Diligence is more important than method, and diligence is more important than aptitude Debate topics

Zeng Guofan and the thief, the cantilever thorn stock... Stories can be direct. The difficulty lies in the theory.

Because there is only a story, the other party may choke you back with a word. The most important thing is language skills, even if you say a wrong word, the other party bites, and you are over. Square; Only diligence without methods means that there is no efficiency in doing things.

It didn't work. (I'm afraid this is the main argument of the other side) People are not without brains, and no matter what method is used, efficiency cannot be equal to 0. (1) Theoretically speaking, the total amount of work = efficiency * time.

As long as there is enough time. It is impossible not to succeed. The story of Zeng Guofan and the thief...

2) In fact, it is much more practical to learn what you learn from hard work than to apply it with learning methods. (3) Do you think those hard-working people really have no way? How could a person who can work so hard be reluctant to spend so little time looking for a better way?

If you are diligent and have a smart brain, you will definitely get a good way. And what about those who only have good methods? He doesn't take time = 0.

Just because there is a way does not mean that he will act, and action does not mean that it will last. Does it not persist according to the human forgetting curve or =0 (4) What can a method represent? If you know the deepest method of seal carving, can you become a master?

There's a good way to avoid detours. However, if you eat the rice that has been chewed by others, will it still taste in your mouth? What's wrong with a good way?

Take shortcuts? There are no shortcuts in life! Because life is to see who walks the long road in a certain time, not who takes less time after the short distance!

This time you can be excited, other places, try to be as elegant as possible) (5) after diligence even if you don't learn so much, although it is impossible. His character, perseverance has been honed, which is more important than knowledge. (Be sure to be affectionate, and it's best to hold back tears).

Square; 1 is the best to refute, and it is the first, it is the individual who will refute 1 first, and the refutation is unsuccessful. Jump straight to the next one, and their momentum is gone. So can't jump.

Then you can only bite hard, and the more you bite, the worse it gets. If you don't skip or not, it's all over! Now please refute me.

Otherwise, I'll assume by myself, you can't use it flexibly.

Inspirational Story: Method is more important than diligence.

1. Ideas: 1. The first paragraph gives an argument.

2. Paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 give examples.

3. Summary of paragraphs 5 and 6.

2. Debate draft.

If you want to succeed and get ahead, you need to be talented, you also need good hardware and software, and you also need to be very valued today, that is, interpersonal relationships, but the most important thing should be your own hard work and diligence.

Mathematician Hua Luogeng.

"I don't deny that people have different talents, but the fundamental problem is diligence. Only by being diligent can we make up for our clumsiness, and can we truly give full play to our genius. Through hard work, people with poor talents can catch up with and surpass those who have geniuses but do not work hard."

Kobe Bryant abroad.

Practice pitching at four in the morning, David Beckham.

Will kick a free kick thousands of times, Bill Gates worked for several days in a row in the early days of programming, Edison.

It will also be experimented tens of thousands of times before the invention of the bend is successful.

China's Lei Jun.

At many annual meetings, he said that he was a model worker, and diligence was the secret of Xiaomi's success. Li Ka-shing, the long-time richest man in China, read and studied before going to bed in the early hours of the morning. Look at "Twenty-Four History".

The side batch is amazing.

In this society, there are always people who attribute their success to talent, perhaps because they really don't know the meaning of hard work, or because they deliberately mislead the public. Ordinary people often come to this conclusion because they have not thought about it in detail. Then, for things that have never been tasted or thought about, they no longer understand and do them.

As a result, the possibilities of life are becoming less and less. It also comes down to the constraints of age, body, and environment.

is still the old saying, "The current Xiaocheng has not yet reached the time to fight for talent." "We don't need to worry about whether or not we can be Hanyu.

Beethoven, Leonardo da Vinci.

And worried. It only takes a lot of action, a lot of thinking, and a lack of belief that "diligence is more important than talent". Then, talent will come at a certain moment, and inspiration will finally explode.

I think you should be the opposite. Your direct challenge system.

bai is, a pig, he du

No matter how diligent he is, can he make zhi one plus one? No, DAO can! I've never heard that the pig in the world will do one plus one?

So, talent is more important than hard work? Who dares to challenge you? Again, if someone challenges us, we're talking about people of normal intelligence, not pigs!

You can go on and say, since intelligence is normal, why are you arguing about it?

This question.

Bai let me explain to you, in philosophy, there used to be two views on the problem of cognition, one is the rational statement of Tianzhuan, and the other is the learned empirical statement. The main point of view of both sides is that rationality emphasizes aptitude, which is inherent in nature, but is acquired through learning, which can be traced back to Plato's rationalism, and Aristotle also said that learning is a similar statement. The emphasis of experience is diligence, or in other words, talent needs diligence to verify, otherwise it cannot be talented.

In fact, the real meaning of debate is that it is equally important to acquire talent and diligence, and not to argue strongly, because one's own strong argument is only a manifestation of the lack of reason. Therefore, it is enough to say that the debate is only to say the favorable aspects of oneself, and try not to say the unfavorable, do not make mistakes of principle, and simply deny the other party, but only say the unreasonable aspects of the other party. Hope it helps you a little.

Talent is more important, hard work is secondary. To give you a very simple example, some people are born to run better than you, and if you train hard, you can win a world championship. Some people are not born fast, and no matter how hard you train, you can't win a world championship.

This is talent, like a container, the bigger the container, the more things it can hold, and the smaller the container, no matter how hard it is, it is impossible.

Albert Einstein's words: Genius is 1% inspiration plus 99% perspiration, but that 1% inspiration is the most important, even more important than the 99% perspiration. In fact, this debate mainly depends on the goal, if the discerning is to reach the top, such as leading a certain field, opening up a world for mankind, and achieving any feats, then there is no doubt that talent is the most important, because there are talented and not lazy people in this world, and they can't even enter the ranks of competition without talent.

If you want to get a happy life, contribute to society, and realize yourself, then diligence is more important (in fact, hard work is more appropriate, diligence also includes brute work, and brute work still has a lot to mess up), because the goal is low, then the threshold of personal quality is gone, and the aunt who sweeps the street is not necessarily more tired than the leader of the country, no matter whether there is talent or not, as long as you are diligent enough (hard work), everyone can achieve a fulfilling life.

Without talent, no matter how diligent you are, you can't reach the highest point.

Just look at Sasuke and Naruto.

Diligence is indispensable in learning, and reasonable methods are indispensable, but methods are more important in learning, if there is no method just blindly diligent, the effect of learning is not obvious. Reasonable learning methods can make learning twice as effective with half the effort!

There will be hard work to reap and harvest, and then there are many ways to source better, without diligent exploration and experimentation, which can neither be discovered nor verified;

In most cases, most people can realize their dreams by hard work, although it is more effortless to find a scientific method, but the process of finding a method is still diligence;

Edison is a genius, but he said that 99% of his success depends on sweat, what is sweat?

Let's talk about Edison, before finding tungsten filament to make a light bulb, he failed countless times and persevered, people said that he had failed and achieved nothing, but he said that failure excluded the materials used could not be used to make light bulb hearts. See, there are some things that there is no way to talk about, you can only try them one by one stupidly, and failure is the mother of success.

The process of growth is the process of learning, without diligent learning and experience to try to accumulate experience, there is no way to know effective methods;

Whoever said that he could do everything without diligent study and hard work, with just a flash of inspiration in his head, must be the ...... that has been passed on

Haha, that's all there is to it.