Are the Mongol invasion of the Song Dynasty and the Japanese invasion of China one and the same?

Updated on society 2024-05-16
30 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    There is a fundamental difference in the nature of the beginning. The Mongols originated in China, and were later conquered by the Han Chinese, and merged with the Han Chinese during the Qing and Min dynasties. Therefore, it was incorporated into the ranks of the Chinese nation, and the dynasty it established was also called the Chinese feudal dynasty ruled by ethnic minorities.

    The invasion of us by the Japanese is different. Although the Emperor of the Wa people originated from the Qin people, he had been mixed with the natives of the Wa land for a long time, and after 2,000 years of independent breeding, he became an independent people. So it's a foreign invasion.

    2.In a way, the Japanese waged a predatory war against me for the purpose of occupation and enslavement; The Mongols, on the other hand, resorted to dynastic warfare aimed at replacing their rule. Relatively speaking, the way of the Japanese and the nature of foreign nationalities determined that it was difficult for them to gain a foothold in the occupied areas and to achieve local supply, which made their supply lines longer and longer.

    3.In terms of historical background, after a long war against the Jin, the Song Dynasty at that time had consumed a large amount of its own national strength, and it no longer had the strength to resist the Mongols on a large scale. (30 years before the Song Dynasty was destroyed, the ** army controlled by the state was only 130,000 people) before the Mongols came to attack, the pessimism had spread, and the central and local levels only tried to protect themselves.

    The Song Dynasty no longer had the form and organizational structure of existence.

    In 37 years, although the national ** was said to be corrupt, objectively speaking, it was Chiang Kai-shek's ** period. Fifteen years have passed since the Great War of the Central Plains, and all industries of the entire country are in the best stage of development. All countries in Europe and the United States are experiencing economic crises, and a lot of capital and aid have flowed to this nascent regime.

    At the same time, Chiang Kai-shek, through the long civil war and German and American assistance, equipped a million-strong army led by General Whampoa. Moreover, when Songhu was defeated, Chiang Kai-shek decisively chose to move the capital to Chongqing, so that the entire front of the Japanese was lengthened, and his own ** and the structure of military command were preserved. Coupled with the work behind enemy lines of the Communist Party, the resistance of the entire people remained undiminished.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    The Manchus did not constitute aggression against the Ming Dynasty. There were only a few tens of thousands of real Jurchens in Manchukuo, and there were also many Han and other ethnic groups. In addition, Manchukuo entered the customs after the fall of the Ming Dynasty.

    Moreover, the Ming Dynasty was much stronger than Manchukuo, and Nurhachi only had thirteen pairs of armor in his army. It should be of a local rebellion of an independent nature.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    The difference is that the Manchus, the Mongols succeeded, and for the part of China, the Japanese failed.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Mongolia and Liaodong are Chinese territories, and the Yuan Dynasty and Qing Dynasty are naturally also China!

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The difference is that Japan has failed.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Does it make sense? Judging by what he did rather than what he said, it seems that he is not qualified to be more brutal than Japan.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    There is no difference between the Mongol invasion of the Song Dynasty and the Japanese invasion of China, it was a foreign invasion of China. The Qing Dynasty and the Ming Dynasty are normal dynastic changes, which are of the same nature as the Han Dynasty and the Tang Dynasty.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Japan tried, but was violently beaten by the Soviet army at Nomenkan, 2 divisions were almost finished, 1 division was half-disabled, and nearly 50,000 people were lost with casualties. In 1941, the Soviet Union and Japan signed a neutrality treaty, in which the Soviet Union recognized the puppet state of Manchukuo and Japan recognized the Mongolian People's Republic. From then on, Japan was completely dead to Mongolia.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    The main reason is that Mongolia has always been the sphere of influence of the Soviet Union, and the Japanese Kwantung Army learned a lesson after the First World War of Nomenkan, and its strategic focus was changed from the north to the south, and it did not dare to get involved in the Soviet Union and its sphere of influence.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    At first, it was blocked by Maozi, but later adopted a southward policy, and there was less control over the north.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    During World War II, Japan invaded Inner Mongolia. Japan also launched an attack on Outer Mongolia, and as a result, Japan was defeated by the Soviet army at the Battle of Nomenkan. After Japan negotiated with the Soviet Union, in 1941 the Soviet Union betrayed the Sino-Soviet Mutual Assistance Treaty and treacherously guaranteed that the borders of the puppet Manchukuo would not be violated, and Japan guaranteed the inviolability of the borders of the puppet Outer Mongolia.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    The Soviet Union occupied Mongolia, and Japan fought a big battle with the Soviet army at the Normen Gate, and it was defeated, so it did not dare.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Very simply, Mongolia had a large number of Soviet troops stationed, and the Kwantung Army, which had fought with the Soviet army and suffered heavy losses, did not dare to provoke it.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Why not, Nomenkan understands! The foot basin chicken originally wanted to pinch a soft persimmon, but it ended up kicking the steel plate with the first kick on the road to Mongolia.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    Why deliberately invade the Mongol .........Go grazing? ......In addition, Mongolia was not yet independent at that time.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    The invasion of Mongolia required deep into the interior of China, which was very material and financial for a long expedition. The effort is not proportional to the return, and there is no need to do so.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    This was because Japan and Mongolia were separated by a China, and Mongolia was not independent at that time; It still belongs to China, so in fact Japan cannot talk about invading Mongolia, and invading China is tantamount to invading Mongolia.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Don't make a fuss, Mongolia was cut off at that time, but it bordered the Soviet Union A devil who fought at the door of Nuomen was once autistic and doubted his life, and he dared to provoke the Soviet Union?

