Parents prefer sons over daughters, and now they want their daughters to share the house payment whe

If parents buy a house for themselves, and their children share the money, the daughter also has the responsibility to support her parents.

Theoretically, it should be spread. Because parents buy a house, their children have to take a hand if they have the ability. However, I also oppose the preference of sons over daughters for the elderly, they have given their sons all their life's work, and when they are old in the future, maybe their sons will not be as long as their daughters, and they will not be as intimate as their daughters.

Parents prefer sons over daughters, and now they want their daughters to share the cost of the house when they buy a house, and they should share it. Parents prefer sons over daughters is a problem of his concept, parents give birth to you once, raise you once, and share a little should also be shared, don't care.

Definitely not apportioned! If you share it, do you have your share of the house? If not, it will definitely not be apportioned.

Because if you get married in the future, you won't have a share in this house. The water spilled by the married daughter. If you don't have a lot of money, there's no need to split it.

If you are rich, you can help them.

If you want your daughter and son to share the burden together, in fact, this can be said, after all, the parents are not capable enough, and they hope that their son and daughter will help, and it can be understood, but if it is as long as the daughter helps, and the son is not allowed to help, it makes no sense.

It is fair to share it with the children.

Parents prefer sons over daughters, and now they want their daughters to share the house payment when they buy a house, should they share it? This matter should be a specific analysis of the specific problem, do your parents buy a house for them to live in, or for you to live? Or do you want to live with your brother? It's easy to distinguish between them.

This situation mainly depends on whether you have a family or not, and what your boyfriend or husband thinks.

It doesn't matter if you are a beginner couple, it doesn't matter if your daughter talks, you can write an account, isn't it okay to have a percentage of your shares? Save yourself on the trouble later.

Of course you shouldn't share it, but if you don't, your parents will be unhappy, and you decide according to your financial means.

In the countryside, daughters are generally married outside, so parents do not have enough money, can only buy a house for their son, as the saying goes, raising children to prevent old age, after all, daughters can take care of themselves carefully when they marry elsewhere, and their parents' ability is still limited, which does not mean that they are patriarchal, but can only say that he has limited ability. He has to think about his future or old age, and buy a house for his son and have a place to settle when he is old.

Not giving a house to your daughter does not mean that you are patriarchal, but some trends are difficult to change for a while, and others may call you stupid if you buy a house for your daughter. Maybe you are a girl who helps your parents repay the loan and wants to share a part of the house when the time comes, and some people jump out and scold you for being unfilial, and the house is left for a boy or something.

In our hometown, men are inferior to women, and it is still a remote place, not to mention, girls have no status from their mother's family to their mother-in-law's family.

Maybe the man gave a dowry of 10,000 yuan, and the parents still have to take most of their savings, well, it's just how much the girl never asks for anything, because he will only be scolded, you don't give money to the family, I really want to give you money and the like, unless the family is in a good financial situation, but no one will buy a house for their daughter. The house where the parents lived for generations was followed by the son and then the grandson got married and then lived, and several sons in some families had no conscience and asked their parents when they would die, and they were so divided, hehe.

Whatever? It has nothing to do with the patriarchal preference of parents, it is still a secular issue.

In the traditional consciousness of the Chinese, it is patriarchal. Not buying a house for your daughter can also be considered patriarchal. Although society has advanced to this day, advocating equality between men and women, there is still a more or less dominant concept of boys in the depths of people's minds.

Hope it helps.

If you buy a house for your son and don't buy a house for your daughter, it's patriarchal, if you don't buy a house for your son or your daughter, you can't buy a house, it's not patriarchal, in fact, the old man is willing to buy a house for his children rather than whether he should or shouldn't, if he has the ability, he will help, and if he doesn't have the ability, he won't help.

If you don't buy a house for your daughter, you can't say that you are patriarchal. When their daughter needs to buy a house, parents will generally consider helping.

Not buying a house for your daughter is indeed patriarchal, but occasionally after all, she is married, and there are not many opportunities to come back to serve her parents, so it is understandable that parents do not buy a house for their daughter.

