Ask for recommendation Canon SX220 Fujifilm F505 Nikon S9100 Which one to choose?

Updated on number 2024-05-27
10 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    First of all, the characteristics of these three machines are telephoto,Wide angle,The three will not choose Nikon S9100 compared with the performance appearance,The other two are fully manual operation,Manual is very powerful,Nikon S9100 focuses on fully automatic,Manual operation is not strong。 And ** is not the lowest, Canon SX220 and Fujifilm F505 have similar performance, mention Fujifilm F505 sensor is a primary color filter Canon SX220 is not, Canon SX220 effective pixels 12.1 million optical zoom: 14x Digital zoom:

    4 times. Fujifilm F505 effective pixels 16 million optical zoom: 15x Digital zoom: 5x.

    Personally, I suggest that the Fujifilm F505 is better than the other two.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Canon SX220 is preferred

    Secondly Nikon S9100 (disadvantages, no manual function, fully automatic point-and-shoot machine 0

    Fujifilm F505 is not considered.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    I've also been comparing it for a long time, and Canon's machines are the plus: good night shadow, good photography. The disadvantage is that it is easy to heat up, and the price is slightly higher, but the advantages of Fuji are beautiful in appearance, bright colors, and the price is cheap, but the disadvantage is that the photography is not good, and it is easy to run out of focus when photography.

    Forget about Nikon's, the low-end machine is a mess, everyone who has used it knows that it will not be bought a second time (except for the SLR) after it has been used

    I chose the F505 in the end, which is cost-effective.

    It is recommended that you go to the Zhongguancun Photography Forum to take a look at the real shots of the friends, which is more intuitive to compare.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    I have referred to these 3 brands, and in the end I bought Fujifilm F505.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Both in terms of performance and appearance, the Nikon S9100 wins.

    Nikon Coolpix S9100 Specifications Release Date 2011-02.

    Body Type Consumer, Card, Telephoto, Wide-angle.

    Sensor type CMOS

    Image sensor size (1 inch.)

    The total number of pixels is 12.75 million pixels.

    Effective pixels: 12.08 million pixels.

    Lens features: Optical zoom 18x.

    Digital zoom 4x.

    Lens description Nikkor lens, actual focal length: f=

    Focusing range Wide Angle: 500mm-infinity, Telephoto: infinity close-up distance 40mm-infinity.

    Aperture range. Zoom method electronic.

    Display: Display size inches.

    Pixels & Types 920,000-pixel LCD screen with anti-reflective coating and brightness adjustment.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    I bought this camera last month, I bought it from Nikon's designated wholesaler, it was only half a month and a few days, and I rarely use it, I used it twice, and I may have taken more than 20 shots in total**, and the second time I used it, the buttons became more and more difficult to press (I felt a little difficult to press at the beginning, but I thought it was a small problem), and then almost all the buttons could not be pressed, and the machine could not be turned off after turning it on. I complained to them and strongly asked to change the camera, they pushed me around, I had no choice but to spend a relatively high ** to buy such a camera.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Fujifilm F505

    Advantages: Although it is a telephoto machine, the size is very small, the image quality of the telephoto end is also very good, Fujifilm is the color has been inherited, and the operation can adapt to the needs of different groups of people from novices to professionals.

    Cons: The camera is out of focus, and there is noise. It is easy to peel off the paint and consumes more electricity.

    Overall: the cost performance is still relatively high.

    Nikon S9100

    Cons: Poor stabilization in telephoto, color saturation is not very good, summary: if the requirements for the camera are not very high, it is still acceptable.

    So, from the big picture, it is recommended that you choose Fujifilm F505, which is more affordable and has better performance.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The camera itself Nikon is better, Fujifilm's SLR and even the body of Nikon SLR you can see. But Fujifilm's after-sales service is better than Nikon's.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    I bought the F505 myself. Later, a friend wanted to buy the latter one, and asked me to help choose it (played with it, speechless). The F505 has a full manual function.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    If it were me, I would choose Canon.

Related questions
5 answers2024-05-27

Sometimes the sensitivity is too high, just set it to 100.

17 answers2024-05-27

Actually, the S95 is much better

First of all, although both cameras have 1000 pixels, the S95's sensory elements are much larger, so the shooting effect will be significantly better, the noise will be well controlled, and the aperture is large, which can shoot a good background blur effect >>>More

4 answers2024-05-27

From the comparison of these three cameras, I think they have their own advantages, the Canon IXUS 85 IS, because it is a mid-range card machine launched at the beginning of this year, has a lot of improvements in performance and configuration, such as increasing the sensor CCD size from 1 pixel to 10 million, with IS optical image stabilization system. At the same time, it brings Canon's most advanced face priority function and motion detection function, which has the performance of a high-end machine, and the Canon ixus 860 is the only wide-angle camera that Canon is currently on sale, and the overall performance is very good, and all aspects are relatively balanced, with no major shortcomings, and sales have been very good since it was launched. It is also a card player that has not been discontinued since it was launched last year, from which it can be seen that the Canon IXUS 860 has a position in the Canon card player, and finally; Casio S10 The biggest selling point of Casio S10 is the volume, its three-dimensional reach, the thinnest part of the fuselage is only, and the weight of the fuselage is only 113g, making it the smallest 10-million-pixel card machine on the market at present. >>>More

8 answers2024-05-27

Decisively start S110,The landlord can see Canon S110 as a mini version of Canon G15,Removed Canon G15's viewfinder and flip screen,But it has added a more practical touch screen and WiFi function on digital cameras,Plus Canon S110The advantage of portability and nearly 1000 yuan cheaper than Canon G15,Although Canon G15 is more professional than Canon S110 in camera shape, Inside, though, there's no difference between the Canon S110 and the Canon G15.

7 answers2024-05-27

Due to the large CCD, the A650IS has the upper hand in noise control and image quality delicacy, and the role of 400W pixel height is secondary. But the S5IS's telephoto can really shoot a lot of things that the A650 can't shoot, and there are many shooting opportunities and much higher playability. S5The picture quality,I believe for beginners,It's not a big problem,It's enough! >>>More