Does webcasting corrupt the social climate?

The impact of webcasting on our lives is divided into favorable and unfavorable. Now there are many live broadcast platforms, such as pandas, bettas, Kuaishou, through live broadcasts, some people can change from a farmer to an anchor with an annual income of more than 10,000 yuan, during the live broadcast, people can ** anchor and reward gifts, gifts can be turned into money, which is part of the anchor's income. Adverse economic effects:

But this can also easily lead to some deformed live broadcasts, such as malicious competition between anchors.

The Internet gives the audience not only a sense of participation, but also a greater space for choice. Watching TV, people can view up to two pictures at the same time (provided they have a picture-in-picture TV). And on the web, people can open multiple windows at the same time to compare different **.

This mouse-directed choice is faster and more effective than the remote-commanded choice. Therefore, the autonomy of the audience has been better played, which determines that they play a more decisive role in the success or failure of **. A few seconds away from one may make him give up one and choose another.

1. It will make many anchors rarely contact with the outside world and always stay in one space 2. It does have a great impact on teenagers, and the live broadcast category should be limited to teenagers under the age of 18**, and the youth mode will be launched3, the good side is that it can express experience more intuitively, which can be used in education, and there are many benefits.

At present, most of the live broadcasts in society have no positive energy at all, which affects the normal growth of young people, and there is a serious misunderstanding of social values.

Regular live streaming eliminates the boredom of many people and reduces certain crimes; At the same time, it also gives many people the opportunity to become famous and become stars, and also gives many businesses a certain sales opportunity; It has increased the communication opportunities of netizens in different places. In this respect, it is progressive and worth advocating.

Irregular live broadcasts corrupt the social atmosphere and lead boring people astray. In this respect, it should be resolutely banned.

In short, live broadcast is a product of social development, and it will be widespread (relatively popular) in a certain period of time. We need to look at this dialectically. As a social person, we should also make reasonable use of online tools such as live broadcasting. Towards the positive.

Summary. Dear, I am honored to serve you, I hope mine can help you, according to your question The harm of vulgar online live broadcast is analyzed The answer is1、Misleading the majority of teenagers can easily make a lot of money without studying or working2、Internet vulgar language is popular in society,Not conducive to the development of national quality3、Money and hue trading makes more and more girls fall into it,Not conducive to social development4、More and more parents let their children go on live broadcasts,Want their children to become stars,Make money themselves,Seriously affect children's physical and mental health5、 In order to become famous and make money, many people frantically brush gifts to attract fans, and a vicious circle has been formed, that is, tens of millions of anchors absorb the money of millions of anchors, millions of anchors absorb the money of tens of thousands of anchors, and tens of thousands of ......... absorb dryAs a result, more and more people are invested in the live broadcast platform, at present, the platforms have reached hundreds of millions, its essence is no different from MLM, some people get rich overnight, sit and make money, crazy to show off their wealth, some people desperately climb up, want to live a life that can make a lot of money with their lips according to the current speed of development, within ten years, social morality, development will begin to slowly degenerate, and the whole society will enter a big one.

Dear, hello, I am honored to serve you, I hope mine can help you, according to your question The harm of vulgar online live broadcast is analyzed The answer is 1, misleading the majority of teenagers can easily make a lot of money without studying or working2, Internet vulgar language is popular in society, which is not conducive to the development of national quality 3, money and hue trading makes more and more girls fall into it, which is not conducive to the development of society 4, more and more parents want their children to live broadcast, Xun Biji wants to make their children become stars, and they also make money, Seriously affect the physical and mental health of children 5, many people in order to become famous and make money, crazy gifts to attract fans, has formed a vicious circle, that is, tens of millions of anchors suck millions of anchors' money, millions of anchors absorb the money of 10,000-level anchors, and 10,000-level .........As a result, more and more people are invested in the live broadcast platform, at present, the platforms have reached hundreds of millions, its essence is no different from MLM, some people get rich overnight, sit and make money, crazy to show off their wealth, some people desperately climb up, want to live a life that can make a lot of money with their lips according to the current speed of development, within ten years, social morality, development will begin to slowly degenerate, and the whole society will enter a big one.

The phenomenon of regression.

China's live broadcast industry has ushered in a stage of rapid development, and the content of live broadcast has undergone great changes. If the anchors in the live broadcast industry in the early stage mostly play games and sing as the main form of expression, then the anchors in the live broadcast industry in the later stage mostly use live broadcast sales as a way to make profits.

The post-95 network anchor revealed the chaos of the live broadcast, which attracted widespread attention and heated discussions among netizens. On the one hand: the platform canEstablish very strict penalties, such as complaining about a one-day ban at a time.

On the other hand: the platform shouldIntensify the supervision of live broadcast contentEnsure that the anchor will not make unreasonable statements and language during the live broadcast.

The first governance plan: increase the supervision of live broadcast content on the platform, both Xiaozao Prefecture and some anchors have a variety of live broadcast routines, as well as live broadcast content that affects the formation of reasonable values among young people, and all platforms should increase the supervision of live broadcast content. Severe penalties will be imposed on some anchors for exaggerating promotional slogans and using various routines to urge consumers to place orders.

When the live broadcast department of each platform increases the supervision of the live broadcast content of the anchors, even if the anchors want to get more traffic and turnover, these anchors will adopt a reasonable competition method, and there will not be too many routines. The anchor of a certain platform proposed to become the first hot search on Weibo, and the platform gave the anchor a penalty of 230,000 days.

The second governance plan: increase the punishment of the platformThe reason why some anchors will try back and forth on the issue of principle is because the punishment of some platforms is not large. When setting up regulated content, platforms can set high-risk words, and when anchors repeatedly appear high-risk words, these anchors will face serious penalties.