No, who said that if you don't buy a house for your daughter, you're patriarchal? If you can't buy a house, can't you buy a car? If the economy is limited and you can't even afford a car, then don't buy it, after all, they live their lives, and they can start from scratch, not necessarily relying on their parents, nor relying on their parents means that they are not patriarchal.

If the parents live independently and buy a house for their son, not buying a house for their daughter is patriarchal. If a son lives with his parents, there is no such thing as a preference for sons.

It depends on your economic strength, it doesn't matter if you can't afford to buy it, it doesn't matter who is lighter and who is heavier. If the economic conditions are okay and only buy a house for his son and not for his daughter, it is a preference for women over men.

Patriarchy has nothing to do with buying a house or not buying a house, if your family conditions are good enough, you can buy it, if the conditions are not very good, you don't need to buy, the custom in our country is that a man marries a daughter-in-law to go to a man's house to live So the man's family must have a house, and the daughter also wants the man's family to marry and take away, and the man's family must also have a house to live in, so don't worry about these.

Buying a house should be assessed according to the situation and ability of your family, if you have money, you don't buy a house for your daughter, then there is more or less a certain patriarchal thinking, which can easily cause family disagreement.

Not buying a house for your daughter is not necessarily patriarchal, it should be because you don't have enough money, and if you have money, you will definitely be even.

If you don't buy a house for your daughter, of course, you don't want to buy a house for your daughter, he is a celestial man, his daughter married to the south, and those in the south can also buy a house.

Not buying a house for your daughter is not the same as preferring sons over daughters, if the family has no conditions and the family has no financial ability, you can't necessarily let the family buy a house for your daughter.

Not buying a house for your daughter is not patriarchal, if the family conditions allow, you will buy a house for your daughter.

According to the family situation, the daughter does not need to consider the house when she marries, and the son needs to buy a house and start a family.

It doesn't seem to be, because marriage is generally not in the woman's house, so not buying a house for your daughter is not patriarchal!

Do you want to buy a house or not? It mainly depends on your financial strength, if the economy allows, there is nothing wrong with buying a house, not buying a house does not mean that you do not pay attention to your daughter, you also have to be considerate of your parents, you can't blame your parents for not buying a house, this is unreasonable.

It's not counting, depending on how many children you have in your family, if you have 2 daughters, this kind of buy for one and not for the other, this is a bit partial, if a boy and a girl, it is normal not to buy a girl.

In today's society, sons and daughters have the same right to inherit property. If the daughter is required to pay as much as the son in the future and be as filial to her parents, then the daughter should also prepare a dowry for the daughter when she gets married, which is not as valuable as the boy, but should also give as much as possible, so that she will not feel ashamed when she needs her daughter when she is old.

Sort of.

Generally, sons have to buy it.

If you don't buy it, you can't get a daughter-in-law.

If the family has the conditions and does not buy it, it is patriarchal.

If there are no conditions, then there is nothing to say.

Patriarchy is not something that can be judged from one thing, and many things need to be judged comprehensively. Don't label it lightly, but don't be stupid yourself, someone from here suggests.

First of all, there are also degrees of preference for sons. Some of the performances are obvious, the son is a treasure, and the daughter is the root! And others are not so obvious that they are not even visible.

Not every boy born in a patriarchal family can be like the little emperor, the whole family revolves around, and he gives whatever he wants. Not every girl born into a patriarchal family lives like a slave.

The general public discussion is about mothers' patriarchal behavior, but I have another question, why patriarchy is often female, such as mothers, mothers-in-law, grandmothers, is it true that as said on the Internet, it is often "women" who embarrass women?

Getting married and buying a house in China is generally a man's business, unless the parents have more money to buy a house for their daughter, and the daughter's boyfriend's house is surrounded by walls. It's obviously a man's business, but when the woman has no money, will she take the initiative to take on the burden that she can't bear? How do you feel about it yourself?

