How should the law sentence me??? How the law will sentence

The best way is to agree to mediate with him, at present, the issue of compensation standards for minor injury cases has been a hot topic, the country has not issued relevant standards for this, as long as his compensation does not meet the requirements, he can ask the public security organs to file a case against you and your friend, because the cause of the case is criminal, he can also go to the court to prosecute, requiring you and your friend to bear criminal and incidental civil liability.

At present, the public procuratorate's handling of minor injury cases is to conclude the case with the victim giving up pursuing criminal responsibility. However, the only way to give it up is to satisfy its claim.

Take the wrong approach.

Minor injuries are subject to legal liability, and they are criminally liable, and the other party is either a private prosecution or a public prosecution.

Because of your instigation, you are the mastermind, and your friend is directly responsible, at least the injury intentionally constitutes a criminal case attached to the civil case, and the trial can be mediated, and if the result is satisfactory, the other party can withdraw the lawsuit, and if you mishandle it, your friend will be harmed, and you will learn a lesson.

Under normal circumstances, if you just punch twice and do not hit the vital parts, there will never be minor injuries, then you are not committing a crime. If the injury is really minor, you can negotiate with the other party to pay more money, and the law will not pursue it. If the negotiation fails, and you are caught by the police, you still confess truthfully about what you have done, because you and your friend are accomplices.

Confess leniently.

This is a criminal case, and the first thing to see is whether he reports and prosecutes, and if you report the case, even if you don't betray your friend, your friend will be dealt with as an accomplice. If it's private, then it's up to you to discuss.

Laws are enacted or approved by the state and enforced by the coercive power of the state, reflecting a system of norms determined by the will of the ruling class in relation to specific material conditions of life. [1] The law is the embodiment of the will of the ruling class, and it is the ruling tool of the state.

In the mainland, the gambling industry is illegal, cannot be registered with industry and commerce, and cannot be called a recognized "corporate legal person". If a legitimate corporate legal person commits a crime, both the legal person and the boss must be prosecuted. Open a gambling business, and the "boss behind the scenes" will definitely be held accountable.

Criminal Law] Article 303 [Crime of Gambling] Whoever gathers a crowd to gamble, opens a casino, or engages in gambling for the purpose of making a profit, shall be sentenced to up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention or controlled release, and shall also be fined.

Whoever opens a casino shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, short-term detention or controlled release, and shall also be fined; where the circumstances are serious, a sentence of between 3 and 10 years imprisonment and a concurrent fine is to be given.

Criminal Law] Article 67: [Voluntary Surrender] Those who voluntarily surrender after committing a crime and truthfully confess their crimes are voluntarily surrendered. Criminals who surrender themselves may be given a lighter or commuted punishment. Of these, where the crime is relatively minor, punishment may be waived.

Where criminal suspects, defendants, or convicts currently serving a sentence who have been subjected to compulsory measures truthfully confess other crimes of their own that are not yet known to the judicial organs, they are to be considered to have voluntarily surrendered.

Criminal Law] Article 68: [Meritorious Service]Where criminals have made meritorious contributions such as exposing the criminal conduct of others, verifying the facts, or providing important leads, thus enabling the investigation of other cases, or other cases: the punishment may be mitigated or commuted; Where there is major meritorious service, punishment may be commuted or waived.

Where they turn themselves in after committing a crime and have major meritorious service, punishment shall be commuted or waived.

The Criminal Law stipulates that if a person commits the crime of gambling for the purpose of making a profit, he or she shall be sentenced to imprisonment for up to three years, deprivation of political rights for one to five years, and punishment for all illegal profits obtained by opening casinos.

Both the enterprise and the person directly responsible will be punished.

As long as they share the distribution of surpluses, they are recognized as partners, and they are served in one pot.

1. You have not registered your marriage and do not belong to the legal marriage relationship.

2. It is only a cohabitation relationship.

3. How should the issue of property division and child support arising from cohabitation be handled?

1. The issue of property division is that the income and property jointly obtained by both parties during the period of cohabitation are generally treated as joint property. Before cohabitation, property voluntarily given by one party to the other party may be treated as a gift relationship; Creditor's rights and debts formed during the period of cohabitation for the purpose of joint production and living shall be treated as joint creditor's rights and debts.

