Sima Qian s corruption was all because of his opposition to the Han Dynasty s economic change?

Overemphasizing his ideological opposition to Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty and acting against the emperor is definitely not pleasing to him, so Sima Qian's punishment was caused by his own reasons.

In order to fulfill the father's wish and bear the burden of humiliation, and some people have a different impression, the punishment of the palace is actually an option for Tae Se Gong,And an exhaustive study of the history books, Sima Qian suffered a large part of the reason for his own reasons.

The era of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty was an era with a strong desire to make contributions. The Western Han Dynasty, which had flourished since Wen Jing, endowed Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty with an arrogant personalityAggressive and moody.

Second,The relationship between the Western Han Dynasty and the Xiongnu was a very sensitive topic at the time。Li Ling's surrender caused the overjoyed Emperor Wu of Han to lose face.

Third,During the period of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, he overthrew hundreds of schools and respected Confucianism。The three basic principles of Confucianism and the five theories of virtue have established that benevolence, righteousness, courtesy, wisdom, and faith are important criteria for judging the right and wrong of scholars.

It can be said that the reason why Sima Qian was punished by the emperor was because of his moody character, but also because of Sima Qian's own backward political outlook and pedantic character.

Emperor Wu of Han clearly had an angry and emotional side when dealing with Sima Qian's issue, which was not uncommon in Emperor Wu's political career。The same is true of Han Wu's handling of the case of Prince Guwu in his later years. However, there is a different view that Sima Qian had a cult of Emperor Wu of Han in his early days, which is similar to Beethoven's worship of Napoleon.

Historically, this relationship between political strongmen and law teachers has not been uncommon. Therefore, Sima Qian offended Han Wu, but after the imperial court, he still got some important positions. On the one hand, Han Wu himself understood that Sima Qian was not at fault

At the same time, it also shows that for Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, Sima Qian's role was only a small role that could be sacrificed and ignored.

Sima Tian's punishment was not related to Emperor Wu of Han's economic changes, but because he wanted to record the real things that happened.

Based on various historical materials, there are basically four reasons for the economic reform of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, in addition to the most realistic and direct disaster relief and the battle against the Xiongnu, the other two deepest and most historically influential are to solve the impact of the highly prosperous commodity economy in the early Han Dynasty on the foundation of feudal agriculture (economic), and the threat to the emperor's 0 power society, the only side of the 0 large princes 0 economic (political).

Sima Qian suffered from corruption, in fact, the main reason was that he said good things for Li Guang, and Li Guang was forced to surrender at that time.

It wasn't for this incident that Sima Qian was subjected to corruption, this was at most the last straw that broke the camel's back.

I think the main reason is that a lot of people think they're a little bad, that's why they're here

He was punished for defending Maling.

Because Sima Qian offended Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty by exculpating Li Ling, he was originally given death, but if he accepted the corrupt punishment or could buy back a life with 500,000 yuan, Sima Qian chose the corrupt punishment.

Because it was Sima Qian himself who chose to avoid the punishment of the death penalty with an extremely humiliating rotten punishment, after all, Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty was only angry for a while because Sima Qian defended Li Ling.

According to the criminal law of the Han Dynasty, there were two ways to reduce the death penalty: one was to atone for the crime with 500,000 yuan, and the other was to accept it"Corrupt punishment"。Sima Qian's family was poor and had unfinished business, so he chose to be corrupted.

Sima Qian surrendered to the Xiongnu in Li Ling, and Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty insisted on interceding for Li Ling, which caused Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty to be furious and sentenced to beheading. It was he who chose to redeem himself by being tortured to redeem himself, endured humiliation, and finally completed the swan song of the historian.

Because he defended Li Ling and said: Li Ling is not a traitor, something must have happened. At that time, Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty was angry, and after hearing this, he was very angry, and in a fit of anger, he gave Sima Qian the palace punishment.

In fact, Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty wanted to sentence Sima Qian to death at that time, but Sima Qian chose to be corrupted and escaped the death penalty.

Filial piety comes first, and no one is greater, and the use of such a criminal law is a spiritual insult to Sima Qian.

Sima Qian was not slandering Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, but recording the real facts he saw. Sima Qian was a historian, and his responsibility was to record what he saw, whether it was right or wrong, positive or negative, and to truly reflect the original appearance of every historical event. Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty is indeed a king of great talents, but no one is without shortcomings, and the achievements of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty in this life are brilliant and should be worthy of the admiration of future generations.

