China is now forced to dig, does the state have any policies or laws to prohibit forced digging?

Japan has no army and cannot defeat the United States.

There is not much of a problem at home, and the ability to transport troops overseas and equipment is not good.

You can't beat the United States. As for Japan. The Navy and Air Force estimate that we can't do it, but the Army is different.

There are a lot of us. Tens of millions of reserves. No one can do anything about us.

The problem is that if people don't meet us, it's going to be troublesome, for example, if the United States or Japan blockade the island chain and take out our navy. Then use the F22 to get our air force and then people will retreat to the back of the island chain, we will have no way, the dumb is Coptis chinensis, after all, the navy is extinguished for others (provided that there is no nuclear war) Don't say what kind of ballistic missiles with conventional warheads are used, that thing can only scare people, and if it really starts, even if it is thrown into Tokyo to blow up a big crater, how much military effect can it have.

Reality speaks. It can't beat the United States. However, the United States does not dare to attack China, because the United States still does not know where China's secret bases are. This is the pride of China!

Wang Weiguo, a professor at the School of Economic Law at the China University of Political Science and Law, said that the constitution guarantees citizens' private legal property, including land use rights in addition to house ownership. The state should take this interest into account when carrying out land acquisition.

He pointed out a change, that is, in the era of planned economy, we can think that all construction projects are based on public purposes, taken from the public, used for the public, and all interests belong to the state. After the reform and opening up, many demolition projects, reasons, are not for public construction, a large number of project developers belong to the commercial body, but it has obtained the best planning and land use permission through various methods, and with the support of the first, began to demolish the residents' houses. This is essentially a private-to-private invasion.

There is no reason to expropriate another part of a private person's property for private gain. Therefore, there are two levels of problems, one is whether sufficient and fair compensation is given when expropriation is carried out for public purposes; The second is that if the ** is for the benefit of the businessman to carry out this kind of expropriation, the legality of this expropriation is a problem.

What are you digging for? The exploitation of mineral resources requires the permission of the state authorities, otherwise it cannot be exploited at will.

If you want to ask, "What is a man?" "Presumably you are giving an answer that goes beyond the definition of Marx or any philosopher.

Just because we are human beings, we can pass on civilization from generation to generation while creating civilization, and we are good at learning. I always think: in fact, each of us may be a poet, a poet, an artist, etc., at least a thinker, a philosopher.

Life is precious, worthy of reverence and cherishment!

Don't be so inferior, I believe that our China will slowly become stronger! Why do you have so little self-confidence in us in China? Aren't you Chinese? As Chinese, we must have confidence in China and believe that China will always be strong and unyielding.

It's strong, what about dreaming, right? At present, 500 million people in China are completely affected by the cold and have nowhere to live. Is this called powerful?

Some people say that Chinese society is progressing and improving, whether you believe it or not, I don't believe it anyway.

It's not strong at all, it's still falling.

On the whole, efforts are still being made to transform from non-mechanization to semi-mechanization and mechanization.

On the comprehensive strength is relatively strong, because China's development is relatively balanced, but in some high-tech ** and first-class countries are still some gaps, mainly compared with the United States and Russia, other countries in addition to a few old European brands, basically the United States and Russia ** extension, but the war not only depends on the first, but also experience, China is now relatively good, but the combat quality of the personnel has not been tested by the war is not good to draw conclusions, but the strong is not strong to go there, and the weak will not be very bad, As long as it goes through the baptism of one or two small wars now, it will be an elite division again, after all, China has a deep back road and a back road to rely on (nuclear weapons), and there is no deep back road to Japan, and it is only the United States that depends on it, so it must be him who fights with China and dies very badly, in general, China's strength is very strong, otherwise the foreign media will not often come out of nowhere.

It is weak for first-class countries such as the United States, because China is still a developing country and belongs to the second rate, but it is okay to belong to the second rate.

It's pretty much the same, but it's much better than before.

First of all, the excavator is the name of the machine, and the technology is the operation skills related to the excavator. Which one is strong is that the skills taught in the college or technical school that need to be expressed are rich enough.

Which excavator technology is strong in Shandong, China, looking for Lanxiang.

This is an advertisement made by Shandong Lanxiang Senior Technical School on TV, because it is catchy, so many people are impressed, and recently this sentence has become popular on the Internet because of the "Lanxiang 100 people fight across provinces" incident.

I don't know what the reason is, but I often hear comrades say that if you have time, you can go to Shandong Lanxiang to have a look.