How do you argue if you re on the right side?

From the perspective of doting, there is also the gap between the ability to cultivate self-care and the ability to live independently at home and abroad.

Positive: The mother should help the child when he needs it It is good to let the child be independent, but the child is still young If the child does not help the child too much, it will cause a certain psychological shadow to the child, which will make the young child afraid of the mother and distrust the mother, which is not conducive to the communication between the mother and the child and family harmony, and the mother should give the child appropriate help instead of completely ignoring the children's song well: only the mother is good in the world If the child can't even rely on his own mother, then it is difficult to expect the child to have a sound psychology in the future (I also want to combine the loopholes in the counter-words, I wish you success!) ）

Square: The angle of indifference. Children are still very young, and growth needs to be done step by step, and the consequences of pulling out seedlings will be regrettable.

You can analyze the words of this mother. "Son, you'll be able to stand up on your own! This sentence emphasizes too much on the outcome, too little encouragement, and it is correct to teach children to be strong, but they should be encouraged and motivated at the right time.

To sum up, the mother's indifference can be seen in both the purpose and method of education.

Opposite: True love. I think it's easier to say that true love is long-term and planned for the future of the child.

Categories: Education, Science, >> Learning Aid.

Problem description: Debate on "Should Children Watch TV".

Analysis: Children's self-control is not high, and watching TV is easily addictive. After you become addicted, you don't know how to study or some other interesting thing!

1. Watch a little appropriately, watching too much will make the child's thinking passive, but TV will let the child's knowledge, you can also learn something, such as watching the strange nature and learning about nature, watching the program of learning English, so that the child can learn some English in an easy way.

2 can receive a lot of messages from TV, a moderate amount of watching is good for everyone, the same is true for primary school students, children also have children's world, if you don't let him watch TV, maybe he and his friends will have a lot less common topics, this is also a kind of socialization!

3 can enrich knowledge, increase the fun of life, enrich extracurricular life Watching TV as a way of information dissemination in modern society has penetrated into the lives of most people, so it is necessary to watch TV, at least it is the most intuitive and effective means to understand the external world that you can't directly contact. Primary school students should watch some cartoons, science and education films, feature films with healthy content, and some innocuous entertainment festival headlines (such as "the same song"), and if they master it well, they will be very rewarding to watch TV.

What the author is saying is that modern information will not improve understanding between people. (How to write the argument for the pros and cons of the debate). What you say in Qinxingdong will not improve.

I'm posting in line with other people's opinions. (Not original) I put some information together and put it together. You don't have to look for it.

Let's get started! Modern forms of information exchange do not improve understanding between people.

Positive: We believe that leading modern ways of communicating information will improve understanding between people. Why? Our views are as follows.

1. Modern information exchange methods are faster, more convenient and easier to communicate than before. If you have something, you can communicate immediately when you turn on your phone, so you don't have to run around.

2. Timid people don't dare to communicate positively, and it's different on the Internet, and they can recognize that they have learned a lot of new friends to communicate online, which increases the understanding between people.

Opposite: We oppose the positive side's point of view. We do not believe that it will improve understanding between people. Our views are as follows.

1. Only when people eat and chat together and communicate face-to-face, so that they can be more warm and have feelings.

2. The information exchange does not know the true face of the other party, and this kind of communication is very unfamiliar.

3. If the other party is a bad person, has an attempt on you, and gives you money to get some information after you have a good relationship, it is not for nothing that they will deceive you into some information.

As long as there is a controversial topic, it can become a debate topic.