But he also made a lot of mistakes, and future generations should take this as a warning and summarize the lessons of their predecessors, and they can't make the same second mistake in the future, so we want to thank Sima Qian for letting us see a flesh-and-blood Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty.

A historical figure cannot be perfect, and we must see not only their strengths, but also their shortcomings。As a historian, it is his duty to record historical facts, and he cannot mix personal emotions when recording the actions of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, so we will not recognize Sima Qian's position in history, and the mistakes of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty recorded in the history books are real.

This is the biggest shortcoming of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty. Emperor Wen of Han and Emperor Jing of Han laid a good foundation for Emperor Wu of Han, but during the reign of Emperor Wu of Han, he began to carry out expansion movements everywhere, wasting national strength and failing to achieve his goal, so that the national strength of the Han Dynasty decreased a lot, and the lives of the people were not as good as before.

In the scourge of witches, Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty listened to the slander of the villain. The killing of his eldest son was the biggest unjust case of the Han Wu Dynasty, and it also led to a bloody political struggle within the Han Dynasty. Many innocent people died in this struggle, killing the crown prince, which led to the decline of the Western Han Dynasty, and Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty was an iconic figure of the Han Dynasty and a sinner of the Han Dynasty.

Because in Sima Qian's view, Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty is a special person, he is the life of the people, and the people are not happy.

As a confidant of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, Sima Qian is not slandering Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, it is because one of them has a white face and a black face, and the two of them are acting.

Because, Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty was stubborn and self-serving, he was more ruthless to Li Guang, and dealt with Li Ling's surrender to the Xiongnu too much, involving Sima Qian, and inflicting corruption on him, which made Sima Qian hold a grudge.

The reason why Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty hated Sima Qian was because Sima Qian interceded for Li Ling at that time, and Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty was already annoyed because of the defeat, so he gave Sima Qian the palace punishment in a fit of anger. Li Ling was the grandson of the famous general Li Guang, who was quite prestigious in the court at that time. However, his grandson Li Ling surrendered to the enemy, which was a disgrace in the eyes of Emperor Wu of Han.

At that time, Emperor Wu of Han was already furious. He was in no mood to ask Li Ling why he surrendered, and regarded Li Ling as a traitor in collusion with the enemy. But at that time, Sima Qian's position in the court was Taishi Ling, and he saw that it had to be fair.

Therefore, when the emperor was furious, no one dared to intercede for Li Ling. However, Sima Qian defended Li Ling.

In fact, the reason why Li Ling surrendered was indeed a last resort, not a traitor. At that time, he led only 5000 people, but he met the main forces of the enemy, a total of more than 80000 people. Even in the face of such a huge disparity in numbers and strength, Li Ling still led his army to fight the enemy for eight days and eight nights, and finally had to surrender when the food and supplies were exhausted.

As to why he didn't commit suicide, I think he had his own considerations, but I believe he was by no means a traitor.

As a result, when he was questioned by Emperor Wu of Han, Emperor Wu of Han did not know how much he had paid for this battle, and only felt that it was a shameful act for him to surrender to the enemy army. When Li Ling was questioned, no one in the court dared to stand up and intercede for him, but Sima Qian didn't want the hero to be framed like this. This is his duty and his character.

Historians should follow Sima Qian's example and dare to record the truth of history. They should be shown to future generations and preserved for future generations. The reason why Sima Qian's "Historical Records" has attracted the attention of later generations is precisely because Sima Qian wrote what he saw and heard, so that future generations can know the truth of history.

Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty hated Sima Qian very much, because Sima Qian did something that violated his principles and bottom line, and he and she went against the will of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty.

Sima Qian said in Emperor Wu's book that Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty was superstitious about the stupidity of the immortal scholars, which annoyed Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty.

Because Sima Qian said in "Emperor Wu Benji" that he was superstitious about the immortals and monks, and his actions were stupid, which made it difficult for Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty to accept and gave Sima Qian a palace punishment.

Mainly in the court, Sima Qian did not agree with Emperor Wu of Han's decision, and refuted it in person, which angered Emperor Wu of Han.

The most critical reason why Sima Qian offended Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty was that he had a disagreement with Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty on the issue of Li Ling's defeat and surrender.

Li Ling was defeated and surrendered, and was considered by Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty to be greedy for life and afraid of death.

Sima Qian believed that Li Ling had killed many enemies, and he was not greedy for life and afraid of death, but for another reason.

Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty was dissatisfied with Sima Qian's remarks and thought that he had bad intentions, so he tortured him.