Knowledge can be imparted, but wisdom cannot, what does this mean?

Understand, knowledge is about things, and tends to see people as crops; Wisdom is about people, and tends to see things as people. At the same time, knowledge is often logical and free of contradictions, while wisdom is often manifested in the ability to face the intricate contradictions that actually exist. Knowledge, especially scientific knowledge, often assumes a fixed world, the structure of the model is unchanging, and treats various changes only as quantitative changes, such as a box sliding on a soil slope, generally without considering the box rubbing the surface of the soil slope out of the ditch, nor considering the wear and tear of the box.

Knowledge tends to see a changing, "conscious" (with some inclination, preference) world (person) as an unchanging, unconscious world (thing). At the same time, knowledge tends to think that the world is logical and free of contradictions.

Knowledge is easy to understand, but wisdom is different. When one discovers the finitude of knowledge, acknowledges it, accepts it, and at the same time does not give up and continues to practice, one gains wisdom. If you find that the world is not as beautiful as it says in the book, but you still don't give up on the world, then it is possible for you to see the world as it really is, and then you have your own eyes to see the world (world view).

Wise people have discovered that the world is not a fixed model, so they will not be obsessed with using a fixed model to set the world, but begin to face up to the contradictory side of the world, the paradoxical side, and begin to find ways to make the world move forward, so as to achieve the unity of opposites, and "live up to the truth".

I think that the "wave-particle duality" in quantum mechanics is the contradictory reaction inherent in the world, a combination of regular and irregular. The same is true of the phenomenon of chaos. ）

Precisely because wisdom is about people, how much wisdom a person has often does not depend on how much knowledge and how many things people experience. The generation, accumulation, and maintenance of wisdom are closely related to people's mentality, personality, and even morality. This shows the importance of mind cultivation.

In general, contented, open-minded, accessible, and tolerant people are more likely to discover and remain wise. We often describe a child as smart, and say that an old man is wise, not only because the old man has rich experience, but also because the old man can see and have a peaceful mind.

Our ordinary knowledge is actually very simple!! Knowledge can generally be expressed in language and can be learned directly; Wisdom by nature cannot be expressed in words and cannot be learned directly.

Theoretical knowledge, descriptive knowledge, language can be expressed, cycling skills, swimming skills, language can not be expressed, but through practical experience, it can be directly obtained. But wisdom itself cannot be learned in the same way as knowledge, its essence is an ability to observe and experience, an ability to connect, the need to observe one's own experience and the things experienced in actual experience, and the need to connect what is said in the book with what is actually seen.

Knowledge is generally divided into disciplines, interlaced like mountains; The partial wisdom is divided into disciplines, while the overall wisdom, the essential wisdom, is not divided into disciplines, and the wisdom of this discipline can be used in that discipline.

In order to abstract all aspects of life into data or information, a person is a decision-making model. Based on the input and the personal logic model, when we need to judge, we need to give an answer.

Why are cows cows? In fact, in cases where less information is given to make a correct judgment, it is often referred to as foresight.

The essence is that the model is powerful, and in the case of the same input, the logical model of the bull maintains a high degree of accuracy. This is that in the long run, the ox man can make better judgments than the average person, so he usually becomes the leader of the team, just like when he is in the desert, he can better judge where there is a water source.

This model is wisdom.

It's knowledge that trains the model. The reason why knowledge is not the model itself is because life itself is not so simple, if then else is enough.

The quality of the model also depends on talent and accumulation, and accumulation depends on experience, time, and effort.

So you can learn knowledge, which is something that can generally be done with effort, but whether the model is good or not, whether it is good or not, depends on many aspects.

It's like high school students practice more problem-solving methods, but few people think about why there is such an ingenious method. Our exploration of nature is, of course, based on reality, to find universal laws (of course, it is very likely to be wrong, so it needs to be constantly corrected) to constantly solve some similar problems that arise in front of us. The average person may stop thereIn fact, it would be nice to be able to do this, because after all, the world is a repetitive thing.

And the wise will derive more general principles from it, which we call "philosophy". The development of philosophy originates from a specific science and can guide a specific science, which is the truth in fact, if you observe it with your heart, the essence of many things is the same, onlyIt's just that the form of expression is different. In other words, the amount of information in the world is limited, and a large part of it is just redundant, just like having an orthogonal basis can represent infinite space.

