Would you like to ask which one is good, the Canon EOS 600D and the Panasonic Lumix LX5?

There is not much comparison between the different types of machines.

First of all, the photosensitive elements are different, and their area sizes are very different, and 600D is definitely better than LX5.

Then, in terms of body performance and operating speed, it will also be 600D superior.

Finally, look at the lens, the LX5 lens is good, Leica-certified large wide-angle lens, excellent workmanship, if the 600D with a lens like 18-55, the effect is probably not as good as the LX5, especially in shooting landscapes, I mean the overall effect, not the effect of local magnification.

The summary is that the 600D is strong in the body performance, and the LX5 is strong in the large aperture and wide angle of the lens.

Canon 600d good....Needless to say, DSLR photography is undoubtedly Canon and Nikon.

The two cameras are too different to compare.

Upstairs is right, Fujifilm F30 F40 F60 and other cameras can definitely be seconds Canon Ixus series most models But Fujifilm's workmanship is poor. The quality and imaging effect of Panasonic is absolutely excellent Panasonic's workmanship is also particularly fine Panasonic's night effect is not very ideal because the noise processing is not very good Canon's can only be said to be average Stylish appearance Are you going to buy a camera? If you have a lot of silver, you can consider Panasonic's LX3; zs7；Or Canon's S90

The Japanese know their own brand better than us, as for the more vague, look at what model of Panasonic is compared with what model of Canon, the technology of the photographer, the environment of taking pictures, when I bought the first camera, a bunch of people pushed Canon, I bought Fujifilm F30, and the whole IXUS series can be killed in seconds (put it in a big way, it can still be killed in IXUS in seconds).

The Canon's DC color is very pleasing, but the shape is really not as pleasing as the Panasonic, and the lens quality of its flagship model (G11) is indeed not as good as that of the Panasonic flagship.

My girlfriend bought an LX3 a year ago, and I think it's a very good machine, and I'm very satisfied with everything, but I don't feel as good as I can in terms of color performance, especially for red, and Canon's high-end DC color is really good (although the color of the SLR is not very good), but it's vivid and realistic.

There is no obvious gap in the effect, and whether the blur is blurry or not depends mainly on your level.

Panasonic this one is a little smaller.

Lumix is a trademark of Panasonic Digital Camera.

"lumix" means high-end. (Chinese name: Les Mills).

Literally, lumix means "to enjoy versatility".

The Lumix digital camera is the perfect combination of Leica optics and Panasonic digital technology.

Panasonic is a big brand trademark of Panasonic, Lumix is a small trademark of Panasonic digital camera, Lumix stands for Panasonic's digital camera, it's as simple as that.

The FX78 camera is not bad, and the workmanship of the Panasonic camera is very good.

2K or so Panasonic cameras,Photographers must recommend LX3 and LX5 the most,These two are quasi-professional models,Image quality and function are very good in the same grade of models。

Lumix is Panasonic's camera line. FX78GK is very average, but there is nothing wrong with using it on a regular basis.

Canon is good , Panasonic is not very strong in terms of cameras!

Panasonic FX65 is good.

Optical zoom 5x equivalent 35mm focal length 25-125mm

LX5 licensed goods about 3400, G12 licensed goods nearly 4000, parallel goods and licensed goods in terms of quality is no different, the problem is that parallel goods are only three packs of stores, once the store disappears, then the after-sales service will end, the quality of these 2 machines is very good, but G12 is too expensive, you can ** door level SLR with header.

LX5 is really good, I'm using LX3, and there are many people around me who are using the small 5, compared with the G12, it is characterized by retro styling and large aperture. However, the handling sense of the LX5 is far inferior to that of the G12, and the LX5 is not the opponent of the G12 in portrait and high sense, so it makes sense to say that the G12 is expensive. In addition, I recommend the Olympus XZ-1, the imaging is really much stronger than the G12 and LX5!

I'm not trusting, the big idea lz take it yourself, **taobao can refer to it)

It depends on what you want to do. If you want to excel in image quality, choose the Panasonic LX5. His wide aperture is really good.

If you want to make the most of your personal creation, it's still Canon G12. Don't look at his pixels, aperture, focal length are very ordinary. His self-adjusting capabilities are unmatched by other cameras.

His white balance, light sensitivity, continuous shooting speed, and panorama mode bring out the full power of the photographer. Therefore, it is a very popular camera. Of course, it is also an indisputable fact that the highest is high, which is also caused by the high cost of his high-performance production.

As for parallel imports, as long as the acceptance procedures are rigorous, there will be no problems. At present, the copycat machine does not have the ability to imitate.