What do you think about the AA system proposed by the small boss who eats with the employees?

I think it's normal for a small boss to propose an AA system for eating with employees, because people are not obligated to invite you to dinner, which is also reasonable.

I think it's actually very normal, since he has proposed the AA system, it means that he is not talking to you as a boss, or as a friend, which is a very good choice.

It's normal.,The boss's words are very picky.,And then I'll eat with the staff.,There's nothing wrong with the technical AA system.,Even you can't ask the boss why the boss is a system.,The boss is also a person.,It's impossible to say that you always invite you to eat.。

If the boss wants to bring up the AA system with himself, I think this may be a test for himself, if so, we can propose to pay the bill silently, if I have a good relationship with the boss, I don't have to think so much, it is also very ordinary.

This situation is still understandable, because a small boss who eats with his employees does not mean to invite them, after all, a small boss has just started a business and does not have a lot of money.

Although I will feel that the boss is slamming the door in my heart, but AA's money will still be given, in the past, our company dinners were AA, after changing companies, every time the dinner party is the boss to give money.

It can only show that this boss is too stingy, maybe after eating this meal, some employees will choose to change jobs and stop working with him, because he does not have the stomach to be a boss.

In today's society, I think that if it is not for him, the AA system is also very fair, and we should respect this practice, which is very reasonable.

Then AA, I can only say that this boss is too stingy, can't he invite employees to a meal? Is a meal worth that much? It's going to be AA, such a boss really has to be convinced.

It's all said yes, small bosses, small bosses, other bosses don't make much money, and they also earn it with their own hard work, and the AA system has nothing to blame.

If I just say on the spot, how can I call you and us AA, we guys AA, you don't have to pay, hahaha, it's flattery on the surface, but it's disgusting to him.

I will give out the money for this AA, but I will feel that this boss is more stingy, and a small thing can show a person's character.

In fact, I don't think the small boss should have AA when he eats with his employees, since you want to invite others to eat, so why do you need the AA system?

It's acceptable, the province owes favors, but as a boss, it's too picky.

I think that as a boss, since I invite my employees to dinner, I should contract the expenses and appear to be generous.

I can still accept it, there is nothing wrong with this, after all, your relationship is not so advanced, and it is good that you don't owe each other.

You can go the first time, but don't go later.

How much does a boss make a year and how much do you make a year?

I think this boss has failed too much, how can it be AA system? Employees should be treated.

The company party AA system, because colleagues went home and did not participate, but was angrily reprimanded by the leading cadres that there was no sense of teamwork. How unreasonable! I don't think there's a need to be so angry, after all, for everyone, it's a voluntary thing.

First, the AA system of company gatherings is inherently boring and unreasonable.

Even if it is a company party, and it is not a spontaneous organization of employees, it is not scientific to let employees AA system, and the cost should be paid by the enterprise. If the enterprise can't do it, don't do it, and use the employees' money to save face for the enterprise, is it just pretending to be on top? This leading cadre is too high-minded, right?

If you want to be a big fat man, don't you have to pay for a meal for everyone? Everyone still says that you are good, but is it not to receive your favor?

Second, even if it is an AA system, it should not contain persecution.

If the enterprise adopts the AA system to organize the gathering, it should seek the advice of everyone and make everyone willing to participate. Don't say that you want everyone to pay, even if the company pays for it, whether the employees are willing to participate or not, you have to allow the employees to take urgent vacations, right? Who doesn't have a special situation?

What's more, it's AA system.

My colleague went home with the baby, which was an instinctive reaction to the mother's love as a mother. Someone else goes to work for a day, and I miss the children at home very much, and I look forward to going home to take good care of them, and this kind of instinctive reaction to the mother's love is too normal. Maybe someone else's child is babbling!

For her, it was undoubtedly difficult to participate in such a party!

As a leading cadre, you should have empathy and understand other people's talents. Not only do they not understand, but they have to be unforgiving to others when they return them, saying that others have no sense of teamwork. Can a leading cadre like you be convincing?

3. It is a fallacy to say that not participating in the AA party of the enterprise is not a sense of teamwork.

What is the essence of team spirit? In order to better the overall rights and interests of the elite team, everyone works together to achieve the overall goal of the same rights and interests.

If you don't participate in the AA system of the enterprise, you don't have a sense of teamwork? Like a dinner, eat nonsense, talk about wine, drunkenness, show "loyalty", shout "propaganda slogans", and the next day the wine wakes up, all of which are empty words. I've seen a lot of scenes like that!