What is knowledge? Knowledge can be taught to you by others, but the way of thinking of this knowledge cannot be taught to you by others. In other words, all wisdom can actually be summed up as:

Give relatively accurate judgments about things that have not yet been summarized as knowledge or have not been accepted by oneself. In other words: knowledge is a circle.

The more you know, the larger the radius of the circle, the more you don't know. Wisdom is something else: it gives you the ability to judge things that are not within your circle of knowledge.

Many people think that knowledge and wisdom are a concept, but they are not. Because wisdom is your way of thinking, your ability to absorb knowledge. Confucius said that if you learn without thinking, you will be reckless.

Learning is to acquire knowledge, and thinking is to extract wisdom from knowledge. Confucius is also the most particular about drawing inferences from one example. Drawing inferences from one another, and being able to generalize and judge it without learning is wisdom.

Because in the end, everything that can be taught is still knowledge after all; However, inductive deduction and touching the bypass can only be done by yourself - the teacher can't help you touch the bypass, so the wisdom must come by yourself.

Therefore, knowledge and wisdom are not the same, you can learn a knowledge very quickly, but you cannot quickly understand the origin of this knowledge. Therefore, for knowledge, it can be encoded, transmitted, and transferred, and the carriers of encoding are language, words, images, and so on. Wisdom, on the other hand, requires an individual to conduct comparative analysis based on existing knowledge through his or her personal ability, which is the process of creating value for an individual.

In short, you can accumulate a certain amount of knowledge first, and then learn how to think, so that you will have your own wisdom

Let's put it this way, a person can tell you how to teach you how to use a light bulb, but he can't teach you how to invent a light bulb. There are many things we can learn, but there are some heights that we can't reach in our lifetime.

I can teach you what everyone can learn, but I can't teach you and me the innate wisdom, wisdom is really innate, some people are very good at understanding, but some people are very poor.

For example, if a teacher teaches a class of students, and the students' grades are good or bad, that is, they are different in their ability to accept the knowledge imparted by the teacher, which means that each student has different wisdom.

Yes, knowledge and wisdom are two different concepts. Knowledge refers to the information and skills that people acquire through learning, experience, or observation, which can be specific facts, data, theories, or techniques, or the mastery of certain skills or abilities. Wisdom, on the other hand, refers to the deep insights, judgments, and comprehensions that people show in their thinking, decision-making, and actions, and it involves a wider range of universals, values, and life experiences.

Although knowledge can provide the foundation and tools for the development of wisdom, the mere possession of knowledge does not necessarily mean possession of wisdom. Wisdom requires deeper thinking, insight and experience accumulation, which goes beyond mere knowledge reserves, and requires people to understand and apply knowledge to solve practical problems, and has broader and deeper meaning and value.

Therefore, although knowledge and wisdom are interrelated, they are not the same, and knowledge cannot fully represent wisdom.

Knowledge is learned, and wisdom is wisdom.

This era is the era of knowledge and information, if you search for a keyword on the computer, countless pieces of knowledge will pop up. But you can't read it all, you won't necessarily be inspired, and you'll be overwhelmed by the ocean of knowledge.

With so much knowledge, it stands to reason that we can easily change our lives, easily get rich, and easily become healthy. The truth is that some people do it, and some people don't.

What kind of people have done it, and people who know and have done it. The reason why he was able to do it was because his conscious and subconscious minds supported it. In other words, knowledge is not only knowledge, it is also a kind of action, and it is practiced in reality and becomes a materialized thing.

There is no opposing system in the subconscious, and it is faster and more efficient to receive external knowledge and information. In reality, the ability to turn ideas into reality is stronger.

What kind of people can't do it, and those who know what they can't do can't do. This type of person is a person who thinks of a thousand paths at night and gets up in the morning to walk the old way. They know something like water that is so wet that it can't seep into the ground.

They have opposing voices in their subconscious. There is an idea, and there will be countless thoughts to negate it. So it's useless to think about it.

If you don't do it, your head is full of fantasies, and these fantasies are all small bubbles, and they take up space. When your mind is full of bubbles, your mind is not clear, you are groggy.

If the mind is not empty and drowsy, it is foolish. I have a friend who graduated from a prestigious university and has taken a lot of certificates, but he has a lot of troubles and it is very hard to make money. All she has is knowledge, and she can't figure it out, but she lacks wisdom.

