Why is Zhao Shilan tried in the United States, and has it broken the law in the United States? 10

First, it is illegal to send public servants to enforce the law without the permission of other countries. Other countries have the right to reply and stop your illegal behavior by all means. This includes digging up the trails and imprisoning and shooting your public servants.

Second: How do you keep it confidential? Coming to the U.S. on a tourist visa?

Or in what way to the United States? Do you think the U.S. security system is all pigs? Even if you manage to infiltrate the United States, how are you arrested?

Tell him that we are China** and that you are already surrounded??? What international jokes?

Third: You have successfully fooled the above, how do you bring people to China? Tell the security guards and police that this is our loved one who has been separated for many years and that we will take it home???

At that time, many countries in the world raised the issue of the emperor's responsibility for the war, and some countries demanded that he be tried as a war criminal, but the United States, which led the Tokyo trial, said that Japan could retain the emperor system and not arrest or prosecute the emperor out of the need to safeguard its strategic interests. After the U.S. occupation of Japan, MacArthur had a secret meeting with Japanese Emperor Hirohito. The two sides have always been secretive about the content of the talks.

Thirty years later, Hirohito still says: "At that time, there was a gentleman's agreement with General MacArthur, which was never revealed." "It was thanks to the patronage of the United States that Hirohito, the biggest war criminal, escaped the fate of being arrested and sentenced.

In order to protect the emperor, even the imperial family did not pursue it.

Because the Tokyo Trial was manipulated by the United States, proceeding from the national interests of the United States, if he wants to control Japan well after the war, it is impossible without the emperor, and the Japanese have believed from ancient times to the present that the emperor is the embodiment of God and that the Holy Spirit is inviolable, and if the United States sentences the emperor to death according to the requirements of the victorious powers, then it will inevitably rekindle a new fire to the little Japan that has just been defeated and let them rise up again, and if the United States wants to effectively control Japan, it must ensure that the emperor is not harmed. The matter was put to rest after MacArthur's secret talks with the emperor, and the United States later claimed that the emperor had waged the war under the coercion of the military ......All this is only for the sake of the national interests of the United States itself.

In August 1945, Lao Mei sent two flying "chickens" to Japan to lay two "eggs", killing hundreds of thousands of people at once.

Because of the wrong place, the emperor was not finished.

Durumen holds the "Sutra of Victory":

And how many eggs? One more! ”

Report**, not a single left! ”

Old Du was moved:

Tell the emperor, a basket of eggs! ”

The emperor panicked and hurried to surrender his gun!

**Momentary pride:

I'll just have two bullets, why not fight again? ”

Don't dare to fight again, just ask for a light sentence! ”

As long as you are obedient, you can not judge! ”

There are a lot of typos, forgive me!

Japan demanded that the emperor not be killed, and the United States agreed.

Because it was mainly Hideki Tojo who started the war at that time, not Emperor Hirohito, who was just a synonym.

Because the United States needs the emperor's influence in neon to further control neon.

What's in it? Didn't Kim Il Sung go unpunished for starting the Korean War? The key is to see if there is someone to protect him. The Americans kept the Japanese emperor for the post-war confrontation with the Soviet Union, and Kim Il Sung also had a strong backstage.

The United States has always imposed a blockade on Cuba, and the reason for this is historical, since Cuba was a Spanish colony, the relationship between the two countries has not been good, because the United States and Spain fought for Cuba at the beginning, and then succeeded; After Cuba became independent, it established a socialist state, which was also ideologically opposed to the United States; After the Cuban Revolution, many U.S. assets and land in Cuba were confiscated, further inspiring tensions between the two countries. Relations between the two countries have always been strained. The United States has imposed a blockade and export embargo on Cuba, but the amount is not absolutely zero, and there are still some of them.

Because the United States imposed a ** embargo on Castro's communist Cuba. Cuba's main export earnings are based on cigars. The United States has been building a ** barrier against Cuba since the time of Kennedy.

It is recommended that you learn more about the local policies, **too many whites are not enough now.

China bans the use of Clenbuterol, why does the United States allow it? It turns out that it has something to do with this.

Some of the traffic fines in the U.S. are as follows:

Driving without a driver's license: $214.

No car insurance or accident insurance while driving: $796 with 4-year suspension.

Red light: $533.

Break over 2 yellow double lanes: $425.

No U-turn: $284.

Exceeding the speed limit (1-15 km): $224.

Exceeding the speed limit (from 16-25 km): $338.

Driving too slow: $328.

Don't stop at the stop sign: $284.

When passing the transport bus, the indicator light flashes: $675.

Using a mobile phone hand while driving (first time) $160- Parking in a bus reservation: $976.

Without lights on when dark (30 minutes): $382.

Cover the car while driving in the sun: $178

Driving without a seatbelt: $160

Children without seat belts or in seats required by law: $436.

Head-mounted binaural devices while driving: $178

Since capitalism was on the rise at the time of its founding, it caught up with the first industrial revolution and then completed the second industrial revolution....Today, we pay attention to science.