What is the practical significance of such a meeting?

The creation of a true sense of teamwork is the recognition of the company's culture by the employees, the respect of the enterprise for the employees, and the expression of the simple feelings of the employees to the enterprise from the bottom of their hearts! It is by no means something that can be achieved by a plain AA gathering. Don't insult the intelligence of the staff!

In general, I think that the AA system of company organization gatherings is not suitable for advocacy, let alone forcing employees to participate; Leading cadres will not participate in the AA system of the enterprise party called no sense of team, is a distortion of team consciousness, is unfair to the staff! An apology should be made to the colleague and the mistake should be corrected.

If you don't come to the company's collective activities at the same time, the boss is angry, of course it is necessary. Because after all, it's a company dinner. It also reflects the cohesion of a company.

Personally, I don't think it's necessary.

The time after work belongs to the employee, and it is okay for the employee not to choose to have dinner if he has his own personal schedule, which is understandable, and there is nothing to be angry about.

There's no need, since it's the company that has a dinner, it should be borne! If it's normal for AA colleagues not to go, it should be understood! After all, no one has their own problems!

It's necessary. If you don't participate in the company's dinner, if you don't have special things, you will be unorganized and undisciplined, and you will have no sense of teamwork, and you will be easily excluded by leaders and colleagues at work, causing unnecessary trouble.

I don't think it's necessary, since it's an AA dinner, employees also have the right not to participate, and there is no need for the boss to argue, such a boss may be more domineering.

There is no need, AA dinner, colleagues are voluntary, whether to come or not is their own business, there is no need for the boss to be angry.

The boss will feel that his colleagues are not social, and he will not give himself face, because it is the company's AA dinner, of course, the boss hopes that colleagues will come, so that there can be cohesion, and it is also to give himself face to the company, and if colleagues do not come, he will feel that colleagues do not pay attention to themselves at all.

The company's AA dinner, there are no special circumstances, employees should actively participate, because this is a collective activity, for those who do not participate, the boss is angry is also reasonable.

The company dinner is still AA system, and the boss has gone, so I don't think the boss needs to work hard, because since you are AA system, people don't want to come, and you really don't need to come if you can't come.

At the company's AA dinner, some colleagues did not come, and the boss was angry, do you think it is necessary? I don't think it's necessary for the boss to be very angry about this little thing, because everyone is just happy together, as your boss, if you want everyone to come, can you pay? There's no need to be angry about that.

The company's AA dinner, some colleagues did not come to attend, the boss was angry, do you think it is necessary? I don't think there's any need for the boss to be angry if a colleague doesn't show up for the company's AA dinner. Because this is not working time.

Besides, eating is also a personal expense. I think this should be voluntary.

I think the company implements an AA dinner, some colleagues did not come to participate, the boss was angry, I think it is very unnecessary, I think this is a voluntary behavior, there is no need to go. I don't think there's any great value in participating in me, so the leader is angry.

It's not necessary, it's an AA system, if you don't come, you don't have to spend that money, and it's nothing to have one more person or one less person.

The company's buffet, some colleagues did not come to participate, tired and angry, do you think it is necessary? Although individual comrades did not come to participate in the AA system and AA system dinner group activities, I will say hello to the boss tomorrow, and the boss is angry for a reason, but there is no need to be too angry.

I don't think it's necessary, maybe it's because my colleague didn't come to me in a hurry and forgot to ask for leave.

The boss should not be angry if a colleague does not come to the company's AA dinner. Because the company's employees have the right to choose whether to have dinner together, after all, they are responsible for their own expenses.

I think this boss is too unstructured. The dinner party was angry because his colleagues didn't come. This is not a disciplined leader.

Should ask a colleague why didn't you come? If there is a valid reason, the leader should not be so angry. Besides, whether to go to dinner or not is personal freedom.

I think the boss will definitely be angry, and it is also necessary, because how can the company AA have a dinner party.

I don't think it's necessary at all, and I feel that since the boss can do this, it means that the boss is very small and narrow-minded.

Such a boss is too bad. Whether it's the dinner party or your own business that matters. As long as people go to work and do their jobs well, you have no right to interfere after work. This is not the same thing as having team spirit.

Leadership? The leader will lose his temper, because the company dinner is a tomato, if you don't go, it means that you don't respect the leader, won't he be angry?

I need to have a dinner, and some people really can't afford the money, so there is no need for the boss to be angry, this is not a difficult person.

I think the boss is angry, not because this person doesn't come, but because there are other reasons, through which you can see what happened in the factory.