of second-rate and third-rate universities?I take classes here in an ordinary two-book university that is a bit broken, and I have a first-hand experience of the teaching methods and quality of the teachers.

First of all, the teachers in an ordinary undergraduate college are basically doctors, and there are very few master's students. From this point alone, the knowledge and insight of these teachers are already top-notch, maybe they have not studied abroad, they have not studied foreign knowledge, but in terms of their academic qualifications, it is more than enough to teach us. Their knowledge and culture are sufficient for their teaching tasks, so there is no need to question the teacher's knowledge and teaching ability.

The poor quality of second- and third-rate universities in China cannot only be said that the teachers teach poorly, but also a large part of the students. Since these students have been admitted to these second- and third-rate universities, it shows that the level of most students is so high (except for some students who did not perform well in the college entrance examination). After they arrived at the university, without the strict discipline of teachers and parents, they completely let go of their nature, and the time for learning was almost gone, and the teachers had almost no requirements for the students in the class, which directly led to the poor quality of the class.

As an ordinary undergraduate, the university teacher's class is almost uniformly standard, with a USB flash drive and PPT, and the teacher almost does not use chalk to write on the blackboard in class. Moreover, university teachers have a characteristic of their classes, the lectures are particularly fast and have regional characteristics, that is, most of the teachers have dialects in their classes, if the local students are fine, students like us from other provinces are listening to heavenly books, the teachers speak dialects, the lectures are fast, and the students can't understand at all, can the learning efficiency of such a class be high?The quality of teaching is naturally poor, and students can't understand the content of the teacher's lectures in class, and they don't do a good job of preview and timely review after class, so they don't learn anything at all.

Those so-called second- and third-rate universities, although they are said to be universities, there is still a big gap between the school's facilities and experimental equipment and those universities of the 985 211 category. Needless to say, although the teachers are all doctors and postdoctoral fellows, there is still a gap between them and the teachers of those key universities. Naturally, there will be a large gap in the teaching quality of teachers, and there is a gap between the learning habits, learning ability, and consciousness of students in the two types of schools, and the two together will be very obvious, and the poor teaching quality of second- and third-rate universities will gradually become prominent.

In fact, in my opinion, the quality of teaching in each university is about the same, or even if there is a gap, it is within the appropriate range. I was in what everyone considered a third-rate school. Every year, there are new students who ask in Tieba before entering the school that they heard that this school is very poor, is it true?

I saw one of them below, and I think it's a good one: this school is worthy of your scores.

I'm not a score-only nerd, but your score is a simple and intuitive way to learn. There are always some people around me who compare their universities with those famous universities, and you often look at how Tsinghua University is doing, how Peking University is doing, and even how Harvard is doing. He just didn't think about it, his school can't be compared with those famous universities, so what are you compared to those high-talent students?

Do you understand that you are asked to go there to listen to the lectures, in fact, many of these people are just to be able to appear to know more when chatting.

In the case of my school, this school is not shy about being a third-rate university, and it has just been promoted for a few years. Therefore, the quality of teaching does need to be improved, and there is a shortage of teachers. But again, this school is worthy of your grades.

When this school was first upgraded, the score was almost the lowest among the two colleges, and for many people, it was an opportunity to go to undergraduate with a junior college score. Maybe when I say this, some people say that they don't care about the level of the diploma, they just want to learn knowledge. Then I don't understand, how can you only have a score in a specialty if you want to learn knowledge so much.

Of course, I'm not saying that college students studying in second- and third-rate schools are scumbags, nor do I excuse all schools. It is true that although some schools are regular schools of the state, they are completely no different from pheasant universities, just to deceive students to make a profit. I still hate this kind of school.

It's really hard to get grades in this kind of school because you don't have the resources. But most schools are still in good shape. Although our school has limited conditions, it has allocated resources for the in-depth development of students.

Therefore, as a university, the overall quality of teaching is still in line with the level of students.

In recent decades, China's society has developed rapidly, and the development of major types of colleges and universities is also uneven, some universities have just been established for more than ten years, and their strength has soared, and they can be as famous as many famous universities, but some universities have been brilliant for a while, and then they have declined in development.

1. Nanjing University

When it comes to Nanjing University, everyone may have heard of it, after all, this is a very good 985 university in China, but some people don't know that Nanjing University was called the National ** University at its most glorious time, when Nanjing University surpassed the University of Beiqing and even the University of Tokyo, and was known as the "No. 1 university in Asia". Later, after the adjustment of the faculties, the strength of NTU was not as good as before, and the "No. 1 in Asia" could only become the glory of the past, although so, NTU still has the top ten level in the ranking of universities in China.

2. Nankai University

Nankai University is a well-known double first-class university for many people, and it is also the dream of many college entrance examination students. However, after the trend of merging universities, Nankai University's lack of funds has caused him to regress, and there is no A+ discipline in Nankai in the last discipline evaluation of the Ministry of Education, which is really a bit unreasonable.

3. Harbin Institute of Technology

Harbin Institute of Technology is already a very good school in science and engineering, known as the "little Tsinghua" in Northeast China, and many students who have attended Harbin Institute of Technology have praised him, but his geographical location has really held him back. As we all know, the southeast of China is a region with better economic development, and relatively speaking, there are more opportunities, and many people will choose colleges and universities in the southeast for future development. Harbin Institute of Technology is good, but it has obvious disadvantages compared with universities that are similar but located in the southeast region.