First of all, the military strength of the United States is about 5 years ahead of other countries. 11 aircraft carriers. Who can compare with him. The big brother of the NATO bloc. The wars in Japan, South Korea, Israel, and the Middle East are examples of American hegemony. For the sake of profit, of course.

Education Education is the foundation of what really makes the United States a great power.

The stationing of US troops in Iraq was set up by the US military after the Iraq War to consolidate the fruits of victory.

On March 20, 2003, the United States, Britain and a few other countries launched the Iraq War without the authorization of the United Nations by sending 300,000 troops under the pretext that Iraq possessed mass destruction.

In the early days of the Iraq War, the United States amassed a total of 280,000 troops in the Gulf region to strengthen the coalition offensive. According to US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld at the time, the United States invested 151,000 troops in the Iraq war at its peak. On 1 May 2003, Bush announced that after the end of the main fighting in Iraq, the US-British coalition forces would begin to reduce the number of troops fighting in Iraq.

In October, the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 1511, authorizing the formation of a U.S.-led multinational force in Iraq. In November of that year, the total number of U.S. troops stationed in Iraq was about 130,000.

After the US military entered Iraq, it divided Iraq into four major defense zones: Baghdad, North, West, and South. The key towns in the north include Ballad, Tikrit, Mosul, and Samarra, the key towns in the west include Ramadi and Fallujah, and the key towns in the south include Najaf and Basra. The main task of the US military in Iraq is to be responsible for the security of these towns.

The number of US troops stationed in Iraq has increased or decreased in line with changes in the security situation in Iraq. Since 2006, as sectarian conflicts in Iraq have intensified, the United States has continued to increase its troops, and in 2007, the number of US troops stationed in Iraq reached a record high of 170,000.

On 17 November 2008, the United States and Iraq signed a status-of-forces agreement. According to the agreement, all U.S. combat units in Iraq will be withdrawn from Iraqi towns by June 30, 2009, and all Iraqi troops will be withdrawn by the end of December 2011.

Obama came to power in January 2009. On February 27, Obama announced plans to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq. According to the withdrawal plan, the United States will withdraw most of its troops from Iraq by 31 August 2010, leaving only 350,000 to 50,000 troops, and will withdraw all of them by the end of 2011.

By 30 June 2009, all U.S. combat units in Iraq had withdrawn from Iraqi towns, leaving only about 500 bases and a military presence outside the cities. On August 18, 2010, the last U.S. combat troops in Iraq crossed the Iraq-Kuwait border. So far, all US combat units in Iraq have been withdrawn from Iraq.

By mid-2011, the number of U.S. troops in Iraq had been reduced to more than 40,000.

But the United States has always wanted to remain in Iraq. Since 2011, the United States has repeatedly put pressure on Iran, urging it to take the initiative to ask for the overstay of US troops. However, the issue of the departure or stay of US troops is a very sensitive topic in Iraq.

To this end, the United States and Iran have conducted several rounds of tug-of-war talks. Although the Iranian side has agreed to retain a small number of US troops to train Iraqi security forces, it has resolutely refused to grant judicial immunity to the US military. In the end, the two sides could not reach an agreement.

On October 21, 2011, Obama announced a deadline for the evacuation of all U.S. combatants. On 15 December, US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta officially announced the end of the US military mission in Iraq in Baghdad, bringing the end of the more than eight-year Iraq war.

The actions of the United States violate the universally recognized norms of international relations under international law.

Iraq is being occupied by the US military.

For the sake of oil. This behavior is called aggression.

Regardless of the big killer.

If you lose a battle, you have to sign a treaty, and it is a matter of course.

This is the end of the question mark, continue to answer for each sentence:

It's all desert, too lazy to occupy.

If you don't withdraw, you can't do it, and the meat bullet is ferocious.

War is devastating.

If you can't take it, the US military spends hundreds of billions of dollars a year on military spending in Iraq, and China has no money.

The excuse of the United States is that Iraq is of mass destruction**, but it has not been found so far.

But the UN Security Council did not authorize him.

The United States is a superpower, and the United Nations cannot manage it even if it wants to. The United Nations did not agree to use force against Iraq, but the United States still sent troops to attack Iraq. If the United Nations is no longer useful, then the United States and a large number of its friends will set up another organization similar to the United Nations.

Although the United States has achieved nothing in Iraq, it still needs to preserve its military presence in Iraq.

India didn't beat us either, so why are the dung guys clamoring to beat India?

The United Nations and other countries have "severely condemned" the United States in attacking Iraq, but it is useless for the United States

The U.S. is waging war on the grounds that it is stupid, tramples on human rights, and has mass destruction.

The U.S. military presence in Iraq is also planned, and Bush has said that it will bring democracy, freedom, and happiness (albeit) to Iraq, and the U.S. military presence is to help Iraq rebuild and train security forces to ensure that Iraq is capable of responding to crises on its own.

Who does Iraq not sign a contract with??

The most stupid way is to occupy the country, and it is much easier to grab resources than to occupy the country, and the United States has no shortage of land The United States is interested in Iraq's oil resources.