When you do one thing, a little bit of knowledge, to the extreme, then in the process you will also get wisdom, the wisdom of life, the wisdom of life. Knowledge has a threshold, wisdom has no threshold, but it is not easy to obtain it.

It's not easy to get a clear mind and not get drowsy. Only by solving this problem and establishing a goal can we do things well, and only then can we use some outlets and an accelerator.

Knowledge is easy to obtain, but wisdom is not easy to obtain. Knowledge can be implemented in action, and when knowledge and behavior are united, that is the way to wisdom.

Wisdom (intelligence) is a process, not knowledge, let alone data or information, it is a state embodied by human individuals who possess knowledge when they apply knowledge to guide their daily behavior. --Chen Chunhua, "Valence Dispersion Cavity Value Symbiosis".

There was a time when the "theory that reading is useless" was popular. What about going to college? It's not the same as not working. Why do you read so many books? I think the more you read, the more stupid you become, and you are not very smart in talking and acting.

Arguments like this are not uncommon, especially when you are the boss of a primary school culture, you can become an Internet celebrity without reading for a few years and make a lot of money. These niche and extreme examples have become a powerful assist to the "uselessness of reading" theory.

In fact, it is not that reading books is useless, but that knowledge has not been applied to practice and has not been used to guide our daily life, so it has become a warehouse of the brain, with ashes that can no longer be used.

In the past, in the process of reading, some books said that they wanted to build a knowledge system, and some books said that they wanted to build a cognitive system, which was really stupid and unclear. As I read more and more, I gradually understood the difference between the two.

Knowledge is embodied in knowing, and cognition is the judgment or perception of things formed by it. For example, if you learn the art of communication in the workplace and know how to communicate effectively with people, but you never really apply it, you can only say that you have the relevant knowledge.

And after practice, it can change your perception of communication and become your ability. So having knowledge doesn't mean that you have wisdom when you repent, but about applying and guiding your life and forming cognition so that you can gain wisdom.

1. A person who has not stepped on the road with his own feet will not find a path that truly belongs to him.

2. In this Godless world, who dares to say that he has penetrated all the wrong paths and desperate situations, so that he is no longer confused and no longer needs to be searched? I will always be confused and forever searching. Confusion is my honesty, and searching is my bravery.

3. George Bernard Shaw: There are two major tragedies in life, one is not getting what you love, and the other is getting what you love. Zhou Guoping:

There are two major joys in life, one is that you don't get what you love, so you can pursue and create; One is to get what you love, so you can taste and experience it.

4. The things we are most familiar with are often the things we don't know the most.

5. There can be no love, but if there is no longing for love, there is still youth? There can be no understanding, but if there is no expectation of understanding of understanding, there is still creation? There can be nothing waiting for, but if there is no waiting, there is still life?

6. The only waiting in life that is sure that it will not be disappointed is the inevitable death. However, people seem to forget this and wait for something else, even when they are dying. I am sad and satisfied with this situation.

7. In the age of mythology, God explained everything and arranged everything for man. Mythology declined, philosophy arose, man had to explain and arrange everything by himself, and he found himself incapable of doing so almost as he was complacent. In the face of animals or animal-like beings, the awakened wisdom feels a kind of divine joy.

Faced with the universe, it is aware of its own limitations and has to suffer from the lack of divinity. Man loses God and does not become a god himself, or, in Emerson's words, a god in ruins.

8. The Westerners have repeatedly emphasized that wisdom is not knowledge, not erudition. The learned man has only knowledge of the finite and temporary, whereas wisdom is to grasp the infinite and the eternal. Due to human limitations, this goal can never be truly achieved.

9. Despite the limitations of human wisdom, loving wisdom is not in vain. The fruit of wisdom seems to be negative: theoretically - "I know that I know nothing"; In practice – "I need nothing".

However, at this point, in the humble and indifferent philosopher's breast, the pain and pleasure of wisdom have dissolved into a harmonious tranquility.

10. In the vast universe, the birth of any living being is accidental, but the departure is inevitable; The encounter between one creature and another is always a once-in-a-lifetime experience, and the separation is indeed irreversible. After all, who is different from whom, who is the end of the world in this empty world?