I never figured out whether this was reasonable or not...

First of all, I think the entry point of LZ is wrong, because your premise is based on the decisive role of will, that is, any event that occurs is determined by our choice or will, so this is typical idealism, idealism is nothing, but you actually use materialist or even materialist dialectics to think about this problem, which of course will produce contradictions, hehe.

In principle, philosophical cause and effect all of us know that there must be a cause, and any result is caused by a series of reasons, since it is a series of reasons, it is difficult to extract one of them and treat it as an absolute cause. For example, before you get in the car, it was the master's wife A who asked him to come out today to do business, originally the master did not come out today, and then passer-by B also wanted to fight, but the master felt that the road was far away and refused, and then he met you and took your business, and then when passing by the three-way intersection, the master found that one of the roads occupied the road because of the parking of driver C, so he chose another road, which eventually led to the collection of money. Both the master and you are the cause of this result, of course, in fact, there are more of these reasons, so if you have to think that it is your reason, then there is no way, hehe, of course, you may be the main reason, but it is not the absolute reason.

By the way, the legal imputation of responsibility is based on the cause, and the law prevents the endless pursuit of this responsibility, such as the above is a tort, do ABC, the master and you have to be held responsible, the answer is of course no, we only pursue the most direct cause, which is also an important principle of retroactive prohibition. As for not paying for the car, because there is a driver's disclaimer, it is equivalent to a gift to you, so it is of course reasonable for you not to pay.

Hope it answers your questions

The main thing is that the one who lost the money let you pick up the money, and if you don't pick it up, others will pick it up!

It's not obsessive-compulsive disorder, it means that you subconsciously don't like to be controlled by others, and it's not rebellious, it means that you have the ability to judge, if you don't want to have such thoughts, listen to your family's actions, you realize that such problems are very good, and indeed your family is also educating you for your good, and your family will be better for you

You have a strong rebellious mentality. It is recommended that you go to psychological counseling as early as possible to correct this unhealthy mental illness. I wish you a fast and healthy start.

Because you subconsciously know that this is not true.

It can be said that your parents are against it, and you also feel that it is too early to fall in love, immature, and it is easy to make mistakes and hurt each other. No matter what, she has to think more, and she may insist on going to you and not face the reality of separation, but you still have to be like this, and then downplay it, the long pain is better than the short pain, lest she rely on you too much and end up hurting more.

There is something wrong with your question and you don't tell the truth.

Someone is in love with you, and you suddenly say you don't want to talk about it.

And you don't give a reason, it's just that you don't want to say it yourself.

It's a question that no one would accept.

How do you turn a glass of water into a glass of plain water? The easiest way to do this is to bring this glass of water to a boil, but just let it dry in the air, and it will soon turn into a cold boil. It's the same with feelings.

When you're in love, you lose interest. There is no need to explain, just to dry your mood quietly.

Find time to talk to her, and ask her when she plans to fall in love. Without waiting for her to ask, you say that you don't have the heart to fall in love. Or something.

If it's a man, don't give up! Do you know how sad she will be like this?

The outcome is known, but it hasn't happened yet. Something that doesn't happen can be changed, even if it's a 1 in 10,000 chance. In order not to regret it, people who are responsible for themselves are always willing to give it a try.

It's a good thing to want to get things done, and if you take the time, you have to get it done. However, due to various objective reasons, some things are indeed not satisfactory. But hopefully you don't lose faith in yourself just because of a few setbacks.

My advice: focus on what you do and don't overthink it. When you've done everything you need to do, everything falls into place.

Because of the outcome of things. It has to be done to the end to prove its results. The end result is the best proof of this.

There are many similar incidents at NetEase. Your rights can be upheld, but at a significant cost. There may also be more than your existing losses, are you willing to continue?

"And also used a lie detector", in China, the test results of this thing can not be used as evidence, and this thing is unexpectedly high, not the average province and city can do it, and there are few in China, all of which are for scientific research purposes. I can't think of a reasonable reason for this sentence for your question. Of course, if the police have the ability to test the panic, they cannot test it without your father's consent, otherwise this is a serious violation.

The other processes are normal, there is nothing wronged, and every citizen has the obligation to cooperate with the investigation and evidence collection. On the other hand, if people suspect your family but have no basis, bury their hatred for your family deep in their hearts. Deliberately waiting for an opportunity to retaliate, your family is in the dark in the celebrity's house, maybe the safety of your family's life and property will become a big problem.

If people suspect your family, the public security organs will investigate and collect evidence in time to help your family clear their suspicions, which is a good thing.

Article 243 of the Criminal Law Fabricating facts to falsely accuse and frame others, with the intention of subjecting others to criminal prosecution, and the circumstances are serious, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, short-term detention or controlled release; where serious consequences are caused, a sentence of between three and ten years imprisonment is to be given.

However, the investigation by the Public Security Bureau is based on procedures, and it is not a coercive measure against your father, so it is not reasonable to say that it is unreasonable

Tell you to endure it! It's good to be able to get out of the public security organs alive and completely, be content! Don't worry about it, otherwise it's hard to say.

Such a lawsuit can't be fought and is not easy to fight, it is estimated that no one will take over, and even if there is one who takes over, it is also a fraud money. Forget it! Let's get back to normal.

You can't be suspicious of others without knowing it. You just tell him that no, my family did it, and if they don't give up, you can testify with the law!

Harmony is precious, let him be three feet and defensive! You're right, don't be like them! If they don't give up, the law is on your side.

Irrationality. Talk to a lawyer about how.

Irrationality. But the police have the right to do so. If someone reports a crime, they will investigate thoroughly. Lobster farmers should have a grudge against your family to do this.

There is a very important question that you have not said, that is, why they are targeting you, and whether you have any conflicts with them.

The loan amount is determined according to your repayment ability and the time of the loan round, if Hu Xin has a certain time and the repayment ability is not enough, the bank can only reduce the loan amount. That's reasonable. Of course, it may also be that you do not belong to the 30% down payment.