This cannot be considered patriarchal, it can only be said to be a custom.

Personally, I think that parents may also have their own difficulties, and there are many volumes, and this patriarchal young girl is very rare now.

Yes, my parents were like that, and they were punished.

My parents gave birth to a younger brother when I was four years old, and they have been better than me since I was a child.

I have to take care of my younger brother since I was ten years old, and I am 100% to blame for the conflict with my brother, 100% of the housework I do with my mother, and my brother didn't even wash the dishes a few times before I left.

They thought I was too young to hold a grudge, but I wrote them down. I was disgusted with them and had no feelings for my brother. Later, when I went to middle school, my grades were significantly better than my brother's, and they began to pay attention to me.

But not out of love, but out of interest, in their eyes, if I am admitted to a good university and get a good job, I can give them more pension money. In the college entrance examination, I was admitted to Shandong University according to their expectations, although it was not as good as Tsinghua University and Peking University, but it was also the best 985 in the province, and they had an unprecedented banquet for me for the first time.

I had a good time in college, and it was then that I learned that our family had two houses in their hometown, and I had probed them and none of those houses were going to be left to me. At that moment, I made up my mind, I had no love for them at all, and I would cut off relations with them after using them, anyway, they gave birth to me to take advantage of me, so they let them lose their wives and soldiers.

Not necessarily, there are many manifestations of patriarchy, but giving a house to a son does not mean patriarchy.

In rural areas, there is often a saying that "raising children to prevent old age", but in fact, raising children is not necessarily anti-aging, but the daughter is married out, and it is inconvenient to take care of herself, and it is understandable for parents to leave their house to their sons who are close to them.

What's more, most people's thinking now is that they leave the house to their son. Generally, it is rarely left to a daughter, but in fact, the inheritance of parents, whether it is a son or a daughter, has the right to distribute it.

Whether parents give a house or not does not directly indicate the preference for sons, sometimes parents consider the practical factor that "men cannot get married without a house, and women can get married without a house". As a child, it is better not to ask for your parents' house, it is better to leave it to your parents for the elderly. It is not easy for a person's life, of course, as a child, sometimes it is easy to misinterpret the wishes of the elderly, it is best to communicate with parents in time if there is a problem, after all, communication is the best way to solve the problem.

No.

If you ask this question in another way, the essence is the same, and the answer may be very different. For example, you ask:

My grandfather only gave the house to my uncle, and my mother didn't have anything, is my grandfather patriarchal?

Another example: my wife's parents gave the house to my brother-in-law, my wife has nothing, and when she gets married, she wants my family to leave the house, are my mother-in-law and father-in-law patriarchal?

Another example: I am a man, I have an older sister (or younger sister), my parents gave me a house, my sister (or sister-in-law) needs my brother-in-law (or brother-in-law) to provide a house when she gets married, my brother-in-law (or brother-in-law) said that my parents are patriarchal, is my brother-in-law (or brother-in-law) right?

This society is generally dynamically balanced, you get more here, you have to pay more there, you get less here, you pay less there, you get more and pay less, you will be poked in the backbone, you get less and pay more, this is anti-human, in today's society, there are not many fools, and there are not too many people who have masochistic tendencies.

You can feel that you are a parent, and giving the house to your son instead of your daughter is not patriarchal, but this society makes you too helpless. You can think that you are someone else's older brother and younger brother, and your parents give you a house and don't give you your sister or sister is not your parents' preference for sons, but this society has always been like this.

No. Whether it is patriarchal or not depends on whether there is a big difference between the two treatment of parents.

It doesn't mean that nowadays boys need a house to get married, but girls don't, so boys should be understood and considered first.

Not really. It's just that now the social ideology should be equal between men and women, and those who give sons and daughters should also be equal.

Not necessarily, it is not easy to draw conclusions just by looking at one thing, you have to consider it comprehensively.

No, parents are not obligated to support their children for the rest of their lives. When my daughter becomes an adult, she has the ability to build a family for herself.