Canon IXUS1000 HS Canon S95 High finger point which one is good The important thing is the feel

Actually, the S95 is much better

First of all, although both cameras have 1000 pixels, the S95's sensory elements are much larger, so the shooting effect will be significantly better, the noise will be well controlled, and the aperture is large, which can shoot a good background blur effect

Secondly, although S95 is not ultra-wide-angle, at least people are wide-angle, but 1000 does not support wide-angle, which has some impact on the scene

Again, I think the 10x optical zoom of the IXUS1000 HS is useless, whether I go to Africa to shoot lions, the telephoto is useless, the larger the light changes, the less clear it is! Unless you want to spend money on a camera with a telescope function! Besides, the general pursuit of large light change is to buy SLR, the general consumer machine is still saved, and many good SLR lenses do not have zoom, ** is still expensive!

Finally, the S95 display is 10,000 pixels, while the Ixsu1000 is only half!

I believe you have understood very well, the two are not the same grade, in fact, it can be seen from the model, the S series is better, and it supports full manual! Of course, the flagship of Canon's consumer machine is of course the G series, and the G12 is known as a quasi-professional camera, and many professional photographers use him as a backup for SLR

Well, that's all, hope it works for you

To tell you responsibly, it's S95

The S95 sensor is larger than the 1000 and therefore clearer. And the lens has a large aperture. And it's a fully manual camera... The advantages are much more than 1000.

The retro look is suitable for boys. The pop-up flash is still cool, I think.

Canon's cameras are very good, the landlord can go to the official website to see, and I heard that Canon ranked first in consumer durable camera customer satisfaction in the 2010 China Customer Satisfaction Survey, no need to hesitate, buy a camera is not a rest assured, choose Canon, hehe

Among the three, the S100V and S95 are a series, and the 100V is an upgraded version of the 95, with wider focal length coverage and wider angles, 24mm-120mm, which is more than the 28mm-105mm of the S95. The applicable surface is also wider, the weight is the same, the aperture quality is one, both of which are convex lenses, and S100V is a little thinner.

Compared with 230hs, the advantage is that the lens quality is higher, the image distortion is smaller, the aperture is much larger, and it is much easier to use when the light is poor. There are certain manual functions, such as aperture priority, shutter priority, etc., which can be added according to the shooting needs.

The 230hs is a point-and-shoot model, focusing on automatic shooting, and there is nothing artificially set. It is also small in size and light in weight. In principle, 230hs are not comparable to 100 and 95 because the price difference is 80%.

230hs imaging will not have a noticeable gap compared to 100 and 95, but due to aperture issues, the gap is more noticeable when the light is poor. And manual operation is not supported. If you don't know how to operate the aperture and shutter, then it doesn't matter.

If you are bullish on 230hs, then we recommend you 220hs as well. Although it feels like the 230 is an upgraded version of the 220 from the model, in fact, the difference between the two is not small. 220 is the main wide angle, which is a focal length of 24mm-120mm.

The 230 is the main medium and telephoto segment, which is a focal length of 28mm-224mm. For portable phones, the telephoto end is not very recommended. Wide angles are what are needed.

The only disadvantage of the 220 is that the LCD screen has low pixels, only 230,000 pixels, while the others are 460,000 pixels.

In addition, if you are looking for manual shooting and are not too concerned about volume, Samsung's EX1 is a good recommendation, ** much lower than the S95. And the aperture is also large, double dials, manual operation is very convenient. I've used it, and the imaging quality is quite high.

The Ixus takes the fashion route, a bit similar to Sony's T series, and the S series belongs to people who want to play manually, but are unwilling to bring a bulky SLR to play, and it is also an entry camera before SLR.

Canon IXUS 230 HS is the cheapest, most fashionable, worst picture quality, and simplest function, Canon S95 is currently the most cost-effective, and the picture quality is slightly higher during the day Canon S100V is a little bit, Canon S100V is an upgraded version of S95, and the picture quality is better at night, which can basically be satisfied, and the current actual price is not cost-effective until December 8.

I think that the Canon Ixus 230 HS is good, and the optical zoom reaches 8x, which is quite good. The screen is large and the picture is clear.

Canon's camera feels good overall in the hand, the metal body is colorful, and there are a lot of fun filters, and the ** shot is very rich.

Personal opinion, I hope it can help you.

It depends on your usage conditions (I don't understand the camera, I hope the shooting effect is slightly better, and it is mainly used when going out to play).

Therefore, it is not necessary to operate all manually, and it is not necessary to produce films in RAW format.

First of all, exclude the S100V, because the new machine is inflated, and 80% of the functions are not used in your current situation;

Then the S95 is excluded as it is in a series with the S100V.

Therefore, if you have to choose between the three, the IXUS 230 HS (230HS should not be licensed, the licensed product seems to be IXUS220).

Little sister buys a camera,I think it's good to buy a Sony single battery,These three,S100V has good picture quality,It depends on your silver situation,Buy Sony and Nikon's single battery,The appearance is suitable for you,Olympus's single battery can also be considered,Panasonic LX5 white is also good! Some of Sony's card looks are also suitable for you, the key depends on your silver estimate! Good advice!

If you choose these three options, I think, 100V wide angle is large, 24 is stronger than S95, and the high image quality is also 100V good!

1. First of all, exclude S95, because it is the previous generation of S100V in the same series, and it should be eliminated, but its national ** has not decreased much, and it is still around 2700.

