Kneel down and ask all legal experts to help analyze!

One of the above acts constitutes two crimes, one is injury and the other is robbery, which in practice is punished as a felony, because minor injury is less than robbery, so the crime of robbery must be convicted.

Regarding the "cousin, 17 years old", having reached the age of committing a crime (the age of committing a crime in robbery is 14 years or older). However, since he is under the age of 18, there are statutory mitigating circumstances. At the same time, in this case, there is a statutory mitigating circumstance because of the accessory.

I reckon that your cousin should be under three years and may be sentenced to probation.

Constitutes the crime of robbery. The sentence is to be between three and ten years imprisonment and a concurrent fine. Your cousin is 17 years old, a minor, and an accomplice, so the punishment can be mitigated or commuted, and it is estimated that he will be sentenced to about three years.

1. Who took the phone? If it is not your cousin and your cousin did not know in advance that he was going to take the property, it does not constitute robbery; In addition to the crime of intentional injury, the specific person who took it also constituted the crime of theft (if the other party did not know that his mobile phone had been dropped) or the crime of robbery (if the other party knew that the mobile phone had been dropped but did not dare to take it back).

2. Your cousin has committed the crime of intentional injury, if it is a minor injury and the compensation is in place, the minor will not be sentenced to a very heavy sentence, and the sentence may be suspended;

16-18 years old can bear criminal responsibility for their 8 violent torts, your brother does not have the criminal intention to rob the mobile phone, and is only an accomplice, at most punished for intentional injury. In view of the fact that he is still a minor and is a first-time offender, if he shows remorse, the judge may give a lighter sentence at his discretion.

Article 263 Whoever robs public or private property by violence, coercion or other means shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years and shall also be fined.

Minors shall be given a lighter or commuted punishment

Intentional homicide. (There is also the possibility of intentionally harming "To Death"). There is basically not much difference in sentencing.

If the victim is obviously at fault, your friend will not be sentenced to death (immediate execution), and there is a high possibility that the death sentence will be suspended or indefinite. If your friend is not in a good financial situation, don't hire a lawyer, because a criminal lawyer is useless, and the court will assign a lawyer for you.

Article 22 of the Labor Contract Law provides special training expenses for employees and provides them with professional and technical training, it may enter into an agreement with the employee to stipulate the service period.

If the employee violates the service period agreement, he shall pay liquidated damages to the employer in accordance with the agreement. The amount of liquidated damages shall not exceed the training fees provided by the employer. The liquidated damages required by the employer shall not exceed the training expenses that should be apportioned for the unfulfilled part of the service period.

The agreement is legal.

The training agreement is basically valid because you sign it. However, if you leave your job early, you will need to be compensated if it is a normal way. But it's not 70,000 yuan, it's your amount for the rest of the period.

For example, if you stay for one year, then you need to pay 2 3 * 70,000 yuan, and if you stay for two years, it will be 1 3 * 70,000 yuan. So even the compensation is not 70,000 yuan.

The agreement of the service period shall be observed, and if the resignation is made in the middle of the job, the amount of compensation shall be the amount shared by the remaining years, not the full amount of 70,000. Whether it is worth 70,000 yuan, the unit bears the burden of proof.

First of all, the legal relationship of this issue is as follows

As for your uncle who paid for the construction, but the real estate certificate is in your grandfather's name, I think that even if your uncle has evidence to prove that he contributed capital, if there is a dispute, it is difficult to determine that the house is his, and at most it can only prove that there is a loan relationship.

Therefore, this house may be regarded as your grandfather's property and inherited by the heirs, if there is no will or bequest agreement, etc., the heirs are your grandmother, your two uncles and your mother.

Half of the other two sets belong to your grandmother, and the other half belongs to your grandfather's estate, which is inherited by the heirs mentioned above.

As for how to solve it, it depends on everyone's meaning, and the specific proportion can be calculated in the analysis of the above legal relationship to distribute

Do you mean "to build"? If it's a building, then solve it.

1. The house with your grandfather's name on it belongs to your uncle, but there must be evidence to prove that he paid for the construction.

2. The other two are the joint property of your grandfather and grandmother, and these two rooms will be inherited by your grandmother after your grandfather's death. Your grandmother can give it to whomever she wants.

3. The two houses built by your grandmother after a hundred years are treated as inheritance, and the effect: the bequest and maintenance agreement is greater than the notarized will, the notarized will is greater than the notarized will, and the legal inheritance is greater.