Is there any compensation for injuries caused by public toys?

Hello. Injuries sustained in public places, specific locations are analyzed on a case-by-case basis.

Case: While shopping at a supermarket, Ms. Luo tripped over a cosmetic suitcase placed in the aisle by a supermarket staff, resulting in an open fracture of her left arm. The supermarket staff took Ms. Luo to the hospital and paid for the medical bills, but was unwilling to pay for other expenses.

As a result, Ms. Luo sued the supermarket for compensation for lost work expenses, escort fees, nutrition expenses and other economic losses.

The claim is against a supermarket non-employee.

Applicable regulations: If there is an employment relationship between the supermarket staff and the supermarket where the boxes are placed, the division of responsibilities between the supermarket and the employee shall be governed by Article 9 of the Interpretation of Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Personal Injury Compensation Cases: if an employee causes injury in the course of employment activities, the employer shall be liable for compensation; If an employee intentionally or grossly negligently causes damages, he shall be jointly and severally liable with the employer for compensation.

If the employer bears joint and several liability for compensation, it may recover compensation from the employee.

The supermarket should keep the passage clear, and the boxes were of course placed by the supermarket staff, but for Ms. Luo, the corresponding indemnity obligor was the supermarket and not the supermarket's employees.

The crux of the case is how to understand the reasonable limits of the security obligation. As a business place with a high degree of openness to the public, in addition to the requirements of statutory standards, the usual requirements that similar places in the industry should meet and the foreseeable possibilities should be used as the basis for judging that the supermarket has endless safety and security obligations. Due to the dense supermarket and the relatively crowded goods, the passage should be kept unobstructed without obstacles.

However, in this dispute, Ms. Luo tripped over a cosmetic suitcase placed in the aisle, and it is obvious that the supermarket failed to fulfill its safety and security obligations within a reasonable range, and the supermarket should be held liable.

If it is a quality problem of the toy car, you can sue the seller and the manufacturer, which cannot claim compensation, if it is not a quality problem but an injury caused by improper use by children.

It should be compensated by its guardian. If the negotiation fails, it can only be resolved through litigation. If the respective fault cannot be determined and the injured child is at fault, the other children shall be jointly liable for compensation to the injured child within the scope of their liability.

Where a person with limited capacity for civil conduct suffers personal injury while studying or living in a school or other educational institution, and the school or other educational institution fails to perform its educational or management duties, he shall be liable.

Article 20 of the Civil Code: Minors under the age of eight are persons without capacity for civil conduct, and their statutory **persons are to carry out civil juristic acts. Article 1188:Where persons lacking or limited capacity for civil conduct cause harm to others, the guardian bears tort liability. Where guardians perform their guardianship duties, their tort liability may be reduced.

Where a person with property who lacks or has limited capacity for civil conduct causes harm to others, compensation is to be paid from his or her own property; The guardian shall compensate for the shortfall.

Summary. Pro-<>

Glad to answer for you: Don't lose money. According to Article 137 of the General Provisions of the Civil Law, a person who infringes upon the civil rights and interests of others and causes damage shall bear civil liability and compensate for the damage in accordance with the principle of liability for damages.

Therefore, the student who took the toy should be liable for compensation for the damage caused. <>

My child's toy was taken by a classmate and hurt someone, should I lose money?

Dear <> will be happy to answer for you: don't lose money. According to Article 137 of the General Provisions of the Civil Law, it is quietly determined that if a person causes damage due to the infringement of the civil rights of others, he shall bear civil liability and compensate for the damage in accordance with the principle of liability for damages.

Therefore, the student who took the toy should be liable for compensation for the damage caused. [Xianhong Nahua].

In addition, if the child's toy itself has potential safety hazards, and the classmate who took it away had an accident, the child's family suspect can require you to bear the liability for compensation, and you should fulfill the obligation of compensation. <>

Dear, is there anything else you don't understand? You can also tell us more about your situation, and I will answer for you. <>

Summary. Dear, my child's toy was taken by a classmate and injured someone, I don't need to lose money, oh, you don't know, there is no fault, of course, if it is a very special tool, and you have a duty to keep high requirements, there may be a little responsibility. If two or more persons do not have common intent or joint negligence, but several acts carried out by them indirectly combine to produce the same harmful consequence, they shall each bear the corresponding liability for compensation according to the degree of negligence or the proportion of causal force.

My child's toy was taken by a classmate and hurt someone, should I lose money?

Dear, my child's toy was taken by a classmate, and I regretted it, I don't need to lose money, oh, you don't know, there is no fault, of course, if it is a very special tool, and you have the obligation to keep it, there may be a little responsibility. If two or more persons do not have common intent or joint negligence, but several acts carried out by them indirectly combine to produce the same harmful consequence, they shall each bear the corresponding liability for compensation according to the number of negligence or the proportion of causal force.

Kiss, did you know about this situation at the time?

My child was brought to school to play and was taken by a classmate, and the classmate accidentally injured another classmate, is my child responsible?

Kiss, in this case, there will be a little joint and several responsibility of the parent.

Summary. Hello, I'm glad to answer this question for you, how to compensate for the square toy car touched the person Answer: <>

Hello, how to compensate for the square toy car touching the person is as follows:1Determine the responsible party:

The first step is to determine who caused the accident, i.e. the occupant or the operator of the vehicle. 2.Alarm & Recorded Evidence:

Ensure that injured persons receive timely medical treatment, and keep invoices and reports of medical expenses. 4.Negotiated compensation:

The injured person can negotiate with the vehicle user or operator for compensation, including medical expenses, mental damages, loss of working hours, etc. 5.Legal Proceedings:

If the negotiation fails or the amount of compensation is unreasonable, the injured person can file a civil lawsuit through legal channels to demand reasonable compensation. Hope it helps. <>

How to compensate for the square toy car that touched someone.

Hello, I'm glad to answer this question for you, how to compensate for the square toy car touching the person Answer: Qi stupid <>

Hello, the square toy car touched the person how to compensate for the liquid ambush as follows: 1Determine the responsible party:

The first thing you need to do is determine who caused the accident, i.e. the occupant of the vehicle or the operator. 2.Alarm & Recorded Evidence:

Ensure that injured persons receive timely medical treatment, and keep invoices and reports of medical expenses. 4.Negotiated compensation:

The injured person can negotiate with the vehicle user or operator for compensation, including medical expenses, mental damages, loss of working hours, etc. 5.Legal Proceedings:

If the negotiation fails or the amount of compensation is unreasonable, the injured person can file a civil lawsuit through legal channels to demand reasonable compensation. Hope it helps. <>

Extended information: When dealing with such incidents, it is important to ensure that the injured person receives prompt medical attention and that relevant evidence is preserved. If the user or operator of the vehicle refuses to take responsibility or is unable to locate them, the injured person can report the case to the police and seek relevant legal assistance.

According to the Tort Liability Law, if a toy car in the square causes injury to another person, the user or operator of the vehicle shall bear the tort liability, including compensation for reasonable losses such as medical expenses, lost work expenses, and solatium for mental damages, and bear the corresponding legal liabilities.

In addition to medical expenses, how much do you pay for these other expenses?

This is not necessarily.

What is the standard, we hit someone else, went to the hospital, took this slight fracture, answered that I had been in a plaster cast for 23 days, and tomorrow I would fold the cast, and I argued that the other party was a housewife without a job, and asked for compensation.

At present, this compensation is different in each region, and according to your situation, you need to pay the other party's medical expenses at present.

Medical expenses to pay, how much do you usually need to pay other expenses, tomorrow the negotiation is low, do you want to talk to the teacher at the moment?

For now, you can negotiate with the other party first.