2. The two parties shall negotiate on the issue of child support for children born out of wedlock to which party will raise them; If the negotiation fails, the court shall make a decision based on the interests of the child and the specific circumstances of both parties. In principle, the child should be raised by the mother during the breastfeeding period, and if the father is in good condition and the mother agrees, the father can also raise the child. Where the child is a person with limited capacity for civil conduct, the opinions of the child himself shall be sought.

There are a few key points to be made clear.

First, the cause of death. There needs to be a clear report from the hospital that the deceased died of a heart attack and not a car accident.

Second, the traffic police only have the power to determine responsibility for traffic accidents, that is. In this traffic accident, the traffic police can determine how much responsibility the other party bears. But for the fact that he died later, the traffic police should not have the power to judge.

Third, you need to note that even if the hospital determines the cause of death as a heart attack, as long as the other party's family lawyer can prove that the car accident was the main cause of heart disease, you still cannot be exempted from liability.

Fourth, unless you can prove that the deceased's heart attack was not causally related to the car accident, you can be exempted from liability. But I think it's very difficult to get evidence for this.

Fifth, it is recommended that you adopt the method of mediation and accept the other party's claim for compensation within a reasonable limit, but if the other party opens his mouth, it is better to see you in court.

It depends on how bad they are. The general crowd brawl is once every three years, and the bad impact is once every three years.

Those who commit the crime of assembling a crowd to fight are to be sentenced to up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention or controlled release for the ringleaders and others who actively participate; In any of the following circumstances, the ringleaders and others who actively participate are to be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years: (1) Repeatedly gathering crowds to fight and fight; (2) Gathering a crowd to brawl with a large number of people, a large scale, and a heinous social impact; (3) Gathering crowds in public places or on major traffic arteries to fight, causing serious disruption of social order; (4) Assembling a crowd to fight with weapons.

Whoever intentionally injures the body of another person is to be sentenced to up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention or controlled release.

Whoever commits the crime in the preceding paragraph, causing serious injury, is to be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years; Whoever causes death or seriously injures a person by especially cruel means, causing serious disability, is to be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years, life imprisonment, or death. Where this Law provides otherwise, follow those provisions.

In this case, A and B were crossing the road when a traffic accident occurred, resulting in the death of B, and A, who was traveling with him, should have dealt with it calmly and reported the case to the traffic police department, which handled it in accordance with the relevant regulations, but A was not calm and beat C to death, and his behavior was already suspected of the crime of intentional injury (causing death), and he should bear criminal and civil liability for compensation in accordance with the law.

As for C's drug consumption and drunken driving of a motor vehicle, the public security organ should give corresponding punishment, and this cannot be a reason for A to intentionally injure C's death and be dealt with lightly.

It should be sentenced, but not too severe.

Treason will definitely be. Legally speaking, this is also a crime of intentional homicide, which is punishable by death. Hurry up and find a good lawyer and strive for less judgment!

It will definitely be sentenced to more than three years in prison.

He should still be sentenced, but judging from what happened later, A should be able to reduce his sentence.

A will certainly be convicted of treason, but the punishment will be mitigated. He can get a lawyer to help him.

It will certainly be that whether A and B are husband and wife, and whether C is drunk driving and carrying drugs, have nothing to do with A violently beating C to death;

A will be convicted of intentional homicide;

If C is carrying drugs that can be sentenced to death, the sentence for A may be reduced;

In this case, C is dead and cannot be held criminally responsible. Therefore, A will be prosecuted for the offence of intentional injury or negligence causing death, and the sentence should be mitigated as appropriate.

This has nothing to do with whether A and B are husband and wife.

A will still be convicted of intentional homicide, but because of C's circumstances, the judge will reduce the sentence in sentencing.

will be sentenced. The problem should be solved by legal means, not by violence.

Yes, it depends on how much.