2. S100V and 230HS are both new products released in this month, 230HS of the National Bank of China is about 1850, S100V is about to be listed, and it is estimated that it is about 3000. These two cameras are very good, according to what you said, young girls are not professional photographers, they can shoot very well, and they will not see the difference in shooting results.

3. If you generally take pictures with automatic transmission, and you also pay more attention to cost performance, buy 230hs.

4. If you want to study photography more and develop it with enthusiast photographers, you can spend more than 1,000 to buy an S100V, and then start tossing its various manual functions.

1. In terms of lenses, 1000HS is 30-300mm, S95 is 28-105mm, 1000HS telephoto is superior, S95 wide-angle is dominant The focal length is almost the same, but the S95 lens is a large aperture lens

Second, S95 is a 1-inch large CCD, and 1000HS is a 1-inch back-illuminated CMOS, both are equipped with HS noise reduction system, because the back-illuminated CMOS has an advantage in high sensitivity, so even if the area is small, the imaging in the case of bad light is similar to S95, but the gap is obvious in the case of good light, S95 is significantly better than 1000HS, because low sensitivity is not the strength of 1000HS, so this is also S95 wins

3. In terms of function, the two are basically the same, but S95 has more RAW(CR2) format, post-processing is very convenient, and it is much stronger than JPG, so S95 is slightly better than --

Fourth, on the whole, in addition to the focal length is not long enough, S95 is stronger than 1000HS no matter which 1000HS function is not cost-effective compared to the current price... Let's buy S95 anyway.。。。 It is best to choose below 3000

The aperture of 95 is large, and the sensor is also large, to put it simply.

It's 95 more clear and layered than 1000. If you learn a little simple photography, you can use manual shooting to shoot a variety of styles, which is also considered a professional DC.

1000 is a telephoto, that is, it shoots farther, and it is not used for general shooting.

Therefore, 95 is recommended, and after getting familiar with the camera, you will find 95 more fun.

The S95 is a smaller version of Canon's flagship G-series, with a larger CCD of 1 inch, complete manual functionality, and an advanced RAW storage format for post-processing, but with a slightly smaller zoom ratio of only 28-105mm.

IXUS1000HS is the newer model in the IXUS series, using a new CMOS, although it is only 1 inch, but the available ISO can be improved by two grades compared with CCD of the same area, and the zoom ratio is also larger, reaching 36-360mm, there are certain manual functions, as well as new functions such as handheld night scene and panoramic scanning, and the appearance is fashionable and thin, which is also worth recommending.

The S95 is much stronger than the Ixus1000, and the two are not in the same class at all.

The S95 is a quasi-professional machine, a portable version of the flagship G12, and the picture quality is not comparable to the IXUS series.

Night shooting can S95 is the top level of Canon DC,1 Large CCD plus HS system,High sensitivity ability is very good,Although IXUS1000 uses a back-illuminated CMOS suitable for night shooting,But after all, it is still 1 small size,High sensitivity ability is not necessarily stronger than S95。 What's more, the S95 has a large aperture, which is three times larger than the small aperture of the IXUS1000, and the ISO can be directly reduced by 3 times, and the noise generation can be suppressed at the source. So all in all, the S95 night shooting is definitely much stronger than the ixus1000!

At least twice as strong!

As for taking pictures during the daytime on weekdays, the back-illuminated CMOS is a weakness, the picture is bleak and lifeless, and it can't be compared with the large-size CCD of the S95.

ixus1000 that 360mm telephoto is really used very little, the ** focal length of daily photography is 28 112, more than 200 are very few, and even if you really want to use such a large telephoto, ixus1000 This kind of small card is not enough, you can't keep up with the focus of the bird, and you will shake if the light is slightly worse when you want to shoot the building (the telephoto will magnify the shake and narrow the aperture at the same time, which directly leads to the difficulty of shooting). In addition, in general, the larger the zoom magnification of the lens, the worse the quality of the lens, and if you look at the high-quality lenses of the SLR, they are basically fixed focus heads that cannot zoom, and even if they can zoom, they generally do not exceed 3 times.

The other professional functions of the S95 are not comparable to the IXUS1000, with full manual support, and the front and rear rings can quickly adjust the shooting parameters; Native RAW format support, post-processing is very powerful; HDR synthesis, overexposure and shadow compensation, can obtain a more forgiving ......And so on and so forth, a lot. After all, the positioning of the S series is second only to the G series of professional machines, what is the IXUS? It's just a card machine that focuses on appearance and fashion.

First, the night scene is good, both are good, 1000HS is the use of back-illuminated CMOS Night scene is a strong point S95 has a large aperture lens is not weak Overall, 1000HS night scene is a little stronger, and the operation is simple, but it is not much stronger

Second, of course, I chose a wide angle There are not many opportunities to use telephoto Wide angle and medium focal length account for 90% of daily shooting 1000hs that 36mm wide angle is basically useless. . .

3. The maximum aperture of 1000HS is, Canon S95 is, and S95 is larger (the smaller the number after the F number, the larger the aperture).

Fourth, on the whole, S95 is better, first of all, it has a full manual function, stronger control, and has a large aperture lens, 1-inch large-size CCD, daytime imaging is much better than 1000HS, but the night scene is slightly worse

The S95 has a larger sensor and theoretically better image quality.

And the S95 comes with a manual function, which is good for you to learn photography, and the aperture is also larger. It is a professional card machine.

S95, especially the night scene, will not regret with this series.