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Although they are all foreign invasions, there are still some slight differences.

    1.The Manchu Qing Dynasty and the Mongol Yuan Dynasty all belonged to the same land, while Japan crossed the ocean.

    2.The Manchu and Mongol Yuan moved their base camp to Middle-earth, while the Japanese made China a colony.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    The Japanese invasion was entirely alien aggression; The Manchurian and Mongolian settlements in the Central Plains were nothing more than the successful rebellion of the local regimes in China, the realization of the control of the first power, and the domination of the whole country.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    In fact, it is all the same, and in the results, the first two succeeded, and the latter failed.

    In terms of the process, the Japanese killed fewer people than the Mongol Jurchens.

    In terms of influence, the Mongols ruled for a short time and had a relatively small impact on the culture of the Han people, the Jurchens had a serious malignant impact on the Han culture by shaving their hair and changing clothes, and the Japanese had a complete foreign culture, but they did not succeed.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    Japan was defeated without occupying the entire territory of China before it was assimilated.

    And the Manchu and Mongol Yuan were victorious, and then assimilated.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    Both the Manchu and the Mongol Yuan were ethnic minorities in China and part of the Chinese nation, so they can only be regarded as civil wars! And Japan and China are facing each other across the sea, and they are here to invade and seize China's resources.

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    The difference is time and lineage, and the Manchu Qing is a foreign nomadic culture. The Japanese emperor is an ancient Chinese aristocratic with pure blood, the same farming culture.

  25. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    If the Japanese invasion is successful, there will be no Chinese nation and no Chinese history after a few years, and it will be erased from history.

  26. Anonymous users2024-01-16

    That's definitely different, the back is China's ethnic minorities, which can only be regarded as a change of regime, not an invasion.

  27. Anonymous users2024-01-15

    One is a foreign invader, the other is a foreign invader! This is the difference, not to be confused......

  28. Anonymous users2024-01-14

    Japan wanted to destroy Chinese civilization, and the Manchu Qing and Mongolian Yuan were assimilated by Chinese civilization.

  29. Anonymous users2024-01-13

    The Manchu and Mongolian invasions were only military conquests, and the Japanese invasions were also cultural invasions.

  30. Anonymous users2024-01-12

    Collective selfishness does not exist inside or outside.

Related questions
26 answers2024-05-16

State-owned enterprises and public institutions are not of the same nature, state-owned enterprises, is the abbreviation of state-owned enterprises, that is to say, the enterprise is controlled by the state, not for, a certain city, or, a local ** control of a certain place, this enterprise, all the products produced, or, what products to be produced, are regulated by the state in a unified manner, and its authority is directly under the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission. >>>More

9 answers2024-05-16

Not one nature, like is a lot of things, love is selfish, is unique.

13 answers2024-05-16

Gratitude and repaying gratitude is one nature, first there is gratitude, and then gratitude, if a person does not know how to be grateful, then naturally there is no such thing as repaying gratitude. There is no love for no reason in this world, and no one is good to you for no reason, so you can't just know how to give, but you don't know how to reciprocate. A person who knows how to be grateful, he is a talent with excellent qualities and can succeed. >>>More

12 answers2024-05-16

A lonely soul is, of course, a personality problem, but it does not exclude the size of your life circle, for example, my circle is very small, although there are only three people during work, but I don't feel lonely! At least someone was with me. >>>More

22 answers2024-05-16

It depends on what kind of person your mother is in your eyes and how she feels to you. Mother, is more disciplined and nagging, but she loves you very much, as long as the food is cooked for you, you can eat, the clothes will be washed for you, you can wear them, the bed will be made for you, and you can sleep. Everything is always done for you, and your life is to reach out for food and open your mouth. >>>More