The platform can limit the duration and fines of the anchor according to the live broadcast content of the anchor, and initially try to block it for only 10 minutes, if the anchor violates the platform regulations again, the anchor will face a fine and a ban. All platforms must increase supervision and punishment to ensure that every anchor can transmit the correct consumption concept and value collision to people.

In general, the platform's increased supervision and punishment is only an external means, and it is still necessary for the anchors to work together to ensure that the anchors in each live broadcast room transmit the correct values to the audience. Some big anchors will **** relatively high products, but they will introduce good products to consumers in advance, and they don't want consumers who can't afford the consumption level to buy too high products. In addition, these streamers will also introduce consumers to highly cost-effective evaluation products.

Only by completing the consumption process according to the level of personal consumption and income can the quality of life of the individual be improved.

Once the platform finds that the anchor has violated the rules, it should immediately ban the account, and the anchors who violate the rules should also be warned.

Now because the short ** is more prosperous, many people have started to be short ** bloggers, not only can they reap a good salary, but also can become a top popular star, borrowing the hall to make their debut, which makes many people choose some very bad atmosphere in order to get such results.

Platforms should increase the management of platforms and issue relevant regulations, which can effectively stop bad practices. It can also be effective in stopping this kind of thing from happening.

To correct this bad trend, the bureau will ban some bad anchors, and they will have no way to broadcast live to improve this atmosphere and make the live broadcast platform better at pretending to be ants.

I think it's important to strictly review the information and behavior of the streamer. Be sure to do a good job of supervision.

Platforms can put in place a series of rules and regulations to put an end to this kind of culture. Now the Internet atmosphere is really a bit chaotic.

Increase the punishment, and the online anchor dares to do this, because the cost of making a mistake is too low.

Poor supervision by regulatory authorities has serious consequences! If it is not rectified, it will be a crime against a harmonious society.

Internet celebrities who go to and from school across the country start from the doll, and if the Internet celebrity is strong, the country will be strong.

Some online livestreaming platforms have violations of laws and regulations such as pornography, violence, and gambling, seriously infringing on the lawful rights and interests of citizens and the public interest.

As a new type of entertainment, online live streaming has become an indispensable part of people's daily life. However, some online livestreaming platforms have violations of laws and regulations, such as pornography, violence, and gambling, which seriously harm the public interest and social order. **The department has taken heavy-handed rectification measures aimed at cracking down on these illegal acts, protecting the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, and at the same time guiding the standardized and healthy development of the online live broadcast industry, and promoting social harmony and stability.

Normative approach to webcasting:

1. Protect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens. Online livestreaming that violates laws and regulations such as pornography, violence, and gambling will cause serious harm to the lawful rights and interests of citizens, especially minors and vulnerable groups. **It is necessary to take measures to protect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens and safeguard the public interest.

2. Regulate the online live broadcast industry. The webcast industry is an emerging industry, and it needs to be regulated and guided, establish and improve laws, regulations and industry standards, and promote the healthy development and healthy competition of the industry.

3. Maintain social harmony and stability. Online livestreaming that violates laws and regulations, such as pornography, violence, and gambling, will have a negative impact on social stability, and even lead to social contradictions and conflicts. **It is necessary to take measures to maintain social harmony and stability and ensure social tranquility and development.

Hidden dangers of short ** apps. There is no restriction on the user's words and actions. Some users frantically reward anchors, and do not hesitate to use P2P platforms for loan consumption and overdraft consumption, resulting in huge debts that cannot be repaid.

Minors do not top up large amounts of money without parental permission.

They even use the family's savings to recharge without permission, which has a bad impact on the stability of the family. App user reviews are vulgar. User reviews contain a large number of vulgar and sensitive words and other issues, which are strictly supervised by the relevant authorities. The remarks and quality of the anchor.

The anchor's remarks were inappropriate. Some anchors published some sensitive words on the live broadcast platform, failing to establish the image of a good self-respecting friend. The threshold for anchors to enter the industry in online live streaming platforms is low.

This has led to the rapid expansion of the live broadcast anchor group. The quality of this huge group is uneven, and some anchors have committed violations in order to attract viewers. Innovation of the platform's profit model.

App users are not highly dependent on the platform. At present, the live broadcast app is mainly based on Internet celebrity resources, supplemented by ** events, star resources such as oranges, etc., but Internet celebrities will always be outdated.

Most of them still have to be returned to the anchors themselves, and once the anchors are mined, the revenue of the live broadcast platform will be lost.

I think that these people who like to disturb the environment of online live broadcast should be banned, many times everyone really wants to improve their lives through live broadcasting, and they also abide by the live broadcast environment, but there are so many people, they want to go the wrong way, so they bring this atmosphere to the bad.

What is the place of live streaming in our lives?

Who led the atmosphere of live broadcasting?

Why are there so many influencers**?

I think there should be some relevant systems and policies to regulate the online environment, and if there are violations of law and discipline during online live broadcasts, they should be severely punished.

First of all, the relevant departments should increase their supervision, and there should also be a regulation on the personnel of these live broadcasts, and at the same time, the network environment should also be purified.

On the one hand, they should formulate some relevant rules and regulations to carry out reasonable control, and on the other hand, they should eliminate the chaos in the Internet age.

First of all, these network organizations must increase the intensity of management and rectification, and once this kind of chaos occurs, the account must be banned, and the person must be deprived of the opportunity to come back again.

First of all, we should strengthen the management of this aspect, and secondly, there should be certain improvements on the platform, and some bad live broadcast platforms should not be allowed to affect the public's thinking and cause a series of unnecessary troubles.

I think there should be a law to prohibit the live streaming of certain vulgar content. This can effectively improve the network environment and prevent such behavior.