Tell us what you think about cloning, shall we?

Human cloning violates the ethical principle of no harm, and cloning technology is likely to lead to a large number of miscarriages and mutilated babies.

For me, I think as long as the people who are related to him have no opinion, and the clones don't do bad things.

I believe that human cloning is a technology that cannot be realized. Because it has so many unimaginably complex problems that we don't know how to admit ourselves.

Sooner or later, he will have to be destroyed, don't delay my normal life, I can't teach him to be selfish, because that's human nature.

Contrary to the principle of ethical autonomy, for example, a couple who lost their only child in an accident and wanted him to be "given a new life" are recreated through cloning technology, and the vast majority of the genome in the body is a copy of the previous child's genome. In this way, although the parents have satisfied a certain desire to a certain extent, this whole mode of behaviour implies for the copied child an alien decision, which deprives the child of that part of his freedom which belongs to chance (the so-called principle of autonomy, which is embodied in this freedom), and one of the most important essential characteristics of man is his unrepeatable uniqueness.

The positive aspect is that the emergence of human cloning has been produced under the maturity of various technologies, that is to say, these technologies have been applied to various fields of our traditional humans, and I am afraid that it has been quite a long time, so it is a good thing for our traditional humans.

In my opinion, under the premise that cloning technology is not used to clone human beings themselves, and cause social chaos, the advantages of its development still outweigh the disadvantages.

Morality, ethics and the problems faced. Traditionally, human beings are sexually reproduced, and the advent of human cloning has shattered this notion that it is an ethical issue. On the other hand, morally, how to treat human beings and whether they can be treated as real human beings may involve various fields.

Of course, this kind of clone must be a real clone, that is, it has the same consciousness and wisdom as our traditional humans.

Personally, I think that since cloning is bound to appear, then we can only face it honestly and accept it. If it is said that since traditional human beings have evolved from tens of thousands of years, it is the result of evolution; Then let's think of human cloning as a way of evolution.

The diversity of human genes is the biological basis of human evolution, and the so-called "immortal life" that those scientific madmen want to create is actually a copy of the same gene, which may reduce the diversity of genes and is not conducive to the evolution of human beings themselves. Therefore, from the perspective of the individual, the whole, social evolution, and bioethics, we should resolutely oppose the act of human cloning.

The right to clone human beings was a big problem, on the one hand they were only part of the human body, but on the other hand they became a whole living body, which